Abstract
Court-mandated batterer intervention programs are being implemented throughout the United States to address the problem of domestic violence. Prior reviews of research on the effectiveness of these programs have arrived at conflicting conclusions. This study is a systematic review of the extant research on this topic. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies that used matching or statistical controls were included. The results were mixed. The mean effect for official reports of domestic violence from experimental studies showed modest benefit, whereas the mean effect for victim reported outcomes was zero. Quasi-experimental studies using a no-treatment comparison had inconsistent findings indicating an overall small harmful effect. In contract, quasi-experimental studies using a treatment dropout design showed a large, positive mean effect on domestic violence outcomes. We discuss the weakness of the latter design and raise concerns regarding official reports. The findings, we believe, raise doubts about the effectiveness of court-mandated batterer intervention programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, D. & McCormick, A. (1982). Men unlearning violence: A group approach based onthe collective model. In M. Roy (Ed.), The abusive partner: An analysis of domesticbattering (pp. 170–197). New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.
Babcock, J. C. & Taillade, J. (2000). Evaluating interventions for men who batter. InJ. Vincent & E. Jouriles (Eds.), Domestic violence: Guidelines for research-informedpractice (pp. 37–77). Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E. & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analyticreview of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review 23(8), 1023–1053.
Berk, R., Boruch, T., Chambers, F., Rossi, P. & Witte, S. (1985). Social policyexperimentation: A position paper. Evaluation Review 9(4), 387–429.
Berk, R., Campbell, A., Klap, R. & Western, B. (1992). The deterrent effect of arrest inincidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. AmericanSociological Review 57(5), 698–708.
Brisson, N. (1981). Battering husbands: A survey of abusive men. Victimology 6, 338–344.
Chalk, R. & King, P. (1998). Violence in families: Assessing prevention and treatmentprograms. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
*Chen, H., Bersani, C., Myers, S. & Denton, R. (1989). Evaluating the effectiveness of acourt sponsored treatment program. Journal of Family Violence 4, 309–322.
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issuesfor field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cromwell, N. & Burgess, A. (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington,DC: National Academy Press.
Davis, R. & Taylor, B. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? Women andCriminal Justice 10, 69–93.
*Davis, R. C., Taylor, B. G. & Maxwell, C. D. (2000). Does batterer treatment reduceviolence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Washington, DC: National Institute ofJustice.
*Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of interventionsfor men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68,468–476.
*Dutton, D. (1984). Interventions into the problem of wife assault: Therapeutic, policy andresearch implications. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 16(4), 281–297.
Dutton, D. (1986). Wife assaulter’s explanations for assault: The neutralization of selfpunishment.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 18(4), 381–390.
Dutton, D. (1988). Research advances in the study of wife assault: Etiology and prevention.Law and Mental Health 4, 161–220.
Dutton, D. & McGregor, B. (1991). The symbiosis of arrest and treatment for wife assault:The case for combined intervention. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policyresponses (pp. 131–154). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
Eisikovits, Z. & Edleson, J. (1989). Intervening with men who batter: A critical review ofthe literature. Social Service Review 63, 384–414.
Feder, L. (1997). Domestic violence and police response in a pro-arrest jurisdiction. Womenand Criminal Justice 8(4), 79–98.
*Feder, L. & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court mandated counseling fordomestic violence offenders: The Broward Experiment. Justice Quarterly 19(2), 343–375.
Feder, L. & Forde, D. (2000). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling fordomestic violence offenders: The Broward Experiment (Final report, Grant NIJ-96-WTNX-0008). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Farley, D. & Magill, J. (1988). An evaluation of a group program for men who batter. SocialWork With Groups 11(3), 53–65.
Feazell, C., Mayers, R. & Deschner, J. (1984). Services for men who batter: Implications forprograms and policies. Family Relations 33, 217–223.
Ford, D. & Regoli, M. J. (1993). The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters. In Z. Hilton(Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation (pp. 127–164).Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gondolf, E. (1987). Evaluating programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects.Journal of Family Violence 2(1), 95–108.
Goolkasian, G. (1986). Confronting domestic violence: The role of criminal court judges.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
*Gordon, J. A. & Moriarty, L. J. (2003). The effects of domestic violence batterer treatmenton domestic violence batterer treatment and domestic violence recidivism. CriminalJustice and Behavior 30(1), 118–134.
Hamberger, L. K. & Hastings, J. (1989). Counseling male spouse abusers: Characteristics oftreatment completers and dropouts. Violence and Victims 4(1), 275–286.
