Abstract
When studying verbal materials, both adults and children are often poor at accurately monitoring their level of learning and regulating their subsequent restudy of materials, which leads to suboptimal test performance. The present experiment investigated how monitoring accuracy and regulation of study could be improved when learning idiomatic phrases. Elementary school children (fourth and sixth-graders) were instructed to predict their test performance by providing judgments of learning (JOLs). They provided JOLs immediately after studying each idiom, after studying all idioms, or after studying all idioms followed by generating sentences in which the idioms were used. Correlations between JOLs and test performance showed that delayed-JOLs and delayed-JOLs with sentence generation were more accurate than immediate JOLs. JOLs after sentence generation also improved regulation of study compared to delayed-JOLs only. Analyses of JOL reaction times suggest that delayed-JOLs led children to retrieve the literal meaning of the idiom, whereas JOLs after sentence generation led children to focus on connections between studied information, contextual information, and prior knowledge. Sentence generation presents a promising method to improve regulation of study, and thus idiom learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica, 128, 110–118.
Ariel, R., Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1015–1021.
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68.
Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 610–632.
Bobrow, A., & Bell, M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1, 343–346.
Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., & Mackey, T. A. (1985). Elementary school age children’s comprehension of specific idiomatic expressions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 18, 245–257.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognitive development (Vol. 3, pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.
Cain, K., & Towse, A. S. (2008). To get hold of the wrong end of the stick: reasons for poor idiom understanding in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1538–1549.
Cain, K., Towse, A. S., & Knight, R. S. (2009). The development of idiom comprehension: an investigation of semantic and contextual processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 280–298.
Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354–373.
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (1997). That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory & Cognition, 25, 57–71.
De Bruin, A. B. H., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. (2011). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 294–310.
Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children’s spontaneous allocation of study time: differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274–296.
Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: a brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228–232.
Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.
Fisher, R. A. (1915). Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 10, 507–521.
Fletcher, C. R., & Chrysler, S. T. (1990). Surface forms, textbases, and situation models: recognition memory for three types of textual information. Discourse Processes, 13, 175–190.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
Graf, P. (1982). The memorial consequences of generation and transformation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 539–548.
Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1001–1013.
Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition & Learning, 4, 161–176.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: University Press.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D. M., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133–159.
Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.
Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). The easily learned, easily remembered heuristic in children. Cognitive Development, 24, 169–182.
Koriat, A., & Ma’ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478–492.
Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P. J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 1–17). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Children’s strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 325–340.
Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2012). The impact of retrieval processes, age, general achievement level, and test scoring scheme for children’s metacognitive monitoring and controlling. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 75–90.
Langlotz, A. (2006). Idiomatic creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1992). Children’s comprehension and production of idioms: the role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language, 19, 415–433.
Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1999). Idiom comprehension in children: are the effects of semantic analysability and context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 51–66.
Levorato, M. C., Nesi, B., & Cacciari, C. (2004). Reading comprehension and understanding idiomatic expressions: a developmental study. Brain and Language, 91, 303–314.
Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., & Merriman, W. E. (2009). Persistent overconfidence despite practice: the role of task experience in preschoolers’ recall predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 152–166.
Maki, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory & Cognition, 26, 959–964.
Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008a). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174–179.
Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008b). Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1084–1097.
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133.
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the “Delayed-JOL effect”. Psychological Science, 2, 267–270.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–171). New York: Academic Press.
Nippold, M. A., & Taylor, C. L. (2002). Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: a comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 384–391.
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.
Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 131–148.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
Schneider, W., Visé, M., Lockl, K., & Nelson, T. O. (2000). Developmental trends in children’s memory monitoring: evidence from a judgment-of-learning task. Cognitive Development, 15, 115–134.
Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1116–1129.
Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–184.
Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457.
Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534.
Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory & Cognition, 37, 529–540.
Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129–160.
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.
Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037.
Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayed keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1267–1280.
Van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351.
Van Loon, M. H., De Bruin, A. B. H., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students’ metacognitive judgments and calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 15–25.
Von der Linden, N., Schneider, W., & Roebers, C. (2011). The effects of summary production and encoding condition on children’s metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition & Learning, 6, 3–23.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), grant 411.07.151. We thank Eva van Eekelen for assistance with data collection, Arno Muijtjens for help with data analysis, and Martine Baars, Luciana Falbo, Peter Stiers, and Bob Wilkinson for comments on previous drafts of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Loon, M.H., de Bruin, A.B.H., van Gog, T. et al. The effect of delayed-JOLs and sentence generation on children’s monitoring accuracy and regulation of idiom study. Metacognition Learning 8, 173–191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9100-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9100-0