Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incarceration and High-Risk Sex Partnerships among Men in the United States

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incarceration is associated with multiple and concurrent partnerships, which are determinants of sexually transmitted infections (STI), including HIV. The associations between incarceration and high-risk sex partnerships may exist, in part, because incarceration disrupts stable sex partnerships, some of which are protective against high-risk sex partnerships. When investigating STI/HIV risk among those with incarceration histories, it is important to consider the potential role of drug use as a factor contributing to sexual risk behavior. First, incarceration’s influence on sexual risk taking may be further heightened by drug-related effects on sexual behavior. Second, drug users may have fewer economic and social resources to manage the disruption of incarceration than nonusers of drugs, leaving this group particularly vulnerable to the disruptive effects of incarceration on sexual risk behavior. Using the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, we conducted multivariable analyses to estimate associations between incarceration in the past 12 months and engagement in multiple partnerships, concurrent partnerships, and unprotected sex in the past 12 months, stratified by status of illicit drug use (defined as use of cocaine, crack, or injection drugs in the past 12 months), among adult men in the US. Illicit drug users were much more likely than nonusers of illicit drugs to have had concurrent partnerships (16% and 6%), multiple partnerships (45% and 18%), and unprotected sex (32% and 19%). Analyses adjusting for age, race, educational attainment, poverty status, marital status, cohabitation status, and age at first sex indicated that incarceration was associated with concurrent partnerships among nonusers of illicit drugs (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.22) and illicit drug users (aPR 2.14, 95% CI 1.07–4.29). While incarceration was also associated with multiple partnerships and unprotected sex among nonusers of illicit drugs (multiple partnerships: aPR 1.66, 95% CI 1.43–1.93; unprotected sex: aPR 1.99, 95% CI 1.45–2.72), incarceration was not associated with these behaviors among illicit drug users (multiple partnerships: aPR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79–1.35; unprotected sex: aPR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41–1.31); among illicit drug users, multiple partnerships and unprotected sex were common irrespective of incarceration history. These findings support the need for correctional facility- and community-based STI/HIV prevention efforts including STI/HIV education, testing, and care for current and former prisoners with and without drug use histories. Men with both illicit drug use and incarceration histories may experience particular vulnerability to STI/HIV, as a result of having disproportionate levels of concurrent partnerships and high levels of unprotected sex. We hypothesize that incarceration works in tandem with drug use and other adverse social and economic factors to increase sexual risk behavior. To establish whether incarceration is causally associated with high-risk sex partnerships and acquisition of STI/HIV, a longitudinal study that accurately measures incarceration, STI/HIV, and illicit drug use should be conducted to disentangle the specific effects of each variable of interest on risk behavior and STI/HIV acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McQuillan GM, Kruszon-Moran D, Kottiri BJ, et al. Prevalence of HIV in the US household population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination surveys, 1988 to 2002. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41:651–656 doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000194235.31078.f6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maruschak LM. HIV In Prisons, 2005. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arriola KR, Braithwaite RL, Kennedy S, et al. A collaborative effort to enhance HIV/STI screening in five county jails. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:520–529.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Commission on Correctional Health Care. Chapter 3. Prevalence of Communicable Disease, Chronic Disease, and Mental Illness Among the Inmate Population. National Commission on Correctional Health Care; 2002.

  5. Mertz KJ, Schwebke JR, Gaydos CA, Beidinger HA, Tulloch SD, Levine WC. Screening women in jails for chlamydial and gonococcal infection using urine tests: feasibility, acceptability, prevalence, and treatment rates. Sex Transm Dis. 2002b;29:271–276 doi:10.1097/00007435-200205000-00004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen JL, Bovee MC, Kerndt PR. Sexually transmitted diseases surveillance among incarcerated men who have sex with men—An opportunity for HIV prevention. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15:117–126 doi:10.1521/aeap.15.1.5.117.23614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardick J, Hsieh YH, Tulloch S, Kus J, Tawes J, Gaydos CA. Surveillance of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in women in detention in Baltimore, Maryland. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:64–70 doi:10.1097/00007435-200301000-00013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammett TM. HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, and incarceration among women: national and southern perspectives. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S17–S22 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000218852.83584.7f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adimora AA, Schoenbach V. Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:S115–S122 doi:10.1086/425280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schneller D. Prisoner’s families: a study of some social and psychological effects of incarceration on the families of Negro prisoners. Criminology. 1975;12:402–412 doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1975.tb00646.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowenstein A. Coping with stress: the case of prisoner’s wives. J Marriage Fam. 1984;46:699–708 doi:10.2307/352611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rindfuss R, Stephen EH. Marital noncohabitation: separation does not make the heart grow fonder. J Marriage Fam. 1990;52:259–270 doi:10.2307/352856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Browning S, Miller S, Lisa M. Criminal incarceration dividing the ties that bind: black men and their families. J Afr Am Men. 2001;6:87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Comfort M, Grinstead O, McCartney K, Bourgois P, Knight K. “You can’t do nothing in this damn place”: sex and intimacy among couples with an incarcerated male partner. J Sex Res. 2005;42:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FE, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR, Fullilove RE. Concurrent partnerships among rural African Americans with recently reported heterosexually transmitted HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:423–429 doi:10.1097/00126334-200312010-00010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MacGowan RJ, Margolis A, Gaiter J, et al. Predictors of risky sex of young men after release from prison. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:519–523 doi:10.1258/095646203767869110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson F, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR, Fullilove RE. Concurrent sexual partnerships among African Americans in the rural south. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14:155–160 doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(03)00129-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stephenson BL, Wohl DA, Golin CE, Tien HC, Stewart P, Kaplan AH. Effect of release from prison and re-incarceration on the viral loads of HIV-infected individuals. Public Health Rep. 2005;120:84–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grinstead O, Zack B, Faigeles B. Reducing Postrelease Risk Behavior among HIV Seropositive Prison Inmates: The Health Promotion Program. AIDS Educ Prev. 2001;13(2):109–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. 1997;11:641–648 doi:10.1097/00002030-199705000-00012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Manhart LE, Aral SO, Holmes KK, Foxman B. Sex partner concurrency: measurement, prevalence, and correlates among urban 18–39-year-olds. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:133–143 doi:10.1097/00007435-200203000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tyndall MW, Patrick D, Spittal P, Li K, O’Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT. Risky sexual behaviours among injection drugs users with high HIV prevalence: implications for STD control. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(Suppl 1):i170–i175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Epperson M, El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Orellana ER, Chang M. Increased HIV risk associated with criminal justice involvement among men on methadone. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:51–57 doi:10.1007/s10461-007-9298-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan MR, Miller WC, Schoenbach VJ, et al. Timing and duration of incarceration and high-risk sexual partnerships among African Americans in North Carolina. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:403–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan MR, Wohl DA, Weir SS, et al. Incarceration and risky sexual partnerships in a southern US city. J Urban Health. 2008;85:100–113 doi:10.1007/s11524-007-9237-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Farley TA. Sexually transmitted diseases in the southern United States: location, race, and social context. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S58–S64 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000175378.20009.5a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas JC. From slavery to incarceration: social forces affecting the epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases in the rural south. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S6–S10 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000221025.17158.26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Flanigan BJ, Hitch MA. Alcohol use, sexual intercourse, and an exploratory study. J Alcohol Drug Educ. 1986;31:6–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Robertson JA, Plant MA. Alcohol, sex and risks of HIV infection. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1988;22:75–78 doi:10.1016/0376-8716(88)90039-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Strunin L, Hingson R. Alcohol, drugs, and adolescent sexual behavior. Int J Addict. 1992;27:129–146.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fortenberry JD. Adolescent substance use and sexually transmitted diseases risk: a review. J Adolesc Health. 1995;16:304–308 doi:10.1016/1054-139X(94)00062-J.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Graves KL, Leigh BC. The relationship of substance use to sexual activity among young adults in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995;27:18–22, 33 doi:10.2307/2135972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hudgins R, McCusker J, Stoddard A. Cocaine use and risky injection and sexual behaviors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;37:7–14 doi:10.1016/0376-8716(94)01060-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shrier L, Emans S, Woods E, Durant R. The association of sexual risk behaviors and problem drug behaviors in high school students. J Adolesc Health. 1996;20:377–383 doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00180-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Castillo Mezzich A, Tarter RE, Giancola PR, Lu S, Kirisci L, Parks S. Substance use and risky sexual behavior in female adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997;44:157–166 doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(96)01333-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dinwiddie SH. Characteristics of injection drug users derived from a large family study of alcoholism. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38:218–229 doi:10.1016/S0010-440X(97)90030-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Iguchi MY, Bux DA Jr. Reduced probability of HIV infection among crack cocaine-using injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1008–1012 doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.6.1008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. The influence of psychosocial factors, alcohol, drug use on African-American women’s high-risk sexual behavior. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:54–59 doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00027-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Molitor F, Ruiz JD, Flynn N, Mikanda JN, Sun RK, Anderson R. Methamphetamine use and sexual and injection risk behaviors among out-of-treatment injection drug users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25:475–493 doi:10.1081/ADA-100101874.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Booth RE, Kwiatkowski CF, Chitwood DD. Sex related HIV risk behaviors: differential risks among injection drug users, crack smokers, and injection drug users who smoke crack. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;58:219–226 doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00094-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gorman EM, Carroll RT. Substance abuse and HIV: considerations with regard to methamphetamines and other recreational drugs for nursing practice and research. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2000;11:51–62 doi:10.1016/S1055-3290(06)60286-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, Lorvick J, Gee L, Bacchetti P, Edlin BR. Sexual transmission of HIV-1 among injection drug users in San Francisco, USA: risk-factor analysis. Lancet. 2001;357:1397–1401 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04562-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Strathdee SA, Galai N, Safaiean M, et al. Sex differences in risk factors for HIV seroconversion among injection drug users: a 10-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1281–1288 doi:10.1001/archinte.161.10.1281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. CDC. Drug-associated HIV Transmission continues in the United States. Accessed March 1, 2006. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/idu.htm. National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002.

