Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developmental changes in uncertainty monitoring during an event recall task

  • Empirical Study
  • Published:
Metacognition and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was conducted to examine developmental progression in children’s metacognitive monitoring competencies in the context of a complex memory task. 7- and 9-year-olds rated their confidence after answering questions in two different question formats (unbiased and misleading) and two different question types (answerable and unanswerable). Feeling-of-knowing judgments were gathered for questions that had previously been answered with “don’t know.” The results showed that children from both age groups appropriately differentiated between correct and incorrect answers to unbiased questions in their confidence judgments, between answerable and unanswerable questions, and appropriately showed lower confidence levels in their confidence judgments than in their feeling-of-knowing judgments. 9-year-olds proved to be further able to discriminate metacognitively between correct and incorrect answers to misleading answerable questions in their confidence judgments while 7-year-olds were not. The comparison of feeling-of-knowing judgments before correct and incorrect recognition indicated that metacognitive differentiation at the lower end of the uncertainty–certainty continuum posed problems for these age groups. The observation of an adult confederate modeling appropriate metamemory monitoring did not improve children’s metacognitive performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allwood, C. M., Jonsson, A.-C., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). The effects of source and type of feedback on child witnesses’ metamemory accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Bering, J. M. (2002). The evolved child: Applying evolutionary developmental psychology to modern schooling. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, E. C., Nelson, T. O., & Peck, V. (1988). Developmental aspects of the feeling of knowing. Developmental Psychology, 24, 654–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMarie, D., & Ferron, J. (2003). Capacity, strategies, and metamemory: Test of a three-factor model of memory development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 167–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., & Middleton, E. L. (2005). What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Allwood, C. M. (2000). Effects of reiteration, hindsight bias, and memory on realism in eyewitness confidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howie, P., & Roebers, C. M. (2006). Developmental progression in the confidence-accuracy relationship in event recall: New insights provided by a calibration perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology (in press).

  • Ibabe, I., & Sporer, S. L. (2004). How you ask is what you get: On the influence of question form on accuracy and confidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 711–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1998). The role of metacognitive processes in the regulation of memory performance. In G. Mazzoni & T. O. Nelson (Eds.), Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Ma’ayan, H., Sheffer, L., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2002). Developmental trends in children’s FOK judgments. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2003). Metakognitive Überwachungs- und Kontrollprozesse bei der Lernzeiteinteilung von Kindern. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A. E., & Zacchilli, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 723–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, R. H., & Swett, S. (1987). Metamemory for narrative text. Memory & Cognition, 15, 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migueles, M., & Garcia-Bajos, E. (1999). Recall, recognition and confidence patterns in eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparism of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advance in Research and Theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In A. P. Shimamura & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J., & Markham, R. (1998). The accuracy–confidence relationship in an eyewitness task: Anxiety as a modifier. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect, T., & Hollins, T. (1999). Feeling-of-knowing judgments do not predict subsequent recognition performance for eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, S. H., & Lange, G. (2000). Relationships among metamemory, motivation and memory performance in young school-age children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., Ghatala, E. S., & Ahmad, M. (1987). Test monitoring in young grade school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, C. H., & Renner, M. J. (2001). But I thought I knew that: Using confidence estimation as a debiasing technique to improve classroom performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Process versus content in eyewitness metamemory monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebers, C. M. (2002). Confidence judgments in children’s and adults’ event recall and suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 38, 1052–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebers, C. M., & Fernandez, O. (2002). The effects of accuracy motivation on children’s and adults’ event recall, suggestibility, and their answers to unanswerable questions. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 415–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebers, C. M., & Howie, P. (2003). Confidence judgments in event recall: Developmental progression in the impact of question format. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 352–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebers, C. M., von der Linden, N., & Howie, P. (2006). Favourable and unfavourable conditions for children’s confidence judgments. British Journal of Developmental Psychology (in press).

  • Roebers, C. M., von der Linden, N., Howie, P., & Schneider, W. (2006). Children’s metamemorial judgments in an event recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (in press).

  • Schneider, W. (1998). The development of procedural metamemory in childhood and adolescence. In G. Mazzoni & T. O. Nelson (Eds.), Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology: Monitoring and control processes (pp. 1–21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1998). Memory. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 467–521). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Schlagmüller, M., & Visé, M. (1998). The impact of metamemory and domain-specific knowledge on memory performance. European Journal of Education, 13, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Potenza, M. T., & Nebelsick-Gullet, L. (1993). Constraints on the calibration of performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreblowski, S., & Hasselhorn, M. (2001). Zur Wirkung zusätzlicher Motivveränderungskomponenten bei einem metakognitivem Textverarbeitungstraining. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 15, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., Henderson, R. L., & Fabricius, W. V. (1998). Developing organization of mental verbs and theory of mind in middle childhood: Evidence from extensions. Developmental Psychology, 34, 512–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2006). Developmental progression in the effects of social influence on children’s eyewitness performance and their metacognitive monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S., Roebers, C. M., & Schneider, W. (2004). Entwicklungsveränderungen in Konformität und in kognitiven Folgen sozialer Beeinflussung. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 36, 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. H., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2001). Interviewing children and adults: The effect of question format on the tendency to speculate. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. H., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2004). Indicating when you do not know the answer: The effect of question format and interviewer knowledge on children’s ‘don’t know’ responses. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M. (1977). Preschoolers’ understanding of memory-relevant variables. Child Development, 48, 1720–1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1986). Children’s comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent stories. Child Development, 57, 1401–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study was conducted as part of a research project on metacognitive factors involved in children’s event recall that is financed through a grant to the second author by the German Research Foundation (DFG-Gz. RO 1324/3-1). We grateful acknowledge the valuable comments from Kathrin Lockl, an outstanding expert in this field of research, on an earlier version of this article. We wish to thank Susanne Ebert and Yvonne Metz for their help with the data collection as well as the children, teachers, principals and parents for their cooperation and participation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Psychologie IV, Institut für Psychologie, Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 10, 97070, Würzburg, Germany

    Nicole von der Linden

  2. University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland

    Claudia M. Roebers

Authors
  1. Nicole von der Linden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia M. Roebers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole von der Linden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von der Linden, N., Roebers, C.M. Developmental changes in uncertainty monitoring during an event recall task. Metacognition Learning 1, 213–228 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-9001-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-9001-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation