Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a Longitudinal Medical School Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum: A Pilot Study

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is increasingly taught in medical schools, but few curricula have been evaluated using validated instruments.

Objective

To evaluate a longitudinal medical school EBM curriculum using a validated instrument.

Design, Participants, Measurements

We evaluated EBM attitudes and knowledge of 32 medical students as they progressed through an EBM curriculum. The first part was an EBM “short course” with didactic and small-group sessions occurring at the end of the second year. The second part integrated EBM assignments with third-year clinical rotations. The validated 15-item Berlin Questionnaire was administered before the course, after the short course, and at the end of the third year.

Results

EBM knowledge scores increased from baseline by 2.8 points at the end of the second year portion of the course (p = .0001), and by 3.7 points at the end of the third year (p < .0001). Self-rated EBM knowledge increased from baseline by 0.8 and 1.1 points, respectively (p = .0006 and p < .0001, respectively). EBM was felt to be of high importance for medical education and clinical practice at all time points, peaking after the short course.

Conclusions

A longitudinal medical school EBM curriculum was associated with increased EBM knowledge. This knowledge increase was sustained throughout the curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Norman GR , Shannon SI. Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal. Can Med Assoc J. 1998;158:177–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Green ML. Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: a critical review of curricula. Acad Med. 1999;74:686–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor R , Reeves B , Ewings P , Binns S , Keast J , Mears R. A systematic review of the effectiveness of critical appraisal skills training for clinicians. Med Educ. 2000;34:120–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akl EA , Izuchukwu IS , El-Dika S , Fritsche L , Kunz R , Schunemann HJ. Integrating an evidence-based medicine rotation into an internal medicine residency program. Acad Med. 2004;79:897–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnett SH , Kaiser S , Morgan LK , et al.. An integrated program for evidence-based medicine in medical school. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000;67:163–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Del Mar C , Glasziou P , Meyer D. Teaching evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2004;329:989–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith CA , Ganschow PS , Reilly BM , et al.. Teaching residents evidence-based medicine skills: a controlled trial of effectiveness and assessment of durability. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:710–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fritsche L , Greenhalgh T , Falck-Ytter Y , Neumayer H-H , Kunz R. Do short courses in evidence based medicine improve knowledge and skills? Validation of Berlin questionnaire and before and after study of courses in evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2002;325:1338–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyatt G , Rennie D. Users’ guides to the medical literature. Chicago: AMA Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hatala R , Guyatt G. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2002;288:1110–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bradt P , Moyer V. How to teach evidence-based medicine. Clin Perinatol. 2003;30:419–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coomarasamy A , Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329:1017–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan KS , Awonuga AO , Dwarakanath LS , Taylor R. Assessments in evidence-based medicine workshops: loose connection between perception of knowledge and its objective assessment. Med Teach. 2001;23:92–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaneyfelt T , Baum KD , Bell D , Feldstein D , Houston TK , Kaatz S , Whelan C , Green M. Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1116–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramos KD , Schafer S , Tracz SM. Validation of the Fresno Test of competence in evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2003;326:319–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin P. West MD, PhD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11606_2008_625_MOESM1_ESM.doc

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

West, C.P., McDonald, F.S. Evaluation of a Longitudinal Medical School Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum: A Pilot Study. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1057–1059 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0625-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0625-x

KEY WORDS

Navigation