Hamberger, L. K. & Hastings, J. (1993). Court-mandated treatment of men who assault theirpartner. In Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation(pp. 188–229). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
*Harrell, A. (1991). Evaluation of court-ordered treatment for domestic violence offenders(Final report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Hasselblad, V. & Hedges, L. V. (1995). Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests.Psychological Bulletin 117, 167–178.
Healey, K. & Smith, C. (1998). Batterer programs: What criminal justice agencies need toknow. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Healey, K., Smith, C. & O’Sullivan, C. (1998). Batterer intervention: Program approachesand criminal justice strategies. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
Hilberman, E. (1980). Overview: The “wife-beater’s wife” reconsidered. American Journalof Psychiatry 137(11), 1336–1347.
Hirschel, J. D. & Hutchinson, I. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: TheCharlotte, North Carolina Experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 83(1),73–119.
Hotaling, G. & Sugarman, D. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wifeviolence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims 1(2), 101–124.
Jennings, J. (1987). History and issues in the treatment of battering men: A case forunstructured group therapy. Journal of Family Violence 2(3), 193–213.
Johnson, J. & Kanzler, D. (1993). Treating domestic violence: Evaluating the effectivenessof a domestic violence diversion program. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 15, 271–289.
*Jones, A. S. & Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Assessing the effect of batterer program completionon reassault: An instrumental variables analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18(1), 71–98.
Langan, P. & Innes, C. (1986). Preventing domestic violence against women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587, 16–30.
Miller, T., Cohen, M. & Wiersema, B. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: A new look.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
*Palmer, S., Brown, R. & Barrera, M. (1992). Group treatment program for abusivehusbands: Long-term evaluation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 62(2), 276–283.
Pence, E. (1983). The Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Project. Hamline Law Review 6,247–275.
Pirog-Good, M. & Stets-Kealey, J. (1985). Male batterers and battering prevention programs:A national survey. Response. 8, 8–12.
Rennison, C. R. & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence. Washington, DC:National Institute of Justice.
Roberts, A. (1982). A national survey of services for batterers. In Maria Roy (Ed.), Theabusive partner: An analysis of domestic battering (pp. 230–243). New York: VanNostrand-Reinhold.
Rosenfeld, B. (1992). Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clinical Psychology Review12, 205–226.
Saunders, D. (1996). Interventions for men who batter: Do we know what works? InSession: Psychotherapy in Practice 2(3), 81–93.
Sherman, L. (1992). The influence of criminology on criminal law: Evaluating arrests formisdemeanor domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 83, 1–45.
Snyder, D. & Scheer, N. (1981). Predicting disposition following brief residence at a shelterfor battered women. American Journal of Community Psychology 9, 559–566.
Sonkin, D. J. (1988). The male batterer: Clinical and research issues. Violence and Victims3(1), 65–79.
Straus, M. (1991). Conceptualization and measurement of battering: Implications for publicpolicy. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policy responses (pp. 19–47). Cincinnati,OH: Anderson.
Straus, M., Hamby, S., Boney-McCoy, S. & Sugarman, D. (1996). The revised ConflictTactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal ofFamily Issues 17(3), 283–316.
Sullivan, C., Rumptz, M., Campbell, R., Eby, K. & Davidson, W. (1996). Retainingparticipants in longitudinal community research: A comprehensive protocol. Journal ofApplied Behavioral Science 32(3), 262–276.
*Syers, M. & Edleson, J. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justiceintervention in woman abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 7, 490–502.
Taylor, B., Davis, R. & Maxwell, C. (2001). The effects of a group batterer treatmentprogram: A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Justice Quarterly 18(1), 171–201.
Tjaden, P. & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female andfemale-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence AgainstWomen Survey. Violence Against Women 6(2), 142–161.
Tolman, R. & Bennett, L. (1990). A review of quantitative research on men who batter.Journal of Interpersonal Violence 5, 87–118.
Tolman, R. & Edleson, J. (1995). Intervention for men who batter: A review of research.In S. Stith & M. Straus (Eds.), Understanding partner violence: Prevalence, causes,consequences and solutions (pp. 262–273). Minneapolis, MN: National Council onFamily Relations.
Weisburd, D., Lum, C. & Petrosino, A. (2001). Does research design affect study outcomesin criminal justice? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578, 50–70.
Widom, C. S. (1992). The cycle of violence. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
Zorza, J. (2003). New research: Broward County Experiment shows no benefit from battererintervention programs. Domestic Violence Report 8, 23–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feder, L., Wilson, D.B. A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior?. J Exp Criminol 1, 239–262 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0