Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distance is Relative: Unpacking a Principal Barrier in Rural Healthcare

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Distance to healthcare services is a known barrier to access. However, the degree to which distance is a barrier is not well described. Distance may impact different patients in different ways and be mediated by the context of medical need.

Objective

Identify factors related to distance that impede access to care for rural veterans.

Approach

Mixed-methods approach including surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus groups at 15 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care clinics in 8 Midwestern states. Survey data were compiled and interviews transcribed and coded for thematic content.

Participants

Surveys were completed by 96 patients and 88 providers/staff. In-depth interviews were completed by 42 patients and 64 providers/staff. A total of 7 focus groups were convened consisting of providers and staff.

Key results

Distance was identified by patients, providers, and staff as the most important barrier for rural veterans seeking healthcare. In-depth interviews revealed specific examples of barriers to care such as long travel for common diagnostic services, routine specialty care, and emergency services. Patient factors compounding the impact of these barriers were health status, functional impairment, travel cost, and work or family obligations. Providers and staff reported challenges to healthcare delivery due to distance.

Conclusions

Distance as a barrier to healthcare was not uniformly defined. Rather, its importance was relative to the health status and resources of patients, complexity of service provided, and urgency of service needed. Improved transportation, flexible fee-based services, more structured communication mechanisms, and integration with community resources will improve access to care and overall health status for rural veterans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kane T. Who Are the Recruits? The Demographic Characteristics of US Military Enlistment, 2003–2005. The Heritage Foundation; 2006 Oct 27.

  2. Richardson C, Waldrop J. Veterans: 2000. Census 2000 Brief. US Census Bureau; 2003.

  3. O’Hare W, Bishop B. US Rural Soldiers Account for a Disproportionately High Share of Casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Carsey Institute Reports on Rural America. Fact Sheet No. 3. 2006.

  4. Booz Allen Hamilton. Veterans Rural Health: Perspectives and Opportunities. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health, VHA. 2008.

  5. Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109–461, Sec. 212 (2006).

  6. Weeks WB, Kazis LE, Shen Y, et al. Differences in health-related quality of life in rural and urban veterans. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1762–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace AE, Lee R, Mackenzie TA, et al. A longitudinal analysis of rural and urban veterans' health-related quality of life. J Rural Health. 2010;26(2):156–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goins RT, Williams KA, Carter MW, Spencer SM, Solovieva T. Perceived barriers to health care access among rural older adults: a qualitative study. J Rural Health. 2005;21(3):206–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy JF, Piette JD, Fortney JC, Valenstein M, Blow FC. Outpatient visit chaining among patients with serious mental illness. Med Care. 2006;44(3):257–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fortney JC, Booth BM, Blow FC, Bunn JY. The effects of travel barriers and age on the utilization of alcoholism treatment aftercare. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1995;21(3):391–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mooney C, Zwanziger J, Phibbs CS, Schmitt S. Is travel distance a barrier to veterans' use of VA hospitals for medical surgical care? Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(12):1743–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fortney JC, Maciejewski ML, Warren JJ, Burgess JF Jr. Does improving geographic access to VA primary care services impact patients' patterns of utilization and costs? Inquiry. 2005;42(1):29–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Borowsky SJ, Nelson DB, Fortney JC, Hedeen AN, Bradley JL, Chapko MK. VA community-based outpatient clinics: performance measures based on patient perceptions of care. Med Care. 2002;40(7):578–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Policy and Planning PO. VAST Service Sites 2nd Quarter FY10 - March 31, 2010. VHA SITE TRACKING (VAST) SYSTEM; 2010.

  15. Wray NP, Weiss TW, Christian CE. The health status of veterans using mobile clinics in rural areas. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1999;10(3):338–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. SAS [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2004.

  17. NVivo 8 [computer program]. Doncaster, Australia: QSR International; 2008.

  18. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Policy and Planning, National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. “Analysis of Unique Veterans Utilization of VA Benefits and Services,” 2009 April 29. http://www1.va.gov/VETDATA/docs/SpecialReports/uniqueveteransMay.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2011.

  19. Veterans’ Mental Health and Other Care Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110–387, Sec. 402 (2008).

  20. Wakefield BJ, Tripp-Reimer T, Rosenbaum ME, Rosenthal GE. Veterans' use of Department of Veterans Affairs care and perceptions of outsourcing inpatient care. Mil Med. 2007;172(6):565–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaboli PJ, Shivapour DM, Henderson MS, Barnett MJ, Ishani A, Carter BL. Patient and provider perceptions of hypertension treatment: do they agree? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007;9(6):416–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buzza CD, Williams MB. Vander Weg MW, Christensen AJ, Kaboli PJ, Reisinger HS. Part II, provider perspectives: should patients be activated to request evidence-based medicine? A qualitative study of the VA project to implement diuretics (VAPID). Implement Sci. 2010;5:24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pilling SA, Williams MB, Brackett RH, et al. Part I, patient perspective: activating patients to engage their providers in the use of evidence-based medicine: a qualitative evaluation of the VA Project to Implement Diuretics (VAPID). Implement Sci. 2010;5:23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Central Region (VRHRC-CR), and the VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service, Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) (HFP 04–149). Dr. Reisinger is supported by Research Career Development Award from the Health Services Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs (CD1 08-013-1).

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. This research was presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Applied Anthropology, March 2010, Merida, Mexico. The authors have no conflict of interests to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Schacht Reisinger PhD.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 176 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buzza, C., Ono, S.S., Turvey, C. et al. Distance is Relative: Unpacking a Principal Barrier in Rural Healthcare. J GEN INTERN MED 26 (Suppl 2), 648 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1762-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1762-1

Key words

Navigation