Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Equivalence and Noninferiority Testing

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasingly, the goal of many studies is to determine if new therapies have equivalent or noninferior efficacies to the ones currently in use. These studies are called equivalence/noninferiority studies, and the statistical methods for their analysis require only simple modifications to the traditional hypotheses testing framework. Nevertheless, important and subtle issues arise with the application of such methods. This article describes the concepts and statistical methods involved in testing equivalence/noninferiority. The aim is to enable the clinician to understand and critically assess the growing number of articles utilizing such methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Staszewski S, Keisser P, Montaner J, et al. Abacavir-Lamivudine-Zidobudine vs Indinavir-Lamivudine-Zidobudine in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected adults. JAMA. 2001;285:1155–1163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokin Biopharm. 1987;15:657–680.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes Investigators (OASIS-5). Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1464–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wellek S. Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garret AD. Therapeutic equivalence: fallacies and falsification. Statist Med. 2003;22:741–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaul S, Diamond GA. Good enough: a primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:62–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barker LE, Luman ET, McCauley MM, Chu SY. assessing equivalence: an alternative to the use of difference tests for measuring disparities in vaccination coverage. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:1056–1061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hintze J. PASS 2008. NCSS. LLC. Kaysville, Utah (www.ncss.com).

  9. Wiens BL, Zhao W. The role of intention to treat in analysis of noninferiority studies. Clinical Trials. 2007;4:286–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebbutt AF, Frith L. Practical issues in equivalence trials. Statist Med. 1998;17:1691–1701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm073113.pdf. (Accessed 8/24/2010).

  12. Ellenberg SS, Temple R. Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments: part 2: practical issues and specific cases. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:464–470.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Temple R, Ellenberg SS. Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments: part 1: ethical and scientific issues. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:455–453.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Henanff A, Girardeau B, Baron G, et al. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA. 2006;295:1147–1151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gotzsche PC. Lessons from and cautions about noninferiority and equivalence random trials. JAMA. 2006;295:1172–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. An extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006;295:1152–1160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esteban Walker PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, E., Nowacki, A.S. Understanding Equivalence and Noninferiority Testing. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 192–196 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1513-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1513-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation