Abstract
We investigated the mechanisms by which Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) improves social communication in a case series of 10 preschool-aged children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) identified brain responses during a biological motion perception task conducted prior to and following 16 weeks of PRT treatment. Overall, the neural systems supporting social perception in these 10 children were malleable through implementation of PRT; following treatment, neural responses were more similar to those of typically developing children (TD). However, at baseline, half of the children exhibited hypoactivation, relative to a group of TD children, in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), and half exhibited hyperactivation in this region. Strikingly, the groups exhibited differential neural responses to treatment: The five children who exhibited hypoactivation at baseline evidenced increased activation in components of the reward system including the ventral striatum and putamen. The five children who exhibited hyperactivation at baseline evidenced decreased activation in subcortical regions critical for regulating the flow of stimulation and conveying signals of salience to the cortex—the thalamus, amygdala, and hippocampus. Our results support further investigation into the differential effects of particular treatment strategies relative to specific neural targets. Identification of treatment strategies that address the patterns of neural vulnerability unique to each patient is consistent with the priority of creating individually tailored interventions customized to the behavioral and neural characteristics of a given person.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achenbach, T., & Rescorla, L. (2001). The manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM 5. American Psychiatric Association.
Bolling, D. Z., Pitskel, N. B., Deen, B., Crowley, M. J., Mayes, L. C., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2011). Development of neural systems for processing social exclusion from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Science, 14, 1431–1444.
Constantino, J. N. (2012). Social responsiveness scale (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Dawson, G., Webb, S. J., & McPartland, J. (2005). Understanding the nature of face processing impairment in autism: insights from behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 403–424.
Dawson, G., Jones, E. J., Merkle, K., Venema, K., Lowy, R., Faja, S., & Webb, S. J. (2012). Early behavioral intervention is associated with normalized brain activity in young children with autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51, 1150–1159.
Desikan, R. S., Segonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., & Killiany, R. J. (2006). An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage, 31(3), 968–80.
Doggett, R. A., Krasno, A. M., Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L. (2013). Acquisition of multiple questions in the context of social conversation in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–11.
Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 41–64.
Dunlap, G., & Egel, A. L. (1982). Motivational techniques. Educating and Understanding Autistic Children, 106–126.
Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. L. (1980). Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 619–627.
Elliott, C. D. (2006). Differential Ability Scales—second edition (DAS-II). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
Fischl, et al. (2002). Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron, 33, 341–355.
Gadow, K. D., & Sprafkin, J. N. (2002). Child symptom inventory 4: screening and norms manual. Checkmate plus.
Iacoboni, M., & Dapretto, M. (2006). The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 942–951.
Insel, T. R. (2014). Mental disorders in childhood: shifting the focus from behavioral symptoms to neurodevelopmental trajectories. JAMA, 311(17), 1727–1728.
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E., Woolrich, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2012). FSL. NeuroImage, 62, 782–790.
Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 201–211.
Jou, R. J., Jackowski, A. P., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., Staib, L. H., & Volkmar, F. R. (2011a). Diffusion tensor imaging in autism spectrum disorders: preliminary evidence of abnormal neural connectivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 153–162.
Jou, R. J., Mateljevic, N., Kaiser, M. D., Sugrue, D. R., Volkmar, F. R., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2011b). Structural neural phenotype of autism: preliminary evidence from a diffusion tensor imaging study using tract-based spatial statistics. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 1607–1613.
Kaiser, M. D., Hudac, C. M., Shultz, S., Lee, S. M., Cheung, C., Berken, A. M., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2010). Neural signatures of autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 21223–21228.
Klin, A., et al. (2009). Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature, 459(7244), 257–61.
Koegel, R. L., & Egel, A. L. (1979). Motivating autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 418–426.
Koegel, R. L., & Frea, W. D. (1993). Treatment of social behavior in autism through the modification of pivotal social skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 369–377.
Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2012). The PRT pocket guide: pivotal response treatment for autism spectrum disorders. Brookes Publishing Company. PO Box 10624, Baltimore, MD 21285.
Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Brookman, L. I. (2003). Empirically supported pivotal response interventions for children with autism. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Yale University School of Medicine, & Child Study Center (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 341–357). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Koegel, R. L., Camarata, S., Koegel, L. K., Ben-Tall, A., & Smith, A. E. (1998). Increasing speech intelligibility in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 241–251.
Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187–200.
Koegel, R. L., Schreibman, L., Good, A., Cerniglia, L., Murphy, C., Koegel, L. K. (1989). How to teach pivotal behaviors to children with autism: a training manual. University of California, Graduate School of Education.
Kohls, G., Chevallier, C., Troiani, V., & Schultz, R. T. (2012). Social ‘wanting’ dysfunction in autism: neurobiological underpinnings and treatment implications. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4, 1–20.
LeBlanc, L. A., Geiger, K. B., Sautter, R. A., & Sidener, T. M. (2007). Using the Natural Language Paradigm (NLP) to increase vocalizations of older adults with cognitive impairments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 437–444.
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism diagnostic observation schedule-WPS edition. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Macmillan, D. L. (1971). The problem of motivation in the education of the mentally retarded. Exceptional Children, 37, 579–586.
Markram, K., & Markram, H. (2010a). The intense world theory: a unifying theory of the neurobiology of autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 224.
Markram, K., & Markram, H. (2010b). The intense world theory: a unifying theory of the neurobiology of autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 224.
Markram, H., Rinaldi, T., & Markram, K. (2007). The intense world syndrome–an alternative hypothesis for autism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 1, 77.
Pitskel, N. B., Bolling, D. Z., Hudac, C. M., Lantz, S. D., Minchew, N. J., Vander Wyk, B. C., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2011). Brain mechanisms for processing direct and averted gaze in individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1686–1693.
Princiotta, D., & Goldstein, S. (2013). Early start Denver model. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Interventions for autism spectrum disorders (pp. 59–73). New York: Springer.
Rutter, M., Le Couteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003). Autism diagnostic interview-revised. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Douaud, G., Beckmann, C. F., Glasser, M. F., Griffanti, L., & Smith, S. M. (2014). Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. NeuroImage, 90, 449–468.
Scott-Van Zeeland, A. A., Dapretto, M., Ghahremani, D. G., Poldrack, R. A., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2010). Reward processing in autism. Autism Research, 3, 53–67.
Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals 4th Edition (CELF-4). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Stahmer, A. C. (1995). Teaching symbolic play skills to children with autism using pivotal response training. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 123–141.
Steiner, A. M., Gengoux, G. W., Klin, A., & Chawarska, K. (2013). Pivotal response treatment for infants at-risk for autism spectrum disorders: a pilot study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 91–102.
Ventola, P., Friedman, H. E., Anderson, L. C., Wolf, J. M., Oosting, D., Foss-Feig, J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2014). Improvements in social and adaptive functioning following short-duration PRT program: a Clinical Replication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–9.
Voos, A. C., Pelphrey, K. A., Tirrell, J., Bolling, D. Z., Vander Wyk, B., Kaiser, M. D., & Ventola, P. (2013). Neural mechanisms of improvements in social motivation after pivotal response treatment: two case studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1–10.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Deitz Family for funding this research, and acknowledge additional support from Esme Usdan and family, the Hilibrand Autism Fellowship, the Harris Professorship at the Yale Child Study Center given to Kevin Archer Pelphrey, Allied World, and the Autism Science Foundation. This work is also supported in part by the Yale University Biomedical High Performance Computing Center (NIH grants RR19895 and RR029676-01). We wish to thank the families of the children included in this study for their time and participation. We also wish to thank our colleagues Cara Keifer, Avery Voos, Jonathan Tirrell, Laura Anderson, and Cara Cordeaux for their contributions to the treatment work and clinical characterization of the sample.
Conflict of interest
Pamela Ventola, Daniel Yang, Hannah Friedman, Devon Oosting, Julie Wolf, Denis Sukhodolsky, and Kevin A. Pelphrey declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, and the applicable revisions at the time of investigation. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all patients and verbal assent was obtained from all of the children.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ventola, P., Yang, D.Y.J., Friedman, H.E. et al. Heterogeneity of neural mechanisms of response to pivotal response treatment. Brain Imaging and Behavior 9, 74–88 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-014-9331-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-014-9331-y