Skip to main content
Log in

Chinese college entrance examination: Review of discussions and the value orientation of reforms

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Education in China

Abstract

The retention or abolition of national college entrance examination (CEE) has triggered a fierce controversy in academe. Although controversial causes and focus vary from time to time, the result remains the same—adopting uniform national examinations and making it innovative all the time. Since CEE has political, social and educational functions, it is necessary not only to make CEE keep up with the times and actively reform, but also to uphold the principle of attaining the balance between change and steady, which is the only approach to maintaining CEE.

摘要

中国高考的存废引发了学术界的激烈争议, 虽然历次争议的原因与侧重点各有不同, 但争议的结果都是仍然采行以高考为主的办法, 争议也推动了高考的不断革新。 高考因兼具政治与社会功能而承载着沉重的社会责任. 。 高考既要与时俱进地积极改革, 又要秉持 “稳中求变” 的原则, 这是高考保持长久生命力的不二法门。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fang Y H (Jun. 14, 2004). Survey showed that college entrance examination has become the nationwide primary examination. China Youth Daily, the second page (in Chinese)

  • Gu WL (1997). College entrance examination: Is there a better way to go? Outlook News Weekly, (20): 37 (in Chinese)

  • Gu H B (2001). Critiques for college entrance examination in China: Tests as a product of central planed economy should wane). China’s Reforms, (10): 12 (in Chinese)

  • National Education Committee Test Centre (NECTC) (1994). Approaches for Ability Recruitment and Testing: America, Japan, and France. Beijing: People’s Post Press, 59 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang G Y (1997). College entrance examination is more likely to bring gospel to our society. Education Prospect, (3): 7; 16 (in Chinese)

  • Huang Q Y (2003). College Admissions in America. Beijing: Peking University Press; Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei Y (1997) Treasure tests. College Students, (10): 24 (in Chinese)

  • Lei Y (2004). Education and the society. Teacher’s Journal, (2): 8 (in Chinese)

  • Li J (1995). Questioning the “easy admission and strict graduation”. Research in Higher Education (Xiangtan University), (4): 6 (in Chinese)

  • Li P (1996). Easy Admission and strict graduation: A breakthrough in education reform in China—discussion with Li Jun. China Electric Power Education, (3): 9 (in Chinese)

  • Liu H F (1995). Traditional culture and reform of college entrance examination. Shanghai Research in Higher Education, (3): 42 (in Chinese)

  • Liu H F (1997). Why should uniform college entrance examination be insisted. Shanghai Research in Higher Education, (5): 45 (in Chinese)

  • Liu H F (2000). Enrollment examination and imperial examinations. Journal of Higher Education, 21(2): 42 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang S X (2003). Questioning the college autonomous recruitment program. Exploring Education Development, (10): 27; 28 (in Chinese)

  • Qu B K, Xiong C W (2003). On interpreting education: education is not the main cause of the phenomenon of “zero Nobel Prize winners” in the mainland of China. Peking University Education Review, 1(1): 15 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun S Z (1998). Abolishing nationwide uniform college entrance examination. Arts and Life, (6): 13 (in Chinese)

  • Tang A G (1995). Reformation is the challenge to traditional culture: Discussing with Liu Haifeng. Shanghai Research in Higher Education, (5): 50 (in Chinese)

  • Yang X W (1997). 40 Years of college entrance examination, I. China Examinations, (1): 7 (in Chinese)

  • Yang X W (1999). College entrance examination reform and China’s national conditions. Qiushi Journal, (5): 33 (in Chinese)

  • Yang X W (2001). Research on Examination Reforms in China. Beijing: Peking University Press, 106 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X W ed. (2003). Documentations about College Entrance Examination, I. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 227–234; 243–244(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao J Z (2003). Discussions on problems with trials of college autonomous recruitment. China Higher Education Research, (7): 34; 35 (in Chinese)

  • Zhang Y Q (1996). Comment on and analysis of the easy admission and the strict Graduation—a discussion with Tang Anguo. China Electric Power Education, (4): 26 (in Chinese)

  • Zheng R L (2007). What we will learn from the enrollment system of American Universities. Southeast Academic Research, (3): 157 (in Chinese)

  • Zhou D P (2004). How to make breakthroughs in the college autonomous recruitment. Outlook News Weekly, (17): 56 (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Ruoling.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Zhaosheng Kaoshi Yanjiu 招生考试研究 (Admission & Examination Research), 2007, (1): 1–8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, R. Chinese college entrance examination: Review of discussions and the value orientation of reforms. Front. Educ. China 3, 137–148 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-008-0009-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-008-0009-3

Keywords

关键词

Navigation