Abstract
Within children’s mental health, there is an increasing demand for wider implementation of wraparound and other interventions that can provide comprehensive, individualized, family-driven care. Unfortunately, implementation has proven difficult because these approaches do not necessarily flourish within traditionally organized agencies and systems. This has highlighted the need for information about how mental health agencies and systems must evolve if they are to provide a hospitable implementation environment for these interventions. A first step in developing this information is through research that advances conceptual and theoretical understanding of the impact of contextual factors on implementation. At the same time, there is an immediate need for practical information to guide decision making and policy development in settings where implementation is being undertaken. This article describes a study of wraparound implementation that used a combination of qualitative strategies to meet both of these needs simultaneously. It is argued that these strategies are particularly well suited to the study of emerging practices that reflect—and help drive—transformation in mental health systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stroul BA, Friedman RM. A System of Care for Seriously Emotionally Disturbed Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center; 1986.
Deegan PE. Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 1988;11(4):11–19.
Burns BJ. A call for a mental health services research agenda for youth with serious emotional disturbance. Mental Health Services Research. 1999;1(1):5–20.
Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. DHHS Pub. No. SMA 96-3098. Rockville, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health; 1999.
New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America: Final Report. DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832. Rockville, MD: New Freedom Commission on Mental Health; 2003.
Rosencheck R. Organizational process: a missing link between research and practice. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52(12):1607–1612.
Fixsen D, Naoom SF, Balase KA, et al. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte. Florida Mental Health Institute. The National Implementation Research Network; 2005.
Hoagwood K, Burns BJ, Weisz JR. A profitable conjunction: from science to service in children’s mental health. In: Burns BJ, Hoagwood K, eds. Community Treatment for Youth: Evidence-Based Interventions for Severe Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
Mihalic S, Fagan A, Irwin K, et al. Blueprints for Violence Prevention. DOJ Pub. No. NCJ 204274. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2004.
Taylor L, Nelson P, Adelman H. Scaling-up reforms across a school district. Reading and Writing Quarterly. 1999;15(4):303–325.
Walker JS, Bruns EJ, Rast J, et al. Phases and Activities of the Wraparound Process. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University; 2004.
Faw L. The state wraparound survey. In: Burns BJ, Goldman SK, eds. Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children’s Mental Health, 1998 Series: Volume IV. Promising Practices in Wraparound for Children with Severe Emotional Disorders and their Families. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research; 1999.
Oregon Department of Human Services. AMH Practices: Approved and Under Review. Office of Addiction and Mental Health Services, 2007. Available at: http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/mentalhealth/ebp/practices.shtml accessed on January 29, 2007.
Bruns EJ, Walker JS, Adams J, et al. Ten Principles of the Wraparound Process. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University; 2004.
Burns BJ, Goldman SK. Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children’s Mental Health, 1998 Series: Volume IV. Promising Practices in Wraparound for Children with Severe Emotional Disorders and their Families. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research; 1999.
Walker JS, Bruns EJ. The wraparound process: individualized, community-based care for children and adolescents with intensive needs. In: Rosenberg J, Rosenberg S, eds. Community Mental Health: Challenges for the 21st Century. New York: Routledge; 2006.
Walker JS, Schutte KM. Quality and individualization in Wraparound planning. Journal of Child & Family Studies. 2005;14(2):251–267.
Burchard JD, Bruns EJ, Burchard SN. The wraparound approach. In: Burns BJ, Hoagwood K, eds. Community Treatment for Youth: Evidence-Based Interventions for Severe Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
Farmer EMZ. Issues confronting effective services in systems of care. Children and Youth Services Review. 2000;22(8):627–650.
Clark HB, Lee B, Prange ME, et al. Children lost within the foster care system: can wraparound service strategies improve placement outcomes? Journal of Child and Family Studies. 1996;5(1):39–54.
Malekoff A. Bureaucratic barriers to service delivery, administrative advocacy, and Mother Goose. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services. 2000;81(3):304–314.
McGinty K, McCammon SL, Koeppen VP. The complexities of implementing the wraparound approach to service provision: a view from the field. Journal of Family Social Work. 2001;5(3):95–110.
Walker JS, Koroloff N, Schutte K. Implementing High-Quality Collaborative Individualized Service/Support Planning: Necessary Conditions. Portland OR: Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health; 2003.
Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology. 1990;13(1):3–21.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
Walker D, Myrick F. Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research. 2006;16(4):547–559.
Charmaz K. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications; 2000.
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
Elmore RF. Backward mapping: implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly. 1980;94(4):601–616.
Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Starnes AL, et al. Building and Evaluating Family Support Initiatives. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 1993.
Friedman RM. A conceptual framework for developing and implementing effective policy in children’s mental health. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2003;11(1):11–18.
Fiorino DJ. Strategies for regulatory reform: forward compared to backward mapping. Policy Studies Journal. 1977;25(2):249–265.
Dyer C. Researching the implementation of educational policy: a backward mapping approach. Comparative Education. 1999;35(1):45–61.
Walker JS, Bruns EJ. Building on practice-based evidence: using expert perspectives to define the wraparound process. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57(11):1597–1585.
Bruns EJ, Suter JC, Leverentz-Brady KL. Relations between program and system variables and fidelity to the wraparound process for children and families. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57(11):1586–1593.
Boychuk Duchscher JE, Morgan D. Grounded theory: reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;48(6):605–612.
Kendall J. Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1999;21(6):743–757.
New freedom commission on mental health, achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final Report. DHHS Pub. No. SMA–03–3832. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 2003.
Cox KF. Examining the role of social network intervention as an integral component of community-based, family-focused care. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2005;14(3):443–454.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted with funding from the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR), United States Department of Education, and the Center for Mental Health Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (NIDRR grant number H133B990025). The content does not necessarily represent the views or policies of the funding agencies. The authors wish to thank the research participants for the insights offered during the interviews and feedback sessions described in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walker, J.S., Koroloff, N. Grounded Theory and Backward Mapping: Exploring the Implementation Context for Wraparound. J Behav Health Serv Res 34, 443–458 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-007-9054-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-007-9054-6