Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patient safety in obstetrics

  • Clinical Review
  • Published:
European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

Obstetrical care providers are highly trained, highly skilled professionals working with complex systems in an unpredictable environment. Perinatal units have many built-in mechanisms that work to prevent errors from occurring. Unintentional failures usually are the result of a chain of events, almost never from a single cause or a single provider. Within most unintentional failures, there is usually no single explanatory cause for the event. Rather, there is a complex interaction between a varied set of systems, including human behavior, performance and interdependency, technological aspects, socio-cultural factors, and a range of organizational and procedural weaknesses. To enable meaningful analysis of the underlying causes of an adverse event, errors and near-misses must be made visible. The challenge lies in the integration of labor and delivery clinical core business with high-reliability organization principles. The human factors knowledge should be considered a required part of the undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Safety science and human factors engineering need to be applied to perinatal care, and each health care professional should be able to recognize the basic theories, rules, and principles. Business and industry provide many lessons for perinatal care when focusing on error prevention through standardization, information technology, and, last but not least, acknowledging the relationship between team-building and improved performance. This will allow all obstetrical caregivers to build and maintain confidence and competency in their daily clinical activities, which ultimately is believed to result in reduction of clinical error. This review on current patient safety issues as they are applicable to the field of perinatal care attempts to create a sense of urgency towards the creation of a safety-conscious culture in obstetrics. Such a culture fosters a collective approach of responsibility to learn and improve constantly. This process takes time to develop and requires dedicated and highly visible leadership support at every level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MD (eds.) (2000) To err is human: building a safer health care system. Committee on quality of health care in America, Institute of Medicine. National Academy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pearlman MD, Gluck PA (2005) Medical liability and patient safety: setting the proper course. Obstet Gynecol 105:941–943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320:768–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Expert Advisory Group, NHS (2000) An organization with a memory. Report of an expert advisory group on learning from adverse events in the NHS chaired by the Chief Medical Officer. Department of Health HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller LA (2003) Safety promotion and error reduction in perinatal care. Lessons from industry. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 17:128–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holden DA, Quin M, Holden DP (2004) Clinical risk management in obstetrics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 16:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lakasing L, Spencer JA (2000) Care management problems on the labour ward: 5 years experience of clinical risk management. J Obstet Gynaecol 22:470–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. White AA, Pichert JW, Bledsoe SH, Irwin C, Entman SS (2005) Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 105:1031–1038

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Groff H. (2001) Understanding CRICO’s perinatal claims. Harvard Risk Management Foundation FORUM 21:1–3 (http://www.rmf.harvard.edu)

  11. Simpson KR (2005) Failure to rescue. Implications for evaluating quality of care during labor and birth. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 19:24–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller LA (2005) System errors in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a case review. J Midwifery Womens Health 50:507–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knox GE, Simpson KR, Garite TJ (1999) High reliability perinatal units: an approach to the prevention of patient injury and medical malpractice claims. J Healthc Risk Manag 19:24–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanhope N, Vincent C, Taylor-Adams SE, O’Connor AM, Beard RW (1997) Applying human factors methods to clinical risk management in obstetrics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1221–1225

    Google Scholar 

  15. Young T (2005) Presidential address: human error, patient safety and the tort liability crisis: the perfect storm. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:11–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. (No authors listed) (1998) Sentinel events; approaches to error reduction and prevention. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 24:175–186

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reason J (2005) Safety in the operating theatre: Part 2. Human error and organizational failure. Qual Saf Health Care 14:56–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reason J (2004) Beyond the organizational accident; the need for ‘error wisdom’ on the frontline. Qual Saf Health Care 13:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrett J, Gifford C, Morey J, Risser D, Salibury M (2001) Enhancing patient safety through teamwork training. J Healthc Risk Manag 21:57–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cherouny PH, Federico FA, Haraden C, Leavitt Gullo S, Resar R (2005) Idealized design of perinatal care. IHI innovation series white paper. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts; http://www.IHI.org

