Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Repeatedly Failing a High School Exit Exam: Voices of English Language Learners

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This qualitative study explored the perceived psychological impact of repeated failures on a high school exit examination (HSEE). We interviewed eight self-identified English language learners (ELLs), whose ages ranged from 20 to 29. All participants were attending tutoring HSEE programs at urban community colleges in New England. Using a modified grounded theory approach (Goldkuhl and Cronholm in Int J Qual Methods 9:187–205, 2010), interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed. The interviewees perceived many more negative effects than benefits of failing a HSEE. They reported adverse effects on academic motivation, emotions, goals, and self-perceptions. Despite these perceived adverse effects, they identified both individual (efforts, goals, self-reflection and positive mindset, positive self-perceptions) and environmental protective factors (encouragement, instructional support and emotional support) that helped them persist in attempting to pass the HSEE. The findings from study have implications for educational and psychological research, policy and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All names are pseudonyms.

References

  • Auld, F, Jr, & White, A. M. (1956). Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 42, 273–281. doi:10.1080/00223980.1956.9713040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Pastorelli, C., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (1999). Self-efficacy pathways to childhood depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 258–269. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, A. S., & Tullis, J. (2010). What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61, 228–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capps, R., Fix, M., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passel, J. S., & Herwantoro, S. (2005). The new demography of America’s schools: Immigration and the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311230_new_demography.pdf.

  • Catterall, J. S. (1989). School dropouts: Here today, here tomorrow. CSE technical report 296. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.

  • Collier, V. P., & Thomas, W. P. (2004). The astounding effectiveness of dual language education for all. NABE Journal of Research and practice, 2(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. G., Krosnick, J. A., & Chang, L. (2006). The case of the Student reactions to being wrongly informed of failing a high-stakes test: Minnesota basic standards test. Educational Policy, 20, 718–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Paula, A., & Campbell, J. D. (2002). Self-esteem and persistence in the face of failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 711–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman, Susan. (2004). Introduction. In S. H. Fuhrman & R. F. Elmore (Eds.), Redesigning accountabilty systems for education (pp. 3–14). New York: Teachers College, Columbia Unversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl, G., & Cronholm, S. (2010). Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: Toward multigrounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9, 187–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P. (2013). Reaching and teaching students in poverty: Strategies for erasing the opportunity gap. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, B., Sturges, K., & Klinger, J. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilig, J. V. (2011). Understanding the interaction between high-stakes graduation tests and English learners. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2633–2669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heubert, J. (2004). High-stakes testing in a changing environment: Disparate impact, opportunity to learn, and current legal protections. In S. Fuhrman & R. Elmore (Eds.), Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education (pp. 220–242). New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Hilsman, R., & Garber, J. (1995). A test of the cognitive diathesis-stress model of depression in children: Academic stressors, attributional style, perceived competences, and control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 370–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme, J. J., Richards, M. P., Jimerson, J. B., & Cohen, R. W. (2010). Assessing the effects of high school exit examinations. Review of Educational Research, 80(4), 476–526. doi:10.3102/0034654310383147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop, A. (2014). The case against exit exams. New America Policy Brief. Retrieved from http://education.newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/ExitExam_FINAL.pdf.

  • Jurges, H., Schneider, K., Senkbeil, M., & Carstensen, C. (2012). Assessment drives learning: The effects of central exit exams on curricular knowledge and mathematical literacy. Economics of Education Review, 31, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, S. E. (2014). When special education trumps ESL: An investigation of service delivery for ELLs with disabilities. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 11(4), 273–306. doi:10.1080/15427587.2014.968070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), 857–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacSwan, J., & Rolstad, K. (2006). How language tests mislead us about children’s abilities: Implications for special education placements. Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2304–2328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2013). Massachusetts comprehensive assessment system. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/overview.html?faq=1.

  • Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2014). Spring 2014 MCAS tests: Summary of state results. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/2014/results/summary.pdf.

  • McIntosh, S. (2012). State high school exit exams: A policy in transition. Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=408.

  • Morales, E. (2010). Linking strengths: Identifying and exploring protective factor clusters in academically resilient low-socioeconomic urban students of color. Roeper Review, 32, 164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., & Borja, A. P. (2015). Promoting psychological well-being globally: Project approach to data collection and analysis. In Bonnie K. Nastasi & Amanda P. Borja (Eds.), Handbook of psychological well-being in children and adolescents: International perspectives and youth voices. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015-144), English Language Learners. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp.

  • National Research Council. (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in public education. Committee on Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Public Education. In M. Hout & S. W. Elliott (Eds.), Board on testing and assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • Nisbett, R., & Masuda, T. (2003).  Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(19), 11163–11170. doi:10.1073/pnas.1934527100.

  • Noble, T., Rosebery, A., Suarez, C., Warren, B., & O’Connor, M. C. (2014). Science assessments and English language learners: Validity evidence based on response processes. Applied Measurement in Education, 27(4), 248–260. doi:10.1080/08957347.2014.944309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, C. E. (2006). More than words? Delving into the substantive meaning(s) of “social justice” in education. Review of Educational Research, 76, 507–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S. O. (2002). Best practices in nondiscriminatory assessment. In Alex Thomas & Jeff Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 1321–1336). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou, D. (2010). To leave or not to leave? A regression discontinuity analysis of the impact of failing the high school exit exam. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papay, J. P., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2010). The consequences of high school exit examinations for low-performing urban students: Evidence from Massachusetts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Jeong-Yeon, L., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., Arshan, N., Atteberry, A., & Kurlaender, M. (2010). Effects of failing a high school exit exam on course taking, achievement, persistence, and graduation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(4), 498–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. L. (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, C. L., Brown, K., & Clark, M. (1987). Personality changes as a function of minimum competency test success or failure. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick, M., & Engel, M. (2001). The Grasshopper and the Ant: Motivational responses of low-achieving students to high-stakes testing. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(3), 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, M. T., Parker, C., Akbayin, B., & McTigue, A. (2010). Processes and challenges in identifying learning disabilities among students who are English language learners in three New York state districts. Institute for Educational Sciences National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 85.

  • Solano-Flores, G., & Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2012). Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice (6th ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (1995). Language minority student achievement and program effectiveness. California Association for Bilingual Education Newsletter, 17(5), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Census Bureau. (2010). Educational attainment by selected characteristics. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0232.pdf.

  • Warren, J. R., Grodsky, E., & Kalogrides, D. (2009). State high school exit examinations and NAEP long-term trends in reading and mathematics, 1971–2004. Educational Policy, 23(4), 589–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. R., Jenkins, K. N., & Kulick, R. B. (2006). High school exit examinations and state-level completion and GED rates, 1975 through 2002. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W., & Choi, D. (2006). The impact of language and high-stakes testing policies on elementary school English language learners in Arizona. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(13), 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis J. Kruger.

Additional information

Thanks are extended to Kristin Holborn, Timothy McIvor, Ashley Cameron, Charles Kim, Kristin Concannon, and Gina Aki for their help with the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kruger, L.J., Li, C., Kimble, E. et al. Impact of Repeatedly Failing a High School Exit Exam: Voices of English Language Learners. Urban Rev 48, 463–483 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0363-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0363-z

Keywords

Navigation