Introduction

Suicide is a major and complex public health issue, the risk of which increases throughout adolescence (aged 15–19 years) and is consistently ranked among the leading causes of death worldwide (Mars et al., 2019). The immense research efforts to date contribute to understanding of the risk factors related to suicidal behavior in adolescents. However, they are limited in their capability to enhance the prediction for future suicide and distinguish between suicide ideators and suicide attempters (May and Klonsky 2016). In order to address these limitations, a new generation of theories emerged. The ideation-to-action framework provided an integrative framework to inform suicide research (Klonsky et al., 2016).

Moreover, three complex suicide theories, including the Three-Step Theory (3ST; Klonsky & May, 2015), the Integrated Motivational Volitional Model (IVM; O'Connor, 2011), and the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (Joiner, 2005; Van Orden et al., 2011), are situated within this framework. These are theories that address the development of suicidal ideation and the progression from it to the suicide attempt. According to this framework, the progression of suicide ideation is a distinct process starting with suicide ideation progression and leading to possible suicide attempts with their specific conceptualizations and predictors (Zareian & Klonsky, 2020). Therefore, identifying risk factors for suicidal ideation during adolescence is essential for suicide prevention. One such potential risk factor is body dissatisfaction. Similar to suicidality, body dissatisfaction prevalence appears to peak during adolescence. While adolescents may be more vulnerable to psychopathology and suicide behavior (Costanza et al., 2020), adolescence is a crucial developmental stage for the onset of suicidal ideation (Voss et al., 2019).

Body Dissatisfaction

Body dissatisfaction refers to an individual’s negative feelings or thoughts about their body, including negative judgments about size, shape, and muscle tone (Cash & Smolak, 2011& Cash, 2012). According to the sociocultural model (Thompson et al., 1999), adolescents internalize appearance ideals based on feedback to related ideal bodies, provided by different social resources such as their parents and peers. Body dissatisfaction generally involves a negatively perceived discrepancy between individuals’ evaluation of their actual and standard or ideal body and is the core mechanism of various eating disorders (American Psychiatric Association [APA] 2013). Given that suicide is one of the principal causes of mortality among individuals with eating disorders (Bhatt-Poulose et al., 2016; Greydanus & Apple, 2011; Rufino et al., 2018), it can be hypothesized that body dissatisfaction is linked to suicide, a link that has already been directly and indirectly identified (Kim & Kim, 2009; Perkins & Brausch, 2019; Peterson et al., 2017). Among adolescents, body dissatisfaction predicts suicidal ideation progression beyond depression and hopelessness (Muehlenkamp & Brausch, 2012). Also, suicidal adolescents report higher levels of body dissatisfaction and negative body feelings and lower body care and body assurance levels than non-suicidal adolescents (Brausch & Muehlenkamp, 2007; Orbach et al., 2006). The negative impact of body dissatisfaction on mental health is well documented. For example, body dissatisfaction is closely related to the development of depressive symptoms (Bornioli et al., 2020), anxiety (Vannucci & Ohannessian, 2018), lower self-esteem (Paxton et al., 2006), eating disorders (Freire et al., 2020), and psychological distress (Griffiths et al., 2016), but has not received significant attention in identifying effective adaptive strategies in the face of body dissatisfaction. Despite the role of body image perception (e.g., body dissatisfaction, body shame) as a risk factor for suicidal ideation (Perkins et al., 2021), few studies have investigated this relationship. Particularly among boys, body dissatisfaction has rarely been deemed a problem, nor has it been given adequate attention within the body image field (Bucchianeri, & Neumark-Sztainer, 2014).

Self-Compassion

To date, suicide studies have focused on the existence of risk factors, so there is a solid understanding of how these factors interact and contribute to risk. Despite significant breakthroughs in scientific understanding of the psychology of suicide, there are still many gaps in knowledge. The evidence on factors that could protect against suicide risk is particularly limited. The fact remains that most of the young adolescents suffering from psychopathology do not kill themselves. Therefore, although psychopathology is a major risk factor, it is not enough to explain the complexity of suicidal behavior. Although several established and helpful risk-reduction interventions are available in preventing suicide, identifying the protective factors has received less attention, and even less effort has been devoted to the role of protective factors in research and clinical practice. To counter the conventional approach emphasis toward disorders (e.g., risk factors and maladaptation), an important trend within psychology is the concentration on “positive psychology” (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). Consistent with this trend, some scholars in the field of positive youth development (PYD) examining adolescence and youth have progressively incorporated a strengths-based approach, which seeks to strengthen the adolescent’s assets to respond to developmental challenges adaptively. Also, research recognizes psychosocial characteristics and protective components, which are associated with reduced problems and increased well-being among adolescents (Lerner et al., 2015).

