Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychological Characteristics of Morbidly Obese Candidates for Bariatric Surgery

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Morbid obesity has multiple negative consequences for psychological health. These patients are described as depressed, anxious, and impulsive, with low self-esteem and impaired quality of life. The severity of these psychological disorders has been related to the degree of obesity. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychopathological characteristics of obese candidates for bariatric surgery, determining differences and similarities in general and specific psychopathologic symptoms among patients with different degrees of obesity and normal-weight individuals.

Methods

The study included 50 patients (26 type III obesity, 24 type IV obesity) and 25 normal-weight volunteers. They were all assessed for: stress (CED44-B), anxiety–depression (General Health Questionnaire), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), family function (Apgar Family Function Questionnaire), quality of life (Spanish version of the Quality of Life Index), personality (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised), food craving (Food Craving Questionnaire-Trait), and eating behavior disorder (EBD) symptomatology (Eating Disorders Examination–Questionnaire Version-4).

Results

The obese patients had higher levels of stress, anxiety, depression, food craving, and EBD symptoms and lower levels of self-esteem and quality of life compared with normal-weight controls. No personality or family function disorders were observed in any of the obese or normal-weight subjects. Patients with type III and type IV obesity differed only in anxiety and personality findings.

Conclusions

Although the presence of psychological disorders cannot be taken as an absolute criterion for exclusion of candidates for obesity surgery, a better understanding of the relationship of these variables with weight loss and other outcomes of bariatric surgery may improve patient selection and facilitate more appropriate interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Residori L, García-Lorda P, Flancbaum L, et al. Prevalence of co-morbidities in obese patients before bariatric surgery: effect of race. Obes Surg. 2003;13:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sturm R, Wells KB. Does obesity contribute as much to morbidity as poverty or smoking? Public Health. 2001;115:229–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Hout GCM, Boekestein P, Fortuin FAM, et al. Psychosocial functioning following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16:787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kinzl JF, Schrattenecker M, Traweger C, et al. Psychosocial predictor of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1609–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schowalter M, Benecke A, Lager C, et al. Changes in depression following gastric banding: a 5- to 7-year prospective study. Obes Surg. 2008;15:1177–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mamplekou E, Komesidou V, Bissias Ch, et al. Psychological condition and quality of life in patients with morbid obesity before and after surgical weight loss. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1177–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nederkoorn C, Smulders FT, Havermans RC, et al. Impulsivity in obese women. Appetite. 2006;47:253–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fried M, Hainer V, Basdevant A, et al. Interdisciplinary European guidelines for surgery for severe (morbid) obesity. Obes Surg. 2007;17:260–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kral JG, Brolin RE, Buchwald H, et al. Research considerations in obesity surgery. Obes Res. 2002;10:63–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pories WJ, MacDonald KG, Morgan EJ, et al. Surgical treatment of obesity and its effect on diabetes: 10-y follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55(suppl):582S–5S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brolin RE, Kenler Ha, Gorman RC, et al. The dilemma of outcome assessment after operations for morbid obesity. Surgery. 1989;105:337–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Busetto L, Segato G, De Luca M, et al. Weight loss and postoperative complications in morbidly obese patients with binge eating disorder treated by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2005;15:195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Herpertz S, Kielmann R, Wolf AM, et al. Do psychosocial variables predict weight loss or mental health after obesity surgery?—a systematic review. Obes Res. 2004;10:1554–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Hout GCM, Verschure SK, van Heck GL. Psychological predictors of success following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15:552–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Levine MD, et al. Psychiatric disorder among bariatric surgery candidates: relationship to obesity and functional health status. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanz-Carrillo C, García-Campayo J, Rubio A, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:167–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Montón C, Pérez M, Campos R. Escalas de ansiedad y depresión de Goldberg: una guía de entrevista eficaz para la detección del malestar psíquico. Atención Primaria. 1993;12:345–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vázquez A, Jiménez G, Vázquez-Morejón R. Escala de autoestima de Rosenberg: fiabilidad y validez en población clínica española. Apuntes de Psicología. 2004;22:247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mezzich J, Ruiperez M, Pérez C, et al. The Spanish version of the quality of life index: presentation and validation. J of Nerv Ment Dis. 2000;188:301–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bellón J, Delgado A, Luna del Castillo J, et al. Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de función familiar Apgar-familiar. Atención Primaria. 1996;18:289–96.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eysenck H. How valid is the psychoticism scale? A comment on the Van Kampen critique. Eur J Pers. 1995;9:103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cepeda-Benito A, Fernández MC, Moreno S. Relationship of gender and eating disorder symptoms to reported cravings for food: construct validation of state and trait craving questionnaires in Spanish. Appetite. 2003;40:47–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katrine A, Grillo C. The Spanish language version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire: comparison with the Spanish language version of the eating disorder examination and test–retest reliability. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45:1369–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dallman MF, Pecoraro N, Akana SF, et al. Chronic stress and obesity: a new view of “comfort food”. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100:11696–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bulik nCM, Sullivan PF, Kendler KS, et al. Medical and psychiatric morbidity in obese women with and without binge eating. Int J Eat Disord. 2002;32:72–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Striegel-Moore R, Cachelin F, Dohm F, et al. Comparison of binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa in a community sample. Int J Eat Disord. 2001;29:157–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eldredge KL, Agras WS. Weight and shape overconcern and emotional eating in binge eating disorder. In J Eat Disord. 1996;19:73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. van Strien T, Ouwens MA. Counterregulation in female obese emotional eaters: Schachter, Goldman, & Gordon’s (1968) test of psychosomatic theory revisited. Eat Behav. 2003;3:329–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Walfish S, Vance D, Fabricatore AN. Psychological evaluation of bariatric surgery applicants: procedures and reasons for delay or denial of surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1578–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Afnieszka H, Kozlowska Dziurwicz MA, Wierzbicke Z, et al. The objective of psychological evaluation in the process of qualifying candidates for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16:196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Avda. Fuerzas Armadas No. 2, 18014, Granada, Spain

    V. Abilés, J. Abilés, C. Mellado & A. Pérez de la Cruz

  2. Department of Personality, Treatment, and Evaluation, School of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    S. Rodríguez-Ruiz & M. C. Fernández-Santaella

  3. Department of Surgery, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain

    A. García

Authors
  1. V. Abilés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Rodríguez-Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Abilés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Mellado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Pérez de la Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. C. Fernández-Santaella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Abilés.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abilés, V., Rodríguez-Ruiz, S., Abilés, J. et al. Psychological Characteristics of Morbidly Obese Candidates for Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 20, 161–167 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9726-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9726-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation