Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Neighborhood-Level Factors Associated with Physical Dating Violence Perpetration: Results of a Representative Survey Conducted in Boston, MA

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neighborhood-level characteristics have been found to be associated with different forms of interpersonal violence, but studies of the relationship between these characteristics and adolescent dating violence are limited. We examined 6 neighborhood-level factors in relation to adolescent physical dating violence perpetration using both adolescent and adult assessments of neighborhood characteristics, each of which was aggregated across respondents to the neighborhood level. Data came from an in-school survey of 1,530 public high school students and a random-digit-dial telephone survey of 1,710 adult residents of 38 neighborhoods in Boston. Approximately 14.3% of the youth sample reported one or more acts of physical aggression toward a dating partner in the month preceding the survey. We calculated the odds of past-month physical dating violence by each neighborhood-level factor, adjusting for school clustering, gender, race, and nativity. In our first 6 models, we used the adolescent assessment of neighborhood factors and then repeated our procedures using the adult assessment data. Using the adolescent assessment data, lower collective efficacy (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.09–3.52), lower social control (AOR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.07–3.43), and neighborhood disorder (AOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05–1.35) were each associated with increased likelihood of physical dating violence perpetration. However, when we used the adult version of the neighborhood assessment data, no neighborhood factor predicted dating violence. The implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychol Bull. 2000; 126(2): 309–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim J, Liu JH, Colabianchi N, Pate RR. The effect of perceived and structural neighborhood conditions on adolescents’ physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010; 164(10): 935–942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Browning CR, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood context and racial differences in early adolescent sexual activity. Demography. 2004; 41(4): 697–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Browning CR, Burrington LA, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood structural inequality, collective efficacy, and sexual risk behavior among urban youth. J Health Soc Behav. 2008; 49(3): 269–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawachi I, Berkman L. Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Benson ML, Fox GL, DeMaris A, Van Wyk J. Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. J Quant Criminol. 2003; 19(3): 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunradi CB, Caetano R, Clark C, Schafer J. Neighborhood poverty as a predictor of intimate partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States: A multilevel analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2000; 10(5): 297–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miles-Doan R. Violence between spouses and intimates: Does neighborhood context matter? Soc Forces. 1998; 77(2): 623–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McNulty TL, Bellair PE. Explaining racial and ethnic differences in adolescent violence: Structural disadvantage, family well-being, and social capital. Justice Q. 2003; 20(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearlman DN, Zierler S, Gjelsvik A, Verhoek-Oftedahl W. Neighborhood environment, racial position, and risk of police-reported domestic violence: A contextual analysis. Public Health Rep. 2003; 118(1): 44–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McKinney CM, Caetano R, Harris TR, Ebama MS. Alcohol availability and intimate partner violence among US couples. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009; 33(1): 169–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cunradi CB. Neighborhoods, alcohol outlets and intimate partner violence: Addressing research gaps in explanatory mechanisms. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7(3): 799–813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Browning CR, Byron RA, Calder CA, et al. Commercial density, residential concentration, and crime: Land use patterns and violence in neighborhood context. J Res Crime Delinq. 2010; 47(3): 329–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Q, Kirby RS, Sigler RT, Hwang SS, LaGory ME, Goldenberg RL. A multilevel analysis of individual, household, and neighborhood correlates of intimate partner violence among low-income pregnant women in Jefferson County, Alabama. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(3): 531–539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Browning CR. The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. J Marriage Fam. 2002; 64(4): 833–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maimon D, Browning CR. Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violence behavior among urban youth. Criminology. 2010; 48(2): 443–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. YRBSS: youth online, comprehensive results. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/yrbss/index.asp. Accessed July 7, 2009.

  18. Brown A, Cosgrave E, Killackey E, Purcell R, Buckby J, Yung AR. The longitudinal association of adolescent dating violence with psychiatric disorders and functioning. J Interpers Violence. 2009; 24(12): 1964–1979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Whitaker DJ, Haileyesus T, Swahn M, Saltzman LS. Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(5): 941–947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Teten AL, Ball B, Valle LA, Noonan R, Rosenbluth B. Considerations for the definition, measurement, consequences, and prevention of dating violence victimization among adolescent girls. J Womens Health. 2009; 18(7): 923–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis SF, Fremouw W. Dating violence: A critical review of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001; 21(1): 105–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Intimate partner violence: definitions. September 20, 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/intimatepartnerviolence/definitions.html. Accessed November 7, 2010.