Self-compassion, a relatively new concept in psychology, has been defined as representing the balance between decreased negative and increased positive self-responding (Neff, 2003, 2016). Self-compassion is a multi-faceted construct with six dimensions: self-kindness, mindfulness, common humanity (positive self-responding), self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification (negative self-responding). The six components conceptually refer to different strategies and a range of individual responses that are implicated in difficult situations (Neff et al., 2019; Neff et al., 2021). The role of self-compassion is well-documented as a protective factor against the development, occurrence, and prevention of risk factors related to eating disorders and body dissatisfaction (Albertson et al., 2014; Barnett & Sharp, 2016; Linardon et al., 2020; Turk & Waller, 2020). Individuals with adverse childhood experiences may benefit from self-compassion as a protective factor against negative mood, weight, and eating-related consequences in the future. Because of this, self-compassion may be a significant intervention target for those who have had traumatic childhood experiences.

Self-compassion research has predominantly been conducted utilizing adult samples (e.g., university students). However, there is growing evidence that self-compassion could benefit adolescents (Cheang et al. 2019; Neff & McGehee, 2010). More specifically, empirical studies indicate that self-compassion is a protective factor against anxiety (Gill et al., 2018), psychological distress (Pullmer et al., 2019), depression (Marsh et al., 2018), and post-traumatic disorders for adolescents. Self-compassion may also play a crucial role during traumatic events in reducing adverse psychological consequents, particularly among vulnerable groups such as children (Coyne et al., 2020). According to cross-sectional and experimental studies, the greater levels of self-compassion are associated with greater levels of positive outlook, satisfaction with the body, and specific goal achievement, as well as healthier physiological responses to stress and less depression or anxiety (Ferguson et al., 2014). However, the effect of self-compassion on suicidal ideation is understudied.

The Present Study

Body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation tend to arise during adolescence and are considerably affected by social and interpersonal factors. A recent systematic review suggested a potential association between previous infectious disease-related public health emergencies and increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior (Zortea et al., 2021). Suicidality is one of the most extreme outcomes of illnesses such as COVID-19 (Costanza et al., 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with problematic eating behaviors (Ramalho et al., 2021), lower physical activity (Puccinelli et al., 2021), and higher social media activities (Chen et al., 2021), all of which are risk factors in 3. Also, school closures, leading to considerable social isolation for students, have been considered one of the central factors in developing psychological health issues (e.g., lower social connectedness, higher social isolation, higher psychological distress, and higher depression), all of which can be risk factors for suicidal ideation (Sekowski et al., 2020). Therefore, understanding the factors that can help individuals cope positively with suicidal ideation is more critical than ever. Based on the positive youth development approach, to better understand the relationship between body concerns and suicidal ideation, researchers need to investigate the experiences of individuals’ resources (i.e., self-compassion) concerning the body concerns.

Despite the high prevalence of major mental disorders among adolescents, specialist services are disproportionately focused on adults. The present study was conducted to contribute to the growing body of empirical evidence of the benefits of self-compassion during adolescence. Therefore, moderation analysis was carried out to examine whether self-compassion moderates the association between body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation. More specifically, it was hypothesized that higher levels of self-compassion would act as a buffer against suicidal ideation for adolescents with higher body dissatisfaction levels. The second aim of the study was to examine the relationship between the three positive dimensions of self-compassion (i.e., self-kindness, common humanity, mindfulness) and the three negative dimensions of self-compassion (i.e., self-judgment, isolation, over-identification) with body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation. Using structural equation modeling, it was hypothesized that the (i) positive dimensions of self-compassion would be negatively related to body dissatisfaction and suicidality and (ii) negative dimensions of self-compassion would be positively associated with body dissatisfaction and suicidality.

