Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of Parental Mediation Model on Youth’s Problematic Online Gaming

  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Parental Mediation Model (PMM) was initially designed to regulate children’s attitudes towards the traditional media. In the present era, because of prevalent online media there is a need for similar regulative measures. Spending long hours on social media and playing online games increase the risks of exposure to the negative outcomes of online gaming. This paper initially applied the PMM developed by European Kids Online to (i) test the reliability and validity of this model and (ii) identify the effectiveness of this model in controlling problematic online gaming (POG). The data were collected from 592 participants comprising 296 parents and 296 students of four foreign universities, aged 16 to 22 years in Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). The study found that the modified model of the five-factor PMM (Technical mediation, Monitoring mediation, Restrictive mediation, Active Mediation of Internet Safety, and Active mediation of Internet Use) functions as a predictor for mitigating POG. The findings suggest the existence of a positive relation between ‘monitoring’ and ‘restrictive’ mediation strategies and exposure to POG while Active Mediation of Internet Safety and Active mediation of Internet use were insignificant predictors. Results showed a higher utility of ‘technical’ strategies by the parents led to less POG. The findings of this study do not support the literature suggesting active mediation is more effective for reducing youth’s risky behaviour. Instead, parents need to apply more technical mediations with their children and adolescents’ Internet use to minimize the negative effects of online gaming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/wiki/Confirmatory_Factor_Analysis

References

  • Atkin, D. J., Greenberg, B. S., & Baldwin, T. F. (1991). The home ecology of children’s televison viewing: parental mediation and the new video environment. Journal of Communication, 41(3), 40--52.

  • Azim DHBF, Zam NABM, Rahman WRA. (2011). Internet addiction between malaysian male and female undergraduate human sciences students of the International Islamic University Malaysia. The 6th International Postgraduate Research Colloquium, Malaysia, 58--74. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00424.

  • Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 16(Series B), 296--298.

  • Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2005). Parental mediation of undesired advertising effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(2), 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., Rozendaal, E., Moorman, M., & Tanis, M. (2008). Parent versus child reports of parental advertising mediation: exploring the meaning of agreement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, C. R., Robinson, D., & Turow, J. (1982). Determinants of parental guidance of children’s television viewing for a special subgroup: mass media scholars. Journal of Broadcasting, 26(3), 697--710.

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS (Second.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245--276.

  • Chen, C. (2010). Information visualization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(4), 387--403.

  • Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323--343.

  • Daud, A., Omar, S. Z., Hassan, M. S., Bolong, J., & Teimouri, M. (2014). Parental Mediation of children’s positive use of the Internet Azlina. Life Science Journal, 11(8), 360–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetrovics, Z., Urbán, R., Nagygyörgy, K., Farkas, J., Griffiths, M. D., Pápay, O., & Oláh, A. (2012). The development of the problematic online gaming questionnaire (POGQ). PloS ONE, 7(5), e36417. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036417.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: a conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1(1), 61–75. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11324078.

  • Duerager, A., & Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children’s Internet safety? London: EU Kids Online Network.

  • Fisher, D. A., Hill, D. L., Grube, J. W., Bersamin, M. M., Walker, S., & Gruber, E. L. (2009). Televised sexual content and parental mediation: influences on adolescent sexuality. Media Psychology, 12(2), 121–147. doi:10.1080/15213260902849901.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

  • Fujioka, Y., & Weintraub, A. E. (2003). The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child’s attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(3), 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin, J. (2012), “Name of tab”, Stats Tools Package. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com. Accessed 25 Sept 2014.

  • Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D.J., & Ortiz de Gortari, A. (2013). Videogames as therapy: a review of the medical and psychological literature. In I. M. Miranda & M. M. Cruz-Cunha (Eds.), Handbook of research on ICTs for healthcare and social services: developments and applications (pp.43--68). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

  • Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J. & Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Social networking addiction: an overview of preliminary findings. In K. Rosenberg & L. Feder (Eds.), Behavioral addictions: criteria, evidence and treatment (pp.119--141). New York: Elsevier.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersy: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1970). ‘Moral development’. In: P. H. Mussen (ed.), Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology, Volume 2. New York: Wiley, pp. 261--360.

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, K. (2011, October 11). Cyber-duped parents. Malay Mail. Kuala Lampour. Retrieved from http://www.cybersecurity.my/en/knowledge_bank/news/2011/main/detail/2089/index.html.