  21. SaferHealthcare. Labor and Delivery Safety Collaborative. http://www.saferhealthcare.com

  22. Sexton J, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL (2000) Error, stress and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ 320:745–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM, Sheridan TB, Gandhi TK, Dwyer K et al (2006) A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 139:159–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Milne JK (2002) Managing risk, clinical error and quality of care. SOGC Bull 24:717–720

    Google Scholar 

  25. Knox GE, Simpson KR, Townsend KE (2003) High reliability perinatal units: further observations and a suggested plan for action. J Healthc Risk Manag 23:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lencioni P (2002) The five dysfunctions of a team. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, Wears RL, Salisbury M, Dukes KA et al (2002) Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training; evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res 37:1553–1581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grenvik A, Schaeffer J 3rd, De Vita MA, Rogers P (2004) New aspects on critical care medicine training. Curr Opin Crit Care 10:233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Elder NC, Hickner J (2005) Missing clinical information: the system is down. JAMA 293:617–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sutcliffe KM, Lewton E, Rosenthal MM (2004) Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med 79:186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Coiera E, Tombs V (1998) Communication behaviors in a hospital setting: an observational study. BMJ 316:673–676

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Geller SE, Rosenberg B, Cox SM, Brown ML, Simonson L, Driscoll CA et al (2004) The continuum of maternal morbidity and mortality: factors associated with severity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:939–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) (2003) Preventing infant death and injury during delivery. Sentinel Event Alert 30:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  34. McFerran S, Nunes J, Pucci D, Zuniga A (2005) Perinatal patient safety project. A multicenter approach to improve performance reliability at Kaiser Permanente. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 19:37–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Lasky RE, Helmreich RL, Crandell DS, Tyson J (2006) Teamwork and quality during neonatal care in the delivery room. J Perinatol 26:163–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. CRICO Risk Management Foundation. Teamwork failures in labor and delivery: closed claim abstracts. (http://www.rmf.harvard.edu)

  37. Johannsson H, Ayida G, Sadler C (2005) Faking it? Simulation in the training of obstetricians and gynecologists. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:557–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson S, Neal S, Clark V (2004) Clinical risk management in obstetrics: eclampsia drills. BMJ 328:269–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop (1997) Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:1385–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Leape LL (2002) Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med 347:1633–1638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ransom SB, Studdert DM, Dombrowski MP, Mello MM, Brennan TA (2003) Reduced medicolegal risk by compliance with obstetric clinical pathways: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 101:751–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ransom SB, Gell JW, Harrison M, McDonald F (1996) Implementation of a clinical pathway for cesarean section. American Journal of Managed Care 2:1374–1380

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ransom SB, McNeeley SG, Yono A, Ettlie J, Dombrowski MP (1998) The development and implementation of a normal vaginal delivery clinical pathway in a large multi-hospital health system. American Journal of Managed Care 4:7123–7127

    Google Scholar 

  44. Milch CE, Salem DN, Pauker SG, Lundquist TG, Kumar S, Chen J (2006) Voluntary reporting of medical errors and adverse events. J Gen Intern Med 21:165–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gandhi TK, Graydon-Baker E, Barnes JN, Neppl C, Stapinksi C, Silverman J et al (2003) Creating an integrated patient safety team. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 29:383–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jagsi R, Kitch BT, Weinstein DF, Campbell EG, Hutter M, Weissman JS (2005) Residents report on adverse events and their causes. Arch Intern Med 165:2607–2613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Neily J, Ogrinc G, Mills P, Williams K, Stalhandske E, Bagain J (2003) Using aggregate root cause analysis to improve patient safety. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 29:434–439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mueller Boyer M (2001) Root cause analysis in perinatal care: health care professionals creating safer health care systems. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 15:40–54