Method

Participants and Ethics

The participants comprised a convenience sample of 580 adolescents recruited via a web-based learning platform. The participants’ mean age was 16.31 years (SD = 0.87, range 14–18 years), and 57.6% (n = 334) of the sample was female. Eligibility criteria included (a) being able to read and complete a consent form and online survey, (b) being fluent in the Chinese language, (c) providing informed consent (including from one of their parents or legal guardians), and (d) no history of suicide attempts or psychiatric disorders and (e) serious suicidal ideation. The present study, including procedures, was reviewed and approved by the first author’s university Ethics Committee. All participants provided online informed consent. Incorporating the STROBE checklist, the study was conducted from December 2020 to April 2021 (see Supplementary File 1).

Measures

Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire-Junior (SIQ-JR; Reynolds 1987)

The 15-item SIQ-JR was used to assess suicidal ideation. The items were rated on a seven-point scale from 0 (“I never had this thought”) to 6 (“almost every day”). The total raw scores range from 0 to 90. A higher score represents a higher severity of suicidal ideation. The scale’s reliability was very good in 5 (α = 0.88). For the present study, SIQ-JR total scores ≥ 31 were determined as indicating serious suicidal ideation.

Self-Compassion Scale-Youth Version (SCS-Y; Neff et al., 2021)

The 17-item SCS-Y was used to assess self-compassion among adolescents. The scale comprises six subscales assessing positive and negative dimensions of self-compassion. The SCS-Y items with items were responded on a five-point scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always) with negative dimensions reverse scored. The total raw scores range from 17 to 85. The total mean of the six subscale means was used to calculate a total score. A higher score represents a higher self-compassion. The scale’s reliability was very good in 5 (α = 0.87). The Chinese version of SCS-Y was translated and validated in the parallel study (see supplementary data).

Body Dissatisfaction Subscale of Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI 3; Garner, 2004)

The 10-item Body Dissatisfaction subscale of the EDI-3 was used to assess body dissatisfaction. Adolescents rated each items on a five-point scale from 0 (never) to four (always). The total raw scores range from 0 to 40. A higher score represents greater body dissatisfaction. The subscale’s reliability was very good in 5 (α = 0.83).

Demographic Variables

Participants were asked to indicate their age and gender. No other demographic information was asked for.

Procedure

Participant Recruitment

The participants were enrolled from Chinese secondary schools utilizing a convenience sampling method over 10 weeks. In 5, a survey was sent to 19 secondary teachers who were all fully aware of the research. A specific online link was generated for each teacher, which their own pupils could only access. Teachers briefed the students, who then read the study’s objectives and duration, assurances of anonymity, confidentiality, voluntary participation, and withdrawal without any consequences. Once the link was clicked, it led to an informed consent page that could be read and agreed upon before they proceeded to the survey questions. The provision of informed consent was provided by the students and their parents, teachers, or legal guardians. Parents could withdraw their children from the study by sending a note to the school. The teachers also assessed exclusion and inclusion criteria. Also, the teachers removed all student identifiers (i.e., personal data) before sending the online data to the research team.

To determine the sample size, a priori power analysis was performed for the moderation test using G-Power (Faul et al., 2009). The calculated sample size was 485 using α error of 0.05, a Power (1-β err prob) of 0.80, a small effect size (Cohens f 2 = 0.02), and three predictors. A total sample size of 580 was recruited in 5, which allowed for a 15% loss of data.

Data Analysis

Means and SDs were calculated for all continuous variables. Chi-squares and independent sample t-tests were used to calculate the gender differences. The absolute skewness and kurtosis values assessed the normality assumption. The multi-collinearity issue was evaluated by a variance inflation factor (VIF). Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were generated to calculate the variables’ associations. The absolute skewness and kurtosis values were less than two, and the VIF values (1 < VIF < 3) suggested the absence of any multi-collinearity issue.

Moderation Analysis

PROCESS model 1 (Hayes, 2017) was conducted to confirm whether overall individual abilities in six dimensions of self-compassion moderated the effect of body dissatisfaction on suicidal ideation, using mean centered values. The moderation model is depicted conceptually (Panel A) and statistically (Panel B) in Fig. 1. The interaction effects of body dissatisfaction and self-compassion on suicidal ideation were also investigated. An indirect effect was statistically significant when the calculated 95% bias-corrected confidence interval (CI) did not include zero. The 95% CI was generated by the bias-corrected method for the point estimate with 5,000 bootstrapped samples (Hayes, 2017). Also, to visualize the moderation associations, simple regression slopes were illustrated at three levels (mean minus one standard deviation, mean, and mean plus one standard deviation) as moderator variables (self-compassion), with the predictor (body dissatisfaction) as the independent variable and the suicidal ideation as the dependent variable (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Proposed model depicted conceptually (A) and statistically (B). X: Independent variable (body dissatisfaction). Y: Dependent variable (suicidal ideation). M: Moderator (self-compassion). XM: Body dissatisfaction × Self-compassion. Path c: Total effect of body dissatisfaction on suicidal ideation

Full size image

Structural Equation Modeling

Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to investigate the effects of self-compassion dimensions on body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation. Once the measurement models were fitted to the data, it was expected that the positive dimensions of self-compassion (including self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness) would be negatively related to body dissatisfaction and suicidality. Also, the negative dimension (including self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification) would be positively associated with body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation. The guidelines suggested by Hu and Bentler (1999) were considered in evaluating the goodness of fit the models (comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) > 0.95, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) < 0.06), PCLOSE > 0.05, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) < 0.06). The analyses were carried out using SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and AMOS version 24(IBM Corp) with a two-sided alpha level 5% level of statistical significance.

Results

Descriptive statistics of the main variables are shown in Table 1. Evaluation of the skewness, kurtosis, and VIF values showed the absence of severe violations of normality and multi-collinearity risk (see Table 2). There were no significant participant differences in respect to gender. Females reported significantly higher scores than males concerning body dissatisfaction (t [578] = 2.45, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.29). Age was significantly correlated with body dissatisfaction (r = 0.17; p < 0.001) (i.e., older participants had higher body dissatisfaction). There was a large correlation between body dissatisfaction and self-compassion (r =  − 0.43; p < 0.001, 95% CI [− 0.53, − 0.35]) and a moderate correlation between suicidal ideation and self-compassion (r =  − 0.36; p < 0.001, 95% CI [− 0.45, − 0.28]). Also, body dissatisfaction had a moderate correlation with suicidal ideation (r = 0.33; p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.23, 0.41]). Correlation matrix is represented in Table 2.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the sample (N = 580)
Full size table
Table 2 Correlation matrix of main study variables
Full size table

Moderation Results

The standardized total effect of body dissatisfaction on suicidal ideation was statistically significant, with a moderate effect size (Cohen’s f 2 = 0.14, 95% CI [0.16, 0.35]). The standardized direct effect of body dissatisfaction significantly predicted suicidal ideation. Also, the interaction effect of body dissatisfaction and self-compassion (body dissatisfaction × Self-compassion) significantly predicted suicidal ideations, β =  − 0.16, SE = 0.04, p < 0.001, t = 4.34, 95% CI [0.23, 0.42] and Cohens d = 0.05. Therefore, self-compassion partially moderated the link between body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation. However, the effect size for a direct effect of the body dissatisfaction on suicidal ideation was no longer significant (see Table 3).

Table 3 Moderation analysis
Full size table

The simple slope for each interaction effect is shown in Fig. 2. For individuals with low scores (mean minus one standard deviation) (β = 0.32, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001, t = 7.05, 95% CI [0.23, 0.42]), on moderator variables (self-compassion), and average scores (mean) β = 0.14, SE = 0.04, t = 3.43, p = 001, 95% CI [0.06, 0.22], body dissatisfaction effects on suicidal ideation were statistically significant. However, for individuals who scored higher (mean plus one standard deviation) on moderator variable, the effect was not statistically significant (β = 0.03, SE = 0.04, t = 0.50, p = 0.62, 95% CI [− 0.08, 0.13).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The simple slope for interaction effect body dissatisfaction and self-compassion on suicidal ideation. Note: SCS, self-compassion; SI, suicidal ideation

Full size image

Structural Equation Modeling

The SEM analyses are reported in Table 4. The analysis produced excellent model fits for positive dimensions of self-compassion (χ2/df = 1.5, CFI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.01, PCLOSE = 0.88 > 0.05, RMSEA = 0.01, 90% CI [0.001, 0.016]) and for negative dimensions of self-compassion (χ2/df = 1.5, CFI = 0.98, SRMR = 0.02, PCLOSE = 0.55 > 0.05, RMSEA = 0.02, 90% CI [0.011, 0.029]). Among the positive dimensions of self-compassion, self-kindness predicted suicidal ideation with a moderate effect size (Cohen’s f 2 = 0.15). Among the negative dimensions, self-judgment predicted suicidal ideation with a moderate to large effect size (Cohen’s f2 = 0.28) (Table 4 and Fig. 3).

Table 4 The standardized effects and effect size of structural equation modeling examining the relationship between the positive dimensions of self-compassion and the negative dimensions of self-compassion with body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Structural equation model of effects of self-compassion dimensions on body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation. Model A: Positive dimensions (including self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness). Model B: Negative dimensions (including self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification)

Full size image

Discussion

The present study investigated the self-compassion buffering effects in the relationship between body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation. It was hypothesized that body dissatisfaction would predict suicidal ideation. It was also hypothesized that the association between body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation would be moderated by self-compassion. The findings show that body dissatisfaction was associated with suicidal ideation, with moderate effect size, and that the association was moderated by self-compassion. The findings provide further support for the extant literature indicating that body dissatisfaction predicts suicidal ideation (Bhatt-Poulose et al., 2016; Greydanus & Apple, 2011; Kim & Kim, 2009; Perkins & Brausch, 2019; Peterson et al., 2017; Rufino et al., 2018). Failure to attain society’s standards for attractiveness may result in chronic and negative feelings and facilitate body dissatisfaction and social stigma. Negative body perception and feelings of unattractiveness are associated with affective disorder vulnerabilities, a sense of worthlessness, and hopelessness, all of which are predictors of suicide risk (Sick et al., 2020). As an individual skill, self-compassion plays a significant albeit modest role in suicidality. Self-compassion is considered learnable internal resources that can be enhanced via various therapeutic approaches (e.g., classic cognitive-behavioral therapy; Diedrich et al., 2014) and can be helpful in enhancing an individual’s psychological well-being and reducing the impact of negative consequences of stressful events (Pyszkowska & Rönnlund, 2021).

Self-Compassion

The study findings indicated that self-compassion buffered the effect of body dissatisfaction on suicidal ideation. Self-compassion appears to be effective in protecting against the impacts of negative body evaluation/comparison and body shame (Wollast et al., 2020; Callow et al., 2021). For most adolescents, self-criticism and self-attack are automation and habitual responses to rejection or failure, associated with suicidal ideation and psychopathological vulnerability (O’Neill et al., 2021). According to IMV theory (O'Connor, 2011), feeling entrapped can result from unpleasant and painful experiences (i.e., struggle with body dissatisfaction) and maladaptive responses (self-criticism and self-blame) when faced with unpleasant and painful experiences (body dissatisfaction, body shame). Less practical coping strategies, lower social support, and distorted cognitive biases contribute to developing entrapment feelings. Suicide ideation progresses when suicide is viewed as the only way the individual can escape from the entrapment. A stronger sense of self-compassion may be linked to feelings of control over stressors, facilitate adaptive coping, and be less likely to result in a negative attributional style. Especially in times of personal struggles, experiences of personal inadequacies, failures, and/or stressful life, self-compassion can reduce neuroticism and adverse effects through reductions in negative self-responding, such as shame and catastrophizing, a perspective that often leads to the development of hopelessness (Hayes et al., 2016; Li et al., 2021). In relation to the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide, Baertschi et al. (2018) reported that among the Big Five personality traits, lower extraversion and higher conscientiousness and lower extraversion were key predictors of the acquired capability for suicide.

