Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying Parkinson’s disease finger-tapping severity by extracting and synthesizing finger motion properties

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a novel index of Parkinson’s disease (PD) finger-tapping severity, called “PDFTsi,” for quantifying the severity of symptoms related to the finger tapping of PD patients with high accuracy. To validate the efficacy of PDFTsi, the finger-tapping movements of normal controls and PD patients were measured by using magnetic sensors, and 21 characteristics were extracted from the finger-tapping waveforms. To distinguish motor deterioration due to PD from that due to aging, the aging effect on finger tapping was removed from these characteristics. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the age-normalized characteristics, and principal components that represented the motion properties of finger tapping were calculated. Multiple linear regression (MLR) with stepwise variable selection was applied to the principal components, and PDFTsi was calculated. The calculated PDFTsi indicates that PDFTsi has a high estimation ability, namely a mean square error of 0.45. The estimation ability of PDFTsi is higher than that of the alternative method, MLR with stepwise regression selection without PCA, namely a mean square error of 1.30. This result suggests that PDFTsi can quantify PD finger-tapping severity accurately. Furthermore, the result of interpreting a model for calculating PDFTsi indicated that motion wideness and rhythm disorder are important for estimating PD finger-tapping severity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As for the PD patients, the measurement duration was 30 s. The finger tapping of the first 15 s was used.

References

  1. Agostino R, Curra A, Giovannelli M, Modugno N, Manfredi M, Berardelli A (2003) Impairment of individual finger movements in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 18(5):560–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alty J, Jamieson S, Lones M, Smith S (2012) How slow is too slow? objective measurement of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease using novel noninvasive devices. In: Movement disorders, vol 27, Wiley-Blackwell 111 River ST, Hoboken 07030–5774, NJ USA, pp S91–S92

  3. Bishop CM, Nasrabadi NM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Chap Principal component analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chou K, Hurtig H, Stern M, Colcher A, Ravina B, Newberg A, Mozley P, Siderowf A (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of [99m Tc] TRODAT-1 SPECT imaging in early Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 10(6):375–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins RC (1997) Neurology. Saunders Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Criswell S, Sterling C, Swisher L, Evanoff B, Racette BA (2010) Sensitivity and specificity of the finger tapping task for the detection of psychogenic movement disorders. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 16(3):197–201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Elble RJ (2005) Gravitational artifact in accelerometric measurements of tremor. Clin Neurophysiol 116(7):1638–1643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galna B, Barry G, Jackson D, Mhiripiri D, Olivier P, Rochester L (2014) Accuracy of the microsoft kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 39(4):1062–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goetz CG, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Stern MB, Tilley BC, Dodel R, Dubois B et al (2007) Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS): process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord 22(1):41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goetz CG, Stebbins GT, Wolff D, DeLeeuw W, Bronte-Stewart H, Elble R, Hallett M, Nutt J, Ramig L, Sanger T et al (2009) Testing objective measures of motor impairment in early Parkinson's disease: feasibility study of an at-home testing device. Mov Disord 24(4):551–556

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R et al (2008) Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 23(15):2129–2170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartmann A, Luzi S, Murer K, de Bie RA, de Bruin ED (2009) Concurrent validity of a trunk triaxial accelerometer system for gait analysis in older adults. Gait Posture 29(3):444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hermanns M (2011) Weathering the storm: living with Parkinson's disease. J Christ Nurs 28(2):76–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jolliffe IT (1982) A note on the use of principal components in regression. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 31(3):300–303

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kandori A, Yokoe M, Sakoda S, Abe K, Miyashita T, Oe H, Naritomi H, Ogata K, Tsukada K (2004) Quantitative magnetic detection of finger movements in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Res 49(2):253–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan T, Nyholm D, Westin J, Dougherty M (2014) A computer vision framework for finger-tapping evaluation in Parkinson's disease. Artif Intell Med 60(1):27–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Konczak J, Ackermann H, Hertrich I, Spieker S, Dichgans J (1997) Control of repetitive lip and finger movements in Parkinson's disease: influence of external timing signals and simultaneous execution on motor performance. Mov Disord 12(5):665–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kortier HG, Sluiter VI, Roetenberg D, Veltink PH (2014) Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11(1):70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ling H, Massey LA, Lees AJ, Brown P, Day BL (2012) Hypokinesia without decrement distinguishes progressive supranuclear palsy from Parkinson's disease. Brain 135(4):1141–1153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Memedi M, Khan T, Grenholm P, Nyholm D, Westin J (2013) Automatic and objective assessment of alternating tapping performance in Parkinson's disease. Sensors 13(12):16965–16984

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore ST, MacDougall HG, Gracies JM, Cohen HS, Ondo WG (2007) Long-term monitoring of gait in Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 26(2):200–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakamura R, Nagasaki H, Narabayashi H (1978) Disturbances of rhythm formation in patients with Parkinson's disease: Part I. Characteristics of tapping response to the periodic signals. Percept Motor Skills 46(1):63–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Okuno R, Yokoe M, Akazawa K, Abe K, Sakoda S (2006) Finger taps movement acceleration measurement system for quantitative diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. In: Proceedings of the twenty eighth annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 6623–6626 (2006)

  24. Richards M, Marder K, Cote L, Mayeux R (1994) Interrater reliability of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale motor examination. Mov Disord 9(1):89–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheather S (2009) A modern approach to regression with R, chap. Multiple linear regression (Chapter 5) and variable selection (Chapter 7), pp. 125.147 and 227–261. Springer, New York (2009)

  26. Shima K, Kan E, Tsuji T, Kandori A, Yokoe M, Sakoda S (2008) A motor function evaluation system for finger tapping movements using magnetic sensors. The Jpn J Med Instrum 78(12):909–918 (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shima K, Tsuji T, Kan E, Kandori A, Yokoe M, Sakoda S (2008) Measurement and evaluation of finger tapping movements using magnetic sensors. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008. EMBS 2008. 30th Annual international conference of the IEEE, pp 5628–5631 (2008)

  28. Shima K, Tsuji T, Kandori A, Yokoe M, Sakoda S (2009) Measurement and evaluation of finger tapping movements using log-linearized Gaussian mixture networks. Sensors 9(3):2187–2201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Siderowf A, McDermott M, Kieburtz K, Blindauer K, Plumb S, Shoulson I (2002) Test-retest reliability of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale in patients with early Parkinson's disease: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Mov Disord 17(4):758–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yokoe M, Okuno R, Hamasaki T, Kurachi Y, Akazawa K, Sakoda S (2009) Opening velocity, a novel parameter, for finger tapping test in patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15(6):440–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Jonghin Park at Osaka University and all the students at Hiroshima University for helping us collect the finger-tapping data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Sano.

Appendix

Appendix

Basic statistics of the data used in this study are shown in the following. The correlation between two age-normalized characteristics is shown in Fig. 8. PCA was applied to age-normalized characteristics that are correlated with each other to extract independent motion properties. The comparison between average of the characteristics of normal controls and PD patients is shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Correlation coefficients between two age-normalized characteristics. Characteristic numbers correspond to Fig. 3

Fig. 9
figure 9

Comparison between average of characteristics of normal controls and PD patients. Characteristic numbers correspond to Fig. 3. Averages (bar) and standard deviations (error bars) are standardized by average of the normal controls’ average to compare between characteristics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sano, Y., Kandori, A., Shima, K. et al. Quantifying Parkinson’s disease finger-tapping severity by extracting and synthesizing finger motion properties. Med Biol Eng Comput 54, 953–965 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1467-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1467-z

Keywords

Navigation