Abstract
Background
Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when members from different groups respond differently to particular items in a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire after controlling for underlying HRQoL construct. This study aimed to assess DIF in the SF-36 questionnaire and its effect on comparing HRQoL scores across patients on HD and healthy people.
Methods
One hundred fifty patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and 642 healthy individuals filled out the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire. Multiple-group multiple-indicator multiple-causes (MG-MIMIC) model was used to assess DIF across patients on HD and healthy population.
Results
Sixteen out of 36 (44.4 %) items were flagged with DIF. Six out of 16 items (37.5 %) were flagged with uniform DIF, nine items (56.2 %) with non-uniform DIF, and one item (6.2 %) with both uniform DIF and non-uniform DIF. DIF items were associated with all subscales with the exception of the limitation due to physical problems and bodily pain subscales. The significant lower HRQoL scores of patients on HD in comparison with healthy people in the physical functioning and vitality subscales did not change after removing the items with uniform DIF.
Conclusions
Our findings revealed that patients on HD and healthy people perceived the meaning of the items in SF-36 questionnaire differently. Although the impact of DIF is minimal, the cross-group comparison across patients on HD and healthy people should be performed with caution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Khakurel S, Agrawal RK, Hada R (2009) Pattern of end stage renal disease in a tertiary care center. J Nepal Med Assoc 48:126–130
Hinkle JL, Cheever KH (2014) The 13th edition of Brunner and Suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
Hinoshita F, Ando R, Sakai R, Kuriyama S (2014) Hemodialysis-associated problems to solve: current and future. Sci World J 2014:382170
Wasserfallen JB, Halabi G, Saudan P (2004) Quality of life on chronic dialysis: comparison between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl 19:1594–1599
Kusleikaite NBI, Kuzminskis V, Vaiciuniene R (2010) The association between health-related quality of life and mortality among hemodialysis patients. Medicina (Kaunas) 46:531–537
Noshad H, Sadreddini S, Nezami N, Salekzamani Y, Ardalan MR (2009) Comparison of outcome and quality of life: haemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients. Singap Med J 50:185–192
Pakpour AH, Saffari M, Yekaninejad MS, Panahi D, Harrison AP, Molsted S (2010) Health-related quality of life in a sample of Iranian patients on hemodialysis. Iran J Kidney Dis 4:50–59
Mittal SK, Ahern L, Flaster E, Maesaka JK, Fishbane S (2001) Self-assessed physical and mental function of haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transpl 16:1387–1394
Hedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Briley LP, Sloane RJ, Pieper CF, Kimmel PL, Szczech LA (2008) Death or hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. Kidney Int 74:930–936
Kimmel PL, Patel SS (2006) Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: focus on end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis. Semin Nephrol 26:68–79
Lopes AA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Goodkin DA, Fukuhara S, Mapes DL, Young EW et al (2007) Factors associated with health-related quality of life among hemodialysis patients in the DOPPS. Qual Life Res 16:545–557
Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F et al (2003) Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS). Kidney Int 64:339–349
Marquis P, Trudeau E (2001) Quality of life and patient satisfaction: two important aspects in asthma therapy. Curr Opin Pulm Med 7:S18–S20
Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, Guo A, Mujais S, Mexican Nephrology Collaborative Study Group (2005) Health-related quality of life predicts outcomes but is not affected by peritoneal clearance: the ADEMEX trial. Kidney Int 67:1093–1104
Mujais SK, Story K, Brouillette J, Takano T, Soroka S, Franek C et al (2009) Health-related quality of life in CKD Patients: correlates and evolution over time. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1293–1301
Tsay SL, Healstead M (2002) Self-care self-efficacy, depression, and quality of life among patients receiving hemodialysis in Taiwan. Int J Nurs Stud 39:245–251
Finkelstein FO, Finkelstein SH (2000) Depression in chronic dialysis patients: assessment and treatment. Nephrol Dial Transpl 15:1911–1913
Rayyani M, Malekyan L, Azzizadeh Forouzi M, Razban F (2014) Self-care self-efficacy and quality of life among patients receiving hemodialysis in South-East of Iran. Asian J Nurs Educ Res 4:165–171
Zimmermann PR, Poli de Figueiredo CE, Fonseca NA (2001) Depression, anxiety and adjustment in renal replacement therapy: a quality of life assessment. Clin Nephrol 56:387–390
Blake C, Codd MB, Cassidy A, O’Meara YM (2000) Physical function, employment and quality of life in end-stage renal disease. J Nephrol 13:142–149
Johansen KL, Shubert T, Doyle J, Soher B, Sakkas GK, Kent-Braun JA (2003) Muscle atrophy in patients receiving hemodialysis: effects on muscle strength, muscle quality, and physical function. Kidney Int 63:291–297
Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, Simmens SJ, Alleyne S, Cruz I, Veis JH (1998) Psychosocial factors, behavioral compliance and survival in urban hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 54:245–254
Painter P, Carlson L, Carey S, Paul SM, Myll J (2000) Physical functioning and health-related quality-of-life changes with exercise training in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 35:482–492