  23. Renner LM, Whitney SD. Examining symmetry in intimate partner violence among young adults using socio-demographic characteristics. J Fam Violence. 2010; 25(2): 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arriaga XB, Foshee VA. Adolescent dating violence—adolescents follow in their friends’, or their parents’, footsteps? J Interpers Violence. 2004; 19(2): 162–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jouriles EN, McDonald R, Garrido E, Rosenfield D, Brown AS. Assessing aggression in adolescent romantic relationships: Can we do it better? Psychol Assess. 2005; 17(4): 469–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller E, Decker MR, Raj A, Reed E, Marable D, Silverman JG. Intimate partner violence and health care-seeking patterns among female users of urban adolescent clinics. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 14(6): 910–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jain S, Buka SL, Subramanian SV, Molnar BE. Neighborhood predictors of dating violence victimization and perpetration in young adulthood: A multilevel study. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(9): 1737–1744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Raiford JL, Wingood GM, Diclemente RJ. Prevalence, incidence, and predictors of dating violence: A longitudinal study of African American female adolescents. J Womens Health. 2007; 16(6): 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kingston B, Huizinga D, Elliott DS. A test of social disorganization theory in high-risk urban neighborhoods. Youth Soc. 2009; 41(1): 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roux AVD. Neighborhoods and health: Where are we and were do we go from here? Rev D Epidemiol Et De Sante Publique. 2007; 55(1): 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Champion H, Foley KL, Sigmon-Smith K, Sutfin EL, DuRant RH. Contextual factors and health risk behaviors associated with date fighting among high school students. Women Health. 2008; 47(3): 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Banyard VL, Modecki KL. Interpersonal violence in adolescence—ecological correlates of self-reported perpetration. J Interpers Violence. 2006; 21(10): 1314–1332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Spriggs AL, Halpern CT, Herring AH, Schoenbach VJ. Family and school socioeconomic disadvantage: Interactive influences on adolescent dating violence victimization. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(11): 1956–1965.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Malik S, Sorenson SB, Aneshensel CS. Community and dating violence among adolescents: Perpetration and victimization. J Adolesc Health. 1997; 21(5): 291–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Azrael D, Johnson RM, Molnar BE, et al. Creating a youth violence data system for Boston, Massachusetts. Aust N Z J Criminol. 2009; 42(3): 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rothman EF, Johnson RM, Azrael D, Hall DM, Weinberg J. Perpetration of physical assault against dating partners, peers, and siblings among a locally representative sample of high school students in Boston, MA. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010; 164(12): 1118–1124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Osypuk T, Galea S. What level macro? Choosing appropriate levels to assess how place influences population health. In: Galea S, ed. Macrosocial determinants of population health. New York: Springer Media; 2007: 393–429.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Krieger N. A century of census tracts: health & the body politic (1906–2006). J Urban Health. 2006; 83(3): 355–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Campo P. Advancing theory and methods for multilevel models of residential neighborhoods and health. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157(1): 9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997; 277(5328): 918–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Earls FJ, Brooks-Gunn JB, Raudenbush SW, Sampson RJ. Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods: Community Survey, 1994-1995 – Data Collection Instrument. ICPSR 2766. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2007-10-29. 1994. doi:10.3886/ICPSR02766.

  42. Anonymous. P4: Neighborhood/block conditions. In: Dahlberg LL, Toal SB, Swahn M, Behrens CB, editors. Measuring violence-related attitudes, behaviors, and influences among youths: A compendium of assessment tools, 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2005. p. 349.

  43. SAS 9.1.3 Help and Documentation [computer program]. Version. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2000–2004.

  44. Raudenbush S, Bryk AS. A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociol Educ. 1986; 59(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Miller J, White NA. Gender and adolescent relationship violence: a contextual examination. Criminology. 2003; 41(4): 1207–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Linder F, Rice J, Wilcher R. Typologies of adolescent dating violence—identifying typologies of adolescent dating violence perpetration. J Interpers Violence. 2007; 22(5): 498–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW. Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology. 2001; 39(3): 517–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Caetano R, Ramisetty-Mikler S, Harris TR. Neighborhood characteristics as predictors of male to female and female to male partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2010; 25(11): 1986–2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Frye V. The informal social control of intimate partner violence against women: Exploring personal attitudes and perceived neighborhood social cohesion. J Community Psychol. 2007; 35(8): 1001–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Frye V, Galea S, Tracy M, Bucciarelli A, Putnam S, Wilt S. The role of neighborhood environment and risk of intimate partner femicide in a large urban area. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(8): 1473–1479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L. The spreading of disorder. Science. 2008; 322(5908): 1681–1685.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Peterson RD, Krivo LJ, Harris MA. Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter? J Res Crime Delinq. 2000; 37(1): 31–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Magdol L, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Silva PA. Developmental antecedents of partner abuse: A prospective-longitudinal study. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998; 107(3): 375–389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Casey EA, Beadnell B. The structure of male adolescent peer networks and risk for intimate partner violence perpetration: Findings from a national sample. J Youth Adolesc. 2010; 39(6): 620–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Emery C, Jolley J, Wu S. Initimate partner violence relationship dissolution among couples with children: The counterintuitive role of ‘law and order’ neighborhoods. J Community Psychol. 2010; 38(4): 456–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Johnson MP. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: 2 forms of violence against women. J Marriage Fam. 1995; 57(2): 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Avery-Leaf S, Cascardi M, Oleary KD, Cano A. Efficacy of a dating violence prevention program on attitudes justifying aggression. J Adolesc Health. 1997; 21(1): 11–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bookwala J, Frieze IH, Smith C, Ryan K. Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence Vict. 1992; 7: 297–311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cercone JJ, Beach SRH, Arias I. Gender symmetry in dating intimate partner violence: Does behavior imply similar constructs? Violence Vict. 2005; 20(2): 207–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Foo L, Margolin G. A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. J Fam Violence. 1995; 10: 351–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Munoz-Rivas MJ, Grana JL, O’Leary KD, Gonzalez MP. Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health consequences. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 40(4): 298–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Foshee VA, Linder F, MacDougall JE, Bangdiwala S. Gender differences in the longitudinal predictors of adolescent dating violence. Prev Med. 2001; 32(2): 128–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. O’Keefe M. Predictors of dating violence among high school students. J Interpers Violence. 1997; 12(4): 546–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wolfe DA, Scott K, Reitzel-Jaffe D, Wekerle C, Grasley C, Straatman AL. Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychol Assess. 2001; 13(2): 277–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Harned M. A multivariate analysis of risk markers for dating violence victimization. J Interpers Violence. 2002; 17: 1179–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Luthra R, Gidycz C. Dating violence among college men and women. J Interpers Violence. 2006; 21: 717–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wolf K, Foshee V. Family violence, anger expression styles, and adolescent dating violence. J Fam Violence. 2003; 18(6): 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Foshee VA, Linder GF, Bauman KE, et al. The safe dates project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12(5): 39–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Swahn MH, Simon TR, Arias I, Bossarte RM. Measuring sex differences in violence victimization and perpetration within date and same-sex peer relationships. J Interpers Violence. 2008; 23(8): 1120–1138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this publication was provided by awards from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U49-CE00740), the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1K01AA017630-01A1), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA025823), and a grant from the RWJF New Connections program. The Boston Youth Survey was conducted by the Harvard Youth Violence Prevention Center in collaboration with the Boston Public Health Commission (Barbara Ferrer, Executive Director), Boston’s Office of Human Services (Larry Mayes, Chief), and Boston Public Schools.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Community Health Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Emily F. Rothman & Renee M. Johnson

  2. Biostatistics Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Robin Young & Janice Weinberg

  3. Harvard Youth Violence Prevention Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Deborah Azrael

  4. Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Beth E. Molnar

Authors
  1. Emily F. Rothman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renee M. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robin Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Janice Weinberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Deborah Azrael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Beth E. Molnar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily F. Rothman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothman, E.F., Johnson, R.M., Young, R. et al. Neighborhood-Level Factors Associated with Physical Dating Violence Perpetration: Results of a Representative Survey Conducted in Boston, MA. J Urban Health 88, 201–213 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9543-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9543-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation