Skip to main content
Log in

Considerations for the use of the Beck Depression Inventory in the Assessment of Weight-Loss Surgery Seeking Patients

  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is an assessment frequently used in pre-surgical evaluation for patients seeking bariatric surgery. Items on the BDI reflect both cognitive and somatic symptoms associated with depression. However, many patients seeking bariatric surgery have medical symptomatology and health concerns independent of the syndrome of depression, and thus scores on the BDI may inflate their actual level of depression.With depression viewed by some clinicians as contraindicated for bariatric surgery, clarification of the BDI items is necessary.

Methods

Pre-surgical BDIs of 259 bariatric patients were reviewed. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure of the BDI in this population. Independent sample t-tests compared the means of the cognitive and somatic items.

Results

A clear two-factor solution emerged on the BDI, indicating items mapped on to either a cognitive or a somatic domain. The patients in the present sample also were more likely to endorse somatic and health-related symptoms on the BDI.

Conclusions

The factor structure of the BDI in this population is similar to that in other non weight-loss surgery populations. However, this population is more likely to endorse somatic complaints that may not be indicative of depression, rather an acknowledgement of actual medical complaints. Thus, assessors should be mindful of specific symptom endorsement, rather than a total depression score when utilizing the BDI to help determine surgery suitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brolin R. Bariatric surgery and long-term control of morbid obesity. JAMA 2002; 288: 2793–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen N, Root J, Zainabadi K et al. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 1198–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wadden T, Sarwer D, Williams N. Behavioral assessment and characteristics of patients seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity 2006; 14: 51S–52S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Draft Statement. Obes Surg 1991; 1: 257–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauchowitz A, Gonder-Frederick L, Olbrisch M et al. Psychosocial evaluation of bariatric surgery candidates: A survey of present practices. Psychosom Med 2005; 67: 825–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wadden T, Butryn M, Sarwer D et al. Comparison of psychosocial status in treatment-seeking women with Class III vs. Class I-II obesity. Obesity 2006; 14: 90S–98S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wadden T, Sarwer D. Behavioral assessment of candidates for bariatric surgery: A patient-oriented approach. Obesity 2006; 14: 53S–62S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu L, Benotti P, Dwyer J et al. Nonsurgical factors that influence the outcome of bariatric surgery: A review. Psychosom Med 1998; 60: 338–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck A, Ward C, Mendelson M et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psych 1961; 4: 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cavanugh S, Clark D, Gibbons R. Diagnosing depressionin the hospitalized medical ill. Psychosom 1983; 24: 809–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plumb M, Holland J. Comparative studies of psychological function in patients with advanced cancer I: self-reported depressive symptoms. Psychosom 1977; 39: 264–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Emmons C, Fetting J, Zonderman A. A comparison of the symptoms of medical and psychiatric patients on the Beck Depression Inventory. Gen Hosp Psych 1987; 9: 398–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beck A, Steer R, Garbin M. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988; 8: 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beck A, Steer R, Brown G. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation: 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psycometrika 1974; 35: 31–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Costello A, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Practical assessment, research and evaluation. 2005; 10: 1–9.

  17. Arnau R, Meagher M, Norris P. Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory II with primary care medical patients. Health Psych 2001; 20: 112–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross C. Overweight and depression. J Health Soc Behav 1994; 35: 63–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Munoz PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munoz, D.J., Chen, E., Fischer, S. et al. Considerations for the use of the Beck Depression Inventory in the Assessment of Weight-Loss Surgery Seeking Patients. OBES SURG 17, 1097–1101 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9185-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9185-0

Key words

Navigation