Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of delayed-JOLs and sentence generation on children’s monitoring accuracy and regulation of idiom study

  • Published:
Metacognition and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When studying verbal materials, both adults and children are often poor at accurately monitoring their level of learning and regulating their subsequent restudy of materials, which leads to suboptimal test performance. The present experiment investigated how monitoring accuracy and regulation of study could be improved when learning idiomatic phrases. Elementary school children (fourth and sixth-graders) were instructed to predict their test performance by providing judgments of learning (JOLs). They provided JOLs immediately after studying each idiom, after studying all idioms, or after studying all idioms followed by generating sentences in which the idioms were used. Correlations between JOLs and test performance showed that delayed-JOLs and delayed-JOLs with sentence generation were more accurate than immediate JOLs. JOLs after sentence generation also improved regulation of study compared to delayed-JOLs only. Analyses of JOL reaction times suggest that delayed-JOLs led children to retrieve the literal meaning of the idiom, whereas JOLs after sentence generation led children to focus on connections between studied information, contextual information, and prior knowledge. Sentence generation presents a promising method to improve regulation of study, and thus idiom learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica, 128, 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, R., Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1015–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 610–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, A., & Bell, M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1, 343–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., & Mackey, T. A. (1985). Elementary school age children’s comprehension of specific idiomatic expressions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 18, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognitive development (Vol. 3, pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., & Towse, A. S. (2008). To get hold of the wrong end of the stick: reasons for poor idiom understanding in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1538–1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., Towse, A. S., & Knight, R. S. (2009). The development of idiom comprehension: an investigation of semantic and contextual processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (1997). That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory & Cognition, 25, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, A. B. H., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. (2011). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 294–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children’s spontaneous allocation of study time: differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: a brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1915). Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 10, 507–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, C. R., & Chrysler, S. T. (1990). Surface forms, textbases, and situation models: recognition memory for three types of textual information. Discourse Processes, 13, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, P. (1982). The memorial consequences of generation and transformation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 539–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1001–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition & Learning, 4, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., Welsch, D. M., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). The easily learned, easily remembered heuristic in children. Cognitive Development, 24, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Ma’ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P. J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 1–17). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Children’s strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2012). The impact of retrieval processes, age, general achievement level, and test scoring scheme for children’s metacognitive monitoring and controlling. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlotz, A. (2006). Idiomatic creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1992). Children’s comprehension and production of idioms: the role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language, 19, 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1999). Idiom comprehension in children: are the effects of semantic analysability and context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levorato, M. C., Nesi, B., & Cacciari, C. (2004). Reading comprehension and understanding idiomatic expressions: a developmental study. Brain and Language, 91, 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., & Merriman, W. E. (2009). Persistent overconfidence despite practice: the role of task experience in preschoolers’ recall predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 152–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory & Cognition, 26, 959–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008a). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008b). Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1084–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the “Delayed-JOL effect”. Psychological Science, 2, 267–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–171). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., & Taylor, C. L. (2002). Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: a comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 384–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Visé, M., Lockl, K., & Nelson, T. O. (2000). Developmental trends in children’s memory monitoring: evidence from a judgment-of-learning task. Cognitive Development, 15, 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1116–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory & Cognition, 37, 529–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayed keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1267–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, M. H., De Bruin, A. B. H., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students’ metacognitive judgments and calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von der Linden, N., Schneider, W., & Roebers, C. (2011). The effects of summary production and encoding condition on children’s metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition & Learning, 6, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), grant 411.07.151. We thank Eva van Eekelen for assistance with data collection, Arno Muijtjens for help with data analysis, and Martine Baars, Luciana Falbo, Peter Stiers, and Bob Wilkinson for comments on previous drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariëtte H. van Loon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Loon, M.H., de Bruin, A.B.H., van Gog, T. et al. The effect of delayed-JOLs and sentence generation on children’s monitoring accuracy and regulation of idiom study. Metacognition Learning 8, 173–191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9100-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9100-0

Keywords

Navigation