Abstract
Objectives
This research examines the effect of a dog-training program among juveniles ordered to a county juvenile detention facility in a large, Midwestern city.
Methods
A pre-test, post-test experimental design was constructed to examine changes in self-esteem, empathy, optimism, pessimism, compassion, and social competence between juveniles who were randomly assigned to the canine-assisted activity program and to the standard conditions of the detention center without access to the program. Two-way and repeated measures ANOVA models are used to assess the differential effect of the program.
Results
The dog-training program evaluated in this study did not differentially benefit nor did it harm participants in relation to juveniles who received the standard operating practices and procedures of the detention center.
Conclusions
Generalized conclusions about the effectiveness of dog-training programs in secure correctional facilities should not be made from this study. Despite the unique program model structure used in this study, the results demonstrate that once selection effects are mitigated through randomization, the mere exposure to a dog-training program does not translate to improved outcomes. The results raise more questions about the influence of selection effects on reported findings and stimulate inquiry on dog-training program models, research designs used to assess program effects, and the importance of intermediate interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baun, M. M., Bergstrom, N., Langston, N. F., & Thoma, L. (1984). Physiological effects of human/comparison animal bonding. Nursing Research, 33, 126–129.
Britton, D. M., & Button, A. (2008). Prison pups: assessing the effects of dog training programs in correctional facilities. Family Social Work, 9, 75–95.
Bryant, B. K. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53, 413–425.
Chianese, N. M. (2009). Girls, jails, and puppy dog tails: an evaluation of the new leash on life program. Dissertation, California State University.
Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Perceived effects of dog-training programmes in correctional settings. Journal of Forensic Practice, 16, 171–183.
Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2015). The effects of dog-training programs: experiences of incarcerated females. Women & Criminal Justice, 25, 201–214.
Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). The effectiveness of dog-training programs in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Prison Journal, 96, 854–876.
Currie, N. S. (2008). A case study of incarcerated males participating in a canine training Program Dissertation, Kansas State University.
Davis, K. (2007). Perspectives of youth in an animal- centered correctional vocational program: a qualitative evaluation of project pooch. Retrieved from http://www.pooch.org/documents/project-pooch-qualitative-eval.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2014.
Ey, S., Hadley, W., Nuttbrock Allen, D., Palmer, S., Klosky, J., Deptula, D., Thomas, J., & Cohen, R. (2005). A new measure of children’s optimism and pessimism: the youth life orientation test. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 548–558.
Fazel, S., Doll, H., & Langstrom, N. (2008). Mental disorders among adolescents in juvenile detention and correctional facilities: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 25 surveys. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 1010–1019.
Fournier, A. K., Geller, S., & Fortney, E. E. (2007). Human-animal interaction in a prison setting: Impact on criminal behavior, treatment progress, and social skills. Behavior and Social Issues, 16, 89–105.
Gilger, C. G. (2007). Cell dogs: No effect of dog training programs on prisoners’ self-efficacy. Dissertation, Emporia State University.
Harbolt, T., & Ward, T. H. (2001). Teaming incarcerated youth with shelter dogs for a second chance. Society & Animals, 9, 177–182.
Harter, S. (1985). Manual for self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
Hill, L. B. (2016). Becoming the person your dog thinks you are: An assessment of Florida prison-based dog training programs on prison misconduct, post-release employment and recidivism. Dissertation, Florida State University.
Hill, L. (2018). Becoming the person your dog thinks you are: an assessment of Florida prison-based dog training programs on postrelease recidivism. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1433564.
Hockenberry, S., Wachter, A., & Sladky, A. (2016). Juvenile residential facility census, 2014: Selected findings. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Holman, B., & Ziedenberg, J. (2006). The dangers of detention: the impact of incarcerating youth in detention and other secure facilities. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
Leonardi, R. J., Buchanan-Smith, H. M., McIvor, G., & Vick, S. (2017). “You think you’re helping them, but they’re helping you too”: experiences of Scottish male young offender participating in a dog training program. International Journal of Enviornmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), E945.
Merriam, S. (2007). Discovering project pooch: A special program for violent incarcerated male juveniles. Gilbert: Discover N' Education Research and Consulting.
Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 250–255.
Richardson-Taylor, K., & Blanchette, K. (2001). Results of an evaluation of the pawsitive directions canine Program Ottawa. Ontario: Correctional Service of Canada, Research Branch.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Seivert, N. P. (2014). Animal-assisted therapy for incarcerated youth: A randomized-controlled trial. Thesis, Wayne State University.
Steinberg, L. (2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 459–485.
Turner, W. (2007). The experiences of offenders in a prison canine program. Federal Probation, 71, 38–43.
van Wormer, J., Kigerl, A., & Hamilton, Z. (2017). Digging deeper: exploring the value of prison-based dog handler programs. The Prison Journal, 97, 520–538.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 16 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grommon, E., Carson, D.C. & Kenney, L. An experimental trial of a dog-training program in a juvenile detention center. J Exp Criminol 16, 299–309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9346-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9346-2