    Google Scholar 

  49. Berry K (2000) Root cause analysis in response to near miss. J Healthc Qual 22:16–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Vincent C, Stanhope N, Crowley-Murphy M (1999) Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study. J Eval Clin Pract 5:13–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zeeman GG, Aarnoudse JG (2006) Enhancing the safety of obstetric patients through systematic root cause analysis of reported incidents. J Soc Gynecol Invest 3: abstract # 796

  52. Wu AW (2000) Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ 320:726–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Van der Schaaf T (2005) PRISMA-medical: a brief description. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  54. CEMACH (2004) Why mothers die 2000–2002: report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. RCOG, London

    Google Scholar 

  55. AHRQ. Pregnant with danger. May 2005; http://webmm.ahrq.gov

  56. Johnson CE, Handberg E, Dobalian A, Gurol N, Pearson V (2005) Improving perinatal and neonatal patient safety. The AHRQ patient safety indicators. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 19(1):15–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. CRICO Risk Management Foundation. Protecting providers. Promoting safety. (http://www.rmf.harvard.edu)

  58. Scalli G, Donaldson LJ (1998) Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. BMJ 317:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  59. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2001). Clinical Governance advice 2: clinical risk management for obstetricians and gynaecologists. RCOG, London

    Google Scholar 

  60. Department of Health (2000) Building a safer NHS for patients. Department of Health HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  61. The National Patient Safety Organization (2001) Doing less harm. The National Patient Safety Organization, London

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hale RW, Gant NF (2004) The road to maintaining excellence. Obstet Gynecol 104:1–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Leape LL, Fromson JA (2006) Problem doctors: is there a system-level solution? Ann Intern Med 144:107–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Helmreich RL (2000) On error management: lessons from aviation. BMJ 320:781–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Association of American Medical Colleges (2003) Patient safety and graduate medical education. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. http://www.aamc.org/publications/patientsafetygme.pdf

  66. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2004) ACOG committee opinion: patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology. Int J Gynecol Obstet 86:121–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB (2004) Neglected ethical dimensions of the professional liability crisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(5):1198–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ryan MJ (2004) Patient safety: a matter of integrity. J Innov Manag 9:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  69. Cohen MM, Eustis MA, Gribbins RE (2003) Changing the culture of patient safety; leadership’s role in health care quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 29:329–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Frankel A, Graydon-Baker F, Nepp LC, Simmonds T, Gustafson M, Ghandi TK (2003) Patient safety leadership walkrounds. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 29:16–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Longo DR, Hewett JE, Ge B, Schubert S (2005) The long road to patient safety. A status report on patient safety systems. JAMA 294:2858–2865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Pronovost PJ, Weast B, Holzmueller CG, Rosenstein BJ, Kidwell RP, Haller KB et al (2003) Evaluation of the culture of safety: survey of clinicians and managers in an academic medical center. Qual Saf Health Care 12:405–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Schoolfield M, Orduna A (1994) Understanding staff nurse responses to change: utilization of a grief-change framework to facilitate innovation. Clin Nurse Spec 8:57–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Brennan TA, Gawande A, Thomas E, Studdert D (2005) Accidental deaths, saved lives and improved quality. N Engl J Med 353:1405–1409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Amalberti R, Auroy Y, Berwick D, Barach P (2005) Five system barriers to achieving ultrasafe healthcare. Ann Intern Med 142:756–764

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Leape LL, Berwick DM (2005) Five years after to Err is human; what have we learned? JAMA 293:2384–2390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Leape LL (2004) Errors are not diseases: they are symptoms of disease. The Laryngoscope 114:1320–1321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Berwick DM, Calkins DR, McCannon CJ, Hackbarth AD (2006) The 100,000 Lives Campaign. Setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality. JAMA 295:324–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Gerda G. Zeeman

Authors
  1. Gerda G. Zeeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerda G. Zeeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeeman, G.G. Patient safety in obstetrics. Eur Clinics Obstet Gynaecol 2, 51–61 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11296-006-0030-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11296-006-0030-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation