Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Observations Regarding ‘Quality of Life’ and ‘Comfort with Food’ After Bariatric Surgery: Comparison Between Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding and Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are coexisting first-choice restrictive procedures for bariatric surgery candidates, it is possible, given their different modes of action, that these procedures have different effects on quality of life (QOL). We hypothesized that improvement of QOL and comfort with food could be better with LSG compared to LAGB.

Methods

This cohort study included 131 obese patients who had either LAGB (n = 102) or LSG (n = 29). Patients were assessed during preoperative and at 6- and 12-month postoperative visits. Five QOL dimensions were assessed using the ‘Quality of Life, Obesity and Dietetics’ rating scale: physical impact, psycho-social impact, impact on sex life, comfort with food and diet experience. We compared QOL evolution between LAGB and LSG using linear mixed models adjusted for gender and body mass index at each visit.

Results

Excess weight loss was 28.4 ± 14.7% and 34.8 ± 18.4% for LAGB and 35.7 ± 14.3% and 43.8 ± 17.8% for LSG at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Both LAGB and LSG provided significant improvement in the physical, psycho-social, sexual and diet experience dimensions of QOL. LSG was associated with better improvement than LAGB in short-term (6-month) comfort with food.

Conclusions

Our results add further evidence to the benefit of LSG and LAGB in obesity management. Within the first year of follow-up, there is no lasting difference in the comfort with food dimension between LSG and LABG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doll HA, Petersen SE, Stewart-Brown SL. Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire. Obes Res. 2000;8(2):160–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Nunen AM, Wouters EJ, Vingerhoets AJ, et al. The health-related quality of life of obese persons seeking or not seeking surgical or non-surgical treatment: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2007;17(10):1357–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. NEJM. 2004;351:2683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballantyne GH. Measuring outcomes following bariatric surgery: weight loss parameters, improvement in co-morbid conditions, change in quality of life and patient satisfaction. Obes Surg. 2003;13:954–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, et al. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes. 2007;31:1248–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herpertz S, Kielmann R, Wolf AM, et al. Do psychosocial variables predict weight loss or mental health after obesity surgery? A systematic review. Obes Res. 2004;12:1554–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Hout GC, Boekestein P, Fortuin FA, et al. Psychosocial functioning following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16:787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB. A rational approach to cholelithiasis in bariatric surgery: its application to the laparoscopically placed adjustable gastric band. Arch Surg. 2003;138:908–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinojosa MW, Varela JE, Parikh D, et al. National trends in use and outcome of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:150–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abu-Jaish W, Rosenthal RJ. Sleeve gastrectomy: a new surgical approach for morbid obesity. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;4:101–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O’Brien PE. Quality of life after lap-band placement: influence of time, weight loss, and comorbidities. Obes Res. 2001;9:713–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Livingston EH, Fink AS. Quality of life: cost and future of bariatric surgery. Arch Surg. 2003;138:383–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tolonen P, Victorzon M. Quality of life following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding—the Swedish band and the Moorehead–Ardelt questionnaire. Obes Surg. 2003;13:424–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horchner R, Tuinebreijer MW, Kelder PH. Quality-of-life assessment of morbidly obese patients who have undergone a Lap-Band operation: 2-year follow-up study. Is the MOS SF-36 a useful instrument to measure quality of life in morbidly obese patients? Obes Surg. 2001;11:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahroni JH, Montgomery KF, Watkins BM. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: weight loss, co-morbidities, medication usage and quality of life at one year. Obes Surg. 2005;15:641–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Brown W, et al. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2002;12:652–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabbagh C, Verhaeghe P, Dhahri A, et al. Two-year results on morbidity, weight loss and quality of life of sleeve gastrectomy as first procedure, sleeve gastrectomy after failure of gastric banding and gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20:679–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Todkar JS, Shah SS, Shah PS, et al. Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:142–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schweiger C, Weiss R, Keidar A. Effect of different bariatric operations on food tolerance and quality of eating. Obes Surg. 2010;20(10):1393–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gustavsson S, Westling A. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: complications and side effects responsible for the poor long-term outcome. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002;9:115–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Liu J. Plasma ghrelin modulation in gastric band operation and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2009;19:357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ziegler O, Filipecki J, Girod I, et al. Development and validation of a French obesity-specific quality of life questionnaire: quality of life, obesity and dietetics (QOLOD) rating scale. Diab Metab. 2005;31:273–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kolotkin RL, Head S, Hamilton M, et al. Assessing impact of weight on quality of life. Obes Res. 1995;3:49–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kolotkin RL, Head S, Brookhart A. Construct validity of the impact of weight on quality of life questionnaire. Obes Res. 1997;5:434–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. The R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org.

  27. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Amer J Med. 2009;122:248–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Omana JJ, Nguyen SQ, Herron D, et al. Comparison of comorbidity resolution and improvement between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2513–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee WJ, Wang W, Yu PJ, et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in Asia. Obes Surg. 2006;16:586–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ottawa Charter for health promotion. International Conference on health promotion: the move towards a new public health. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: World Health Organisation; 1986

  31. Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. A new questionnaire for quick assessment of food tolerance after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17:2–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8:487–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Duval K, Marceau P, Perusse L, et al. An overview of obesity-specific quality of life questionnaires. Obes Rev. 2006;7:347–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Harrel F. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer series in statistics. Springer. 2001

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Vaïda Miknius, Jean-Pierre Chevrollier and Martine Objois for their help in assessing the patients.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Jacobi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunault, P., Jacobi, D., Léger, J. et al. Observations Regarding ‘Quality of Life’ and ‘Comfort with Food’ After Bariatric Surgery: Comparison Between Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding and Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 21, 1225–1231 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0411-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0411-4

Keywords

Navigation