Abstract
The categorical perception of tones is based not only on word-internal F0 cues but also on external F0 cues in the contexts. The present study focuses on the effects of different types of preceding contexts on Mandarin tone perception. In the experiment, subjects were required to identify a target tone with the preceding context. The target tone was from a tone continuum ranging from Mandarin Tone 1 (high-level tone) to Tone 2 (mid-rising tone). It was preceded by four types of contexts (normal speech, reversal speech, fine-structure sound, and non-speech) with different mean F0 values. Results indicate that the categorical perception of Mandarin tones is influenced only by the normal speech context, and the effect is contrastive. For instance, in a normal speech context with a higher mean F0, the following tone is more likely to be perceived as a lower-frequency tone (Tone 2), whereas with a lower mean F0, the following tone is more likely to be perceived as a higher-frequency tone (Tone 1). These findings suggest that Mandarin tone normalization is mediated by speech-specific processes and that the speech context needs to be intelligible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1972). The many uses of F0. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Linguistics and phonetics to the memory of Pierre Delattre (pp. 487–503). The Hague: Mouton.
Peng, G. (2006). Temporal and tonal aspects of Chinese syllables: a corpus-based comparative study of Mandarin and Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 34(1), 134–154.
Francis, A., Ciocca, V., Wong, N., Leung, W., & Chu, P. (2006). Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1712–1726.
Wong, P. C. M., & Diehl, R. L. (2003). Perceptual normalization for inter- and intra-talker variation in Cantonese level tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 413–421.
Zhang, C. C., Peng, G., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (2012). Unequal effects of speech and non-speech contexts on the perceptual normalization of Cantonese level tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 1088–1099.
Huang, J., & Holt, L. L. (2009). General perceptual contributions to lexical tone normalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3983–3994.
Leather, J. (1983). Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 373–382.
Fox, R., & Qi, Y.-Y. (1990). Context effects in the perception of lexical tone. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 18, 261–283.
Lin, T., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (1984). Shengdiao ganzhi wenti. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2, 59–69.
Moore, C., & Jongman, A. (1997). Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1864–1877.
Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98–104.
Mann, V. A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 407–412.
Lotto, A. J., Kluender, K. R., & Holt, L. L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1134–1140.
Holt, L. L., Lotto, A. J., & Kluender, K. R. (2000). Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 710–722.
Huang, J., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Evidence for central origin of lexical tone normalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 1145–1148.
Peng, G., Zheng, H.-Y., Gong, T., Yang, R.-X., Kong, J.-P., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (2010). The influence of language experience on categorical perception of pitch contours. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 616–624.
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.0). http://www.praat.org/, last accessed 14 Nov 2014.
Zeng, F.-G., Nie, K.-B., Liu, S., Stickney, G., Del Rio, E., Kong, Y.-Y., & Chen, H. (2004). On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1351–1354.
Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B., & Oxenham, A. J. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416, 87–90.
Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peng, G., Zhang, C., Zheng, H.-Y., Minett, J. M., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (2012). The effect of inter-talker variations on acoustic-perceptual mapping in Cantonese and Mandarin tone systems. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 579–595.
Gandour, J. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149–175.
Li, B. & Zhang, C.C. (2010). Effects of F0 dimensions in perception of Mandarin tones. The 7th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing, 29 November – 02 December 2010, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Zhang, C. C., Peng, G., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (2013). Achieving constancy in spoken word identification: time course of talker normalization. Brain and Language, 126, 193–202.
Bronkhorst, A. W. (2000). The cocktail party phenomenon: a review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions. Acta Acustica, 86, 117–128.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC: 61135003 and NSFC: 11474300). We are thankful to all the subjects at SIAT who participated in this experiment. We thank Professor Feng Shi at Nan Kai University for his constructive comments as this work progressed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, F., Peng, G. Context Effect in the Categorical Perception of Mandarin Tones. J Sign Process Syst 82, 253–261 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-015-1008-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-015-1008-2