  45. Friedman SR, Flom PL, Kottiri BJ, et al. Drug use patterns and infection with sexually transmissible agents among young adults in a high-risk neighbourhood in New York City. Addiction. 2003;98:159–169 doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00271.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Somlai AM, Kelly JA, McAuliffe TL, Ksobiech K, Hackl KL. Predictors of HIV sexual risk behaviors in a community sample of injection drug-using men and women. AIDS Behav. 2003;7:383–393 doi:10.1023/B:AIBE.0000004730.62934.ed.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Meade CS. Sexual risk behavior among persons dually diagnosed with severe mental illness and substance use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30:147–157 doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2005.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Belenko S, Peugh J. Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;77:269–281 doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.08.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Groves RM, Benson G, Mosher WD, et al. Plan and operation of cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 1. 2005;1–86.

  50. National Center for Health Statistics CfDCaP, US Department of Health and Human Services. Cycle 6 National Survey of Family Growth. Accessed December 6, 2007. http://wwwcdcgov/nchs/about/major/nsfg/nsfgcycle6htm.

  51. Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Davis KE, et al. National Survey of Family Growth, cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation; 2006.

  52. Pollner M. The effects of interviewer gender in mental health interviews. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:369–373 doi:10.1097/00005053-199806000-00008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Doherty IA. Concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:2230–2237 doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.099069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Doherty IA, Schoenbach VJ, Adimora AA. Condom Use and Duration of Concurrent Partnerships among Men in the United States; Sex Transm Dis. 2009 May;36(5):265–72.

    Google Scholar 

  55. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:940–943 doi:10.1093/aje/kwg074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zou G. A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702–706 doi:10.1093/aje/kwh090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Anderson RM, May RM. Epidemiological parameters of HIV transmission. Nature. 1988;333:514–519 doi:10.1038/333514a0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Anderson R. Transmission dynamics of sexually transmitted infections. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA, Lemon SM, Stamm WE, Piot P, et al, eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division; 1999:25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Potterat JJ, Zimmerman-Rogers H, Muth SQ, et al. Chlamydia transmission: concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1331–1339.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rosenberg MD, Gurvey JE, Adler N, Dunlop MB, Ellen JM. Concurrent sex partners and risk for sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:208–212 doi:10.1097/00007435-199904000-00004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Fenton KA, Korovessis C, Johnson AM, et al. Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Lancet. 2001;358:1851–1854 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06886-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Koumans EH, Farley TA, Gibson JJ, et al. Characteristics of persons with syphilis in areas of persisting syphilis in the United States: sustained transmission associated with concurrent partnerships. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:497–503 doi:10.1097/00007435-200109000-00004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jennings J, Glass B, Parham P, Adler N, Ellen JM. Sex partner concurrency, geographic context, and adolescent sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:734–739 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000145850.12858.87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gorbach PM, Drumright LN, Holmes KK. Discord, discordance, and concurrency: comparing individual and partnership-level analyses of new partnerships of young adults at risk of sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:7–12 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000148302.81575.fc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Bonas DM, Martinson FE, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR. Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States. Epidemiology. 2002;13:320–327 doi:10.1097/00001648-200205000-00013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Seal DW, Eldrige GD, Kacanek D, Binson D, Macgowan RJ. A longitudinal, qualitative analysis of the context of substance use and sexual behavior among 18- to 29-year-old men after their release from prison. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:2394–2406 doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Galea S, Vlahov D. Social determinants and the health of drug users: socioeconomic status, homelessness, and incarceration. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(Suppl 1):S135–S145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Greenberg GA, Rosenheck RA. Jail incarceration, homelessness, and mental health: a national study. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59:170–177 doi:10.1176/appi.ps.59.2.170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull. 1990;108:339–362 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kraut JR, Haddix AC, Carande-Kulis V, Greifinger RB. Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for sexually transmitted disease among inmates in United States prisons and jails. In: The health care needs of soon-to-be-released inmates: a report to the Congress, Volume 2. National Commission on Correctional Health Care; 2002. p. 81–108.

  71. Parece MS, Herrera GA, Voigt RF, Middlekauff SL, Irwin KL. STD testing policies and practices in U.S. city and county jails. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:431–437 doi:10.1097/00007435-199909000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported in part by NICHD 1R21HD054293-01A1 (to AAA). Maria Khan was supported as a postdoctoral fellow and Matthew Epperson was supported as a predoctoral fellow in the Behavioral Sciences Training in Drug Abuse Research program, sponsored by the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI) and Public Health Solutions with funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5T32 DA07233).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria R. Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, M.R., Doherty, I.A., Schoenbach, V.J. et al. Incarceration and High-Risk Sex Partnerships among Men in the United States. J Urban Health 86, 584–601 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9348-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9348-5

Keywords

Navigation