Abstract
Multinomial processing tree models are widely used in many areas of psychology. A hierarchical extension of the model class is proposed, using a multivariate normal distribution of person-level parameters with the mean and covariance matrix to be estimated from the data. The hierarchical model allows one to take variability between persons into account and to assess parameter correlations. The model is estimated using Bayesian methods with weakly informative hyperprior distribution and a Gibbs sampler based on two steps of data augmentation. Estimation, model checks, and hypotheses tests are discussed. The new method is illustrated using a real data set, and its performance is evaluated in a simulation study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, J.H., & Chib, S. (1993). Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 669–679.
Ansari, A., Vanhuele, M., & Zemborain, M. (2008). Heterogeneous multinomial processing tree models. Unpublished manuscript. Columbia University, New York.
Atchison, J., & Shen, S.M. (1980). Logistic-normal distributions: Some properties and uses. Biometrika, 67, 261–272.
Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1986). The statistical analysis of a model for storage and retrieval processes in human memory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39, 129–149.
Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial processing tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57–86.
Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (2007). Using multinomial processing tree models to measure cognitive deficits in clinical populations. In R.W.T. Neufeld (Ed.), Advances in clinical cognitive science: formal analysis of processes and symptoms (pp. 19–50). Washington: American Psychological Association Books.
Bayarri, M.J., & Berger, J.O. (1999). Quantifying surprise in the data and model verification. Bayesian Statistics, 6, 53–83.
Boomsma, A., van Duijn, M.A.J., & Snijders, T.A.B. (Eds.) (2000). Essays on item response theory. New York: Springer.
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Erdfelder, E. (2000). Multinomiale Modelle in der kognitiven Psychologie [Multinomial models in cognitive psychology]. Unpublished habilitation thesis, Psychologisches Institut der Universität Bonn, Germany
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., & Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian data analyses (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gill, J. (2008). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Hu, X., & Batchelder, W.H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21–47.
Karabatsos, G., & Batchelder, W.H. (2003). Markov chain estimation methods for test theory without an answer key. Psychometrika, 68, 373–389.
Klauer, K.C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: a latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 1–31.
O’Hagan, A., & Forster, J. (2004). Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics: Volume 2B: Bayesian inference London: Arnold.
Rao, C.R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications. New York: Wiley.
Riefer, D.M., & Batchelder, W.H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318–339.
Riefer, D.M., & Batchelder, W.H. (1991). Age differences in storage and retrieval: a multinomial modeling analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 415–418.
Robert, P.C. (1995). Simulation of truncated normal variables. Statistics and Computing, 5, 121–125.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). In Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Rouder, J.N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 573–604.
Rouder, J.N., Lu, J., Morey, R.D., Sun, D., & Speckman, P.L. (2008). A hierarchical process-dissociation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 370–389.
Smith, J.B., & Batchelder, H.W. (2008). Assessing individual differences in categorical data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 713–731.
Smith, J., & Batchelder, W. (2009, in press). Beta-MPT: Multinomial processing tree models for addressing individual differences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
Stahl, C., & Klauer, K.C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267–273.
Stefanescu, C., Berger, V.W., & Hershberger, S. (2005). Probits. In B.S. Everitt & D.C. Howell (Eds.), The encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 4, pp. 1608–1610). Chichester: Wiley.
Tuyl, F., Gerlach, R., & Mengersen, K. (2009). Posterior predictive arguments in favor of the Bayes-Laplace prior as the consensus prior for binomial and multinomial parameters. Bayesian Analysis, 4, 151–158.
Wei, G.C.G., & Tanner, M.A. (1990). A Monte Carlo implementation of the EM algorithm and the poor man’s data augmentation algorithms. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 699–704.
Zhu, M., & Lu, A.Y. (2004). The counter-intuitive non-informative prior for the Bernoulli family. Journal of Statistics Education, 12. Retrieved June 19, 2009, from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v12n2/zhu.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported in this paper was supported by grant Kl 614/31-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klauer, K.C. Hierarchical Multinomial Processing Tree Models: A Latent-Trait Approach. Psychometrika 75, 70–98 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9141-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9141-0