Abstract
Background
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is increasingly taught in medical schools, but few curricula have been evaluated using validated instruments.
Objective
To evaluate a longitudinal medical school EBM curriculum using a validated instrument.
Design, Participants, Measurements
We evaluated EBM attitudes and knowledge of 32 medical students as they progressed through an EBM curriculum. The first part was an EBM “short course” with didactic and small-group sessions occurring at the end of the second year. The second part integrated EBM assignments with third-year clinical rotations. The validated 15-item Berlin Questionnaire was administered before the course, after the short course, and at the end of the third year.
Results
EBM knowledge scores increased from baseline by 2.8 points at the end of the second year portion of the course (p = .0001), and by 3.7 points at the end of the third year (p < .0001). Self-rated EBM knowledge increased from baseline by 0.8 and 1.1 points, respectively (p = .0006 and p < .0001, respectively). EBM was felt to be of high importance for medical education and clinical practice at all time points, peaking after the short course.
Conclusions
A longitudinal medical school EBM curriculum was associated with increased EBM knowledge. This knowledge increase was sustained throughout the curriculum.
References
Norman GR , Shannon SI. Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal. Can Med Assoc J. 1998;158:177–81.
Green ML. Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: a critical review of curricula. Acad Med. 1999;74:686–94.
Taylor R , Reeves B , Ewings P , Binns S , Keast J , Mears R. A systematic review of the effectiveness of critical appraisal skills training for clinicians. Med Educ. 2000;34:120–5.
Akl EA , Izuchukwu IS , El-Dika S , Fritsche L , Kunz R , Schunemann HJ. Integrating an evidence-based medicine rotation into an internal medicine residency program. Acad Med. 2004;79:897–904.
Barnett SH , Kaiser S , Morgan LK , et al.. An integrated program for evidence-based medicine in medical school. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000;67:163–8.
Del Mar C , Glasziou P , Meyer D. Teaching evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2004;329:989–90.
Smith CA , Ganschow PS , Reilly BM , et al.. Teaching residents evidence-based medicine skills: a controlled trial of effectiveness and assessment of durability. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:710–5.
Fritsche L , Greenhalgh T , Falck-Ytter Y , Neumayer H-H , Kunz R. Do short courses in evidence based medicine improve knowledge and skills? Validation of Berlin questionnaire and before and after study of courses in evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2002;325:1338–41.
Guyatt G , Rennie D. Users’ guides to the medical literature. Chicago: AMA Press; 2002.
Hatala R , Guyatt G. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2002;288:1110–2.
Bradt P , Moyer V. How to teach evidence-based medicine. Clin Perinatol. 2003;30:419–33.
Coomarasamy A , Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329:1017–21.
Khan KS , Awonuga AO , Dwarakanath LS , Taylor R. Assessments in evidence-based medicine workshops: loose connection between perception of knowledge and its objective assessment. Med Teach. 2001;23:92–4.
Shaneyfelt T , Baum KD , Bell D , Feldstein D , Houston TK , Kaatz S , Whelan C , Green M. Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1116–27.
Ramos KD , Schafer S , Tracz SM. Validation of the Fresno Test of competence in evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2003;326:319–21.
Conflict of Interest
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
West, C.P., McDonald, F.S. Evaluation of a Longitudinal Medical School Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum: A Pilot Study. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1057–1059 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0625-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0625-x