The impact of body dissatisfaction on suicidal ideation was lower for adolescents with high self-compassion than for individuals with lower levels of self-compassion. The study findings replicate an increasing number of studies showing a negative association between self-compassion and psychopathology vulnerability (Werner et al., 2012; Pérez-Aranda et al., 2021). Additionally, adaptive emotion functioning such as self-compassion is a viable predictor of subsequent psychopathology in early adolescence than in later adolescence. Moreover, promoting adaptive coping strategies during early adolescence may reduce the risk of internalizing disorders in the later stages of adolescence and emerging adulthood. While self-compassion predicts optimism, there is evidence indicating that traits related to optimism, such as self-compassion, facilitate recovery from the impacts of trauma and other mental health symptoms (Nazari et al., 2021). Self-compassion is also beneficial for the psychological adjustment and may also improve biological functioning (Pyszkowska & Rönnlund, 2021). Self-compassion seems particularly relevant for those experiencing more negative life events. Self-compassion and its six subscales may address the different ways that individuals emotionally respond to suffering (with kindness or judgment), cognitively understand their predicament (as part of the human experience or as isolating), and the way individuals pay attention to pain (in a mindful or over-identified manner) (Zeller et al., 2015). Being (i) kind instead of harshly judging, (ii) aware in a mindful manner about painful experiences instead of avoiding, and (iii) connected instead of being isolated may offer positive coping strategies and act as buffers against psychopathology vulnerabilities (McKay & Walker, 2021; Nerini et al., 2019; Zessin et al., 2015). Self-kindness, non-judgmental attitude, and non-over-identification are all associated with decentring. Decentring refers to an individual’s ability to deal with beliefs and thoughts as the ephemeral or transient and subjective inner circumstances or events. Decentring is negatively associated with body dissatisfaction (Palmeira et al., 2014) and positively associated with body appreciation (de Wet et al., 2020). The mindfulness component of self-compassion is associated with self-objectification (Cox et al. 2016) and body shame and dissatisfaction (Adams et al., 2012). Another component of self-compassion is that common humanity may help to recognize that body imperfection is part of a more extensive human experience. Consistent with growing literature, self-compassion studies reported the significant associations between higher levels of self-compassion and lower levels of suicidal ideation.

Practical Implications

The present study’s findings have implications in preventing or reducing body dissatisfaction among adolescents and prevention and intervention of suicidal ideation among adolescents. Self-compassion programs may be effective interventions that help reduce body dissatisfaction and its consequences such as suicidal ideation. The present study’s findings support the cumulative buffering effect of self-compassion in inhibiting body dissatisfaction on suicidal ideation. The results suggest the potential positive influence of self-compassion being incorporated into therapeutic programs designed to reduce suicidal ideation. For example, a self-compassion intervention in a peer-group format or a school-based intervention to enhance self-compassion may be considered in future research. The adapted mindful self-compassion intervention for adolescents is an effective intervention to enhance connectedness (Bluth et al., 2016). Self-compassion interventions in family therapy formats (e.g., compassion-focused parenting as a form of parenting intervention [Kirby, 2019]) or in combination with social skill training programs may be potentially more robust interventions than standard intervention formats in reducing suicidal ideation and body dissatisfaction. Applying suicide interventions at a family level to adolescents may strengthen the intervention effects. However, there is little data concerning such interventions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, parents have played a critical role in early intervention for adolescents with eating disorders and need further support on how to (and how not to) speak with children about eating or body concerns. As schools reopen, adolescents should be taught how to cope with body dissatisfaction more effectively. Also, school mental health programs are important for all children, and targeted approaches will be necessary for those more severely affected by the psychosocial impact of the pandemic.

Limitations

The present study has several limitations, notably related to the participants recruited and the type of data collected. The study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, to minimize infection risk, online data collection was utilized rather than face-to-face methods. Data were collected using self-report instruments, which are subject to well-established common methods biases. However, the online data collection method tends to provide more honest and truthful responses than those utilizing offline and/or face-to-face methods (Griffiths, 2010). Also, the stressful pandemic situation may have been a confounding factor that elevated mental health problems and higher than usual daily psychological life distress among the participants. Finally, the study was cross-sectional. Therefore, determining causality between the study’s variables was not possible.

Conclusion

The findings make a significant contribution to the expanding literature on body dissatisfaction and suicidality among adolescents. Within the PYD framework, the study’s findings provide a foundation for future research regarding the combined role of body dissatisfaction and individual assets and suicidal ideation. The present study demonstrates the critical role of body dissatisfaction in the progression of suicidal ideation among both girls and boys. The findings suggest the potential positive cumulative influence of variables that could be incorporated into therapeutic programs designed to develop self-compassion as a way of inhibiting or preventing suicidal ideation among adolescents experiencing body dissatisfaction. The findings also support the importance of specific self-compassion components which could also be incorporated into prevention programs to reduce suicidal ideation. The findings empirically show that a higher degree of self-judgment is strongly associated with suicidal thoughts among adolescents, which must be systematically addressed in clinical studies on suicidal risk.