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapahi, A., Ling, C. S., Ramadass, S., & Abdullah, N. (2013). Internet addiction in Malaysia causes and effects. iBusiness, 05(02), 72–76. doi:10.4236/ib.2013.52009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1990). Attachment theory and religion: childhood attachments, religious beliefs, and conversion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(3), 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latif, R. A., & Sheard, J. (2009). Social skills among students while playing computer games in class: a case study in Malaysia. Paper presented at the future computer and communication, 2009. ICFCC 2009. International Conference on, 3-5 April 2009.

  • Lee, S.-J. (2012). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: effective for what and for whom? New Media & Society, 15(4), 466–481. doi:10.1177/1461444812452412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-J., & Chae, Y.-G. (2007). Children’s internet use in a family context: influence on family relationships and parental mediation. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(5), 640–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. H. (2008). Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology, 27(4), 217–233. doi:10.1007/s12144-008-9038-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581--599.

  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Olafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children Kids Online network. LSD, London. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lse.ac.uk%2Fmedia%40lse%2Fresearch%2FEUKidsOnline%2FEU%2520Kids%2520II%2520(2009–11)%2FSurvey%2FTechnical%2520report.PDF&ei=A_0lVMbpEdSgugTMkIG4BA&usg=AFQjCNHq-Mo-F_6u9jVgwTyQbAMVD2C2IQ&sig2=Dlc3369cJf0KlmftXHfxVg.

  • Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J. S., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children’s privacy online: how parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. (2009). Social bonds and Internet pornographic exposure among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 601–618. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124–143. doi:10.1177/009365099026002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A. I. (2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents, Media Psychology, 4, 207–230.

  • Nathanson, A. (2010). Using television mediation to stimulate nontraditional gender roles among Caucasian and African American children in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 4(2), 174–190. doi:10.1080/17482791003629644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: a comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(2), 181–202. doi:10.1080/17439880600756803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2011). Parental mediation of young children’ s internet use, 1–26.

  • Pápay, O., Nagygyörgy, K., Griffiths, M.D. & Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Problematic online gaming. In K. Rosenberg & L. Feder (Eds.), Behavioral addictions: criteria, evidence and treatment (pp.61--95). New York: Elsevier.

  • Peterson, G. W., & Hann, D. (1999). Socializing parents and children in families. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.). Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 327--370). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures, 8(2), 23–74.

  • Shek, D. T. L. (2005). Perceived parental control and parent–child relational qualities in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 53(9–10), 635–646. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7730-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, W., & Huh, J. (2011). Parental mediation of teenagers’ video game playing: antecedents and consequences. New Media & Society, 13(6), 945--962.

  • Shin, W., Huh, J., & Faber, R. (2012). Tweens’ Online Privacy Risks and the Role of Parental Mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 37–41. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08838151.2012.732135.

  • Smetana, J. G., & Daddis, C. (2002). Domain-specific antecedents of parental psychological control and monitoring: the role of parenting beliefs and practices. Child Development, 73(2), 563--580. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00424.

  • Soh, P. C.-H., Yan, Y. L., Ong, T. S., & Teh, B. H. (2012). Digital divide amongst urban youths in Malaysia – myth or reality? Asian Social Science, 8(15). doi:10.5539/ass.v8n15p75.

  • Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: a reinterpretation. Child Development, 71(4), 1072--1085.

  • Teimori, M., Hassan, M. S., Bolong, J., Tamam, E., Adzaruddin, N. A., & Daud, A. (2014). Re-examining parental mediation model for children internet safety. Journal of Language and Communication, 1(2), 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “instructive mediation”, “restrictive mediation”, and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(1), 52–66. doi:10.1080/08838159909364474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2014). Adolescent online safety: the “moral” of the story, (Cmd), 1258–1271.

  • Zin, N. A. M., Yue, W. S., & Jaafar, A. (2009). Digital game-based learning (DGBL) model and development methodology for teaching history. WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 8(2), 322–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahim Benrazavi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benrazavi, R., Teimouri, M. & Griffiths, M.D. Utility of Parental Mediation Model on Youth’s Problematic Online Gaming. Int J Ment Health Addiction 13, 712–727 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9561-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9561-2

Keywords

Navigation