Painter P, Carlson L, Carey S, Paul SM, Myll J (2000) Low-functioning hemodialysis patients improve with exercise training. Am J Kidney Dis 36:600–608
Tawney KW, Tawney PJ, Kovach J (2003) Disablement and rehabilitation in end-stage renal disease. Semin Dial 16:447–452
Chen M, Ku N (1998) Factors associated with quality of life among patients on hemodialysis. Nurs Res 6:393–404
Teresi JA, Fleishman JA (2007) Differential item functioning and health assessment. Qual Life Res 16:33–42
Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 3:4–70
Kim ES, Yoon M (2011) Testing measurement invariance: a comparison of multiple-group categorical CFA and IRT. Struct Equ Model 18:212–223
Curtin RB, Lowrie EG, DeOreo PB (1999) Self-reported functional status: an important predictor of health outcomes among end-stage renal disease patients. Adv Ren Replace Ther 6:133–140
Diaz-Buxo JA, Lowrie EG, Lew NL, Zhang H, Lazarus JM (2000) Quality-of-life evaluation using Short Form 36: comparison in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 35:293–300
Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT (1993) The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 306:1437–1440
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH (2000) Association among SF-36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalisation, and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:2797–2806
McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31:247–263
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483
Pollard B, Johnston M, Dixon D (2013) Exploring differential item functioning in the SF-36 by demographic, clinical, psychological and social factors in an osteoarthritis population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:346
Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, Peterson JJ, Roid G, Hall T, RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement (2010) Differential performance of SF-36 items in healthy adults with and without functional limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:570–575
Dallmeijer AJ, de Groot V, Roorda LD, Schepers VP, Lindeman E, van den Berg LH et al (2007) Cross-diagnostic validity of the SF-36 physical functioning scale in patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a study using Rasch analysis. J Rehabil Med 39:163–169
Taylor WJ, McPherson KM (2007) Using Rasch analysis to compare the psychometric properties of the Short Form 36 physical function score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 57:723–729
Bjorner JB, Kreiner S, Ware JE, Damsgaard MT, Bech P (1998) Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1189–1202
Perkins AJ, Stump TE, Monahan PO, McHorney CA (2006) Assessment of differential item functioning for demographic comparisons in the MOS SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res 15:331–348
Yu YF, Yu AP, Ahn J (2007) Investigating differential item functioning by chronic diseases in the SF-36 health survey: a latent trait analysis using MIMIC models. Med Care 45:851–859
Dehesh T, Zare N, Jafari P, Sagheb MM (2014) Psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the Ferrans and Powers 3.0 index in hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 46:1183–1189
Woods CM (2009) Evaluation of MIMIC-model methods for DIF testing with comparison to two-group analysis. Multivar Behav Res 44:1–27
Jafari H, Lahsaeizadeh S, Jafari P, Karimi M (2008) Quality of life in thalassemia major: reliability and validity of the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire. J Postgrad Med 54:273–275
Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B (2005) The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res 14:875–882
Jones RN (2006) Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination: detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling. Med Care 44:124–133
Traebert J, Foster Page LA, Thomson WM, Locker D (2010) Differential item functioning related to ethnicity in an oral health-related quality of life measure. Int J Paediatr Dent 20:435–441
Traebert J, de Lacerda JT, Thomson WM, Page LF, Locker D (2010) Differential item functioning in a Brazilian–Portuguese version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 38:129–135
Huang IC, Leite WL, Shearer P, Seid M, Revicki DA, Shenkman EA (2011) Differential item functioning in quality of life measure between children with and without special health-care needs. Value Health 14:872–883
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey
Abdelbasit A, Katherine N, PamelaW Kamal HH (2014) Comparing health-related quality of life between haemodialysis patients and a community sample in the United Arab Emirates. Ren Soc Australas J 10:34–43
Sathvik BS, Parthasarathi G, Narahari MG, Gurudev KC (2008) An assessment of the quality of life in hemodialysis patients using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Indian J Nephrol 18:141–149
Cotârlă L (2009) Possibilities of increasing the quality of life of renal patients, chronically dialyzed. Dissertation. Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania
Parker KP, Kutner NG, Bliwise DL, Bailey JL, Rye DB (2003) Nocturnal sleep, daytime sleepiness, and quality of life in stable patients on hemodialysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:68
Crane PK, Hart DL, Gibbons LE, Cook KF (2006) A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning. J Clin Epidemiol 59:478–484
Jafari P, Stevanovic D, Bagheri Z (2015) Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the KINDL questionnaire for quality of life assessment in children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. doi:10.1007/s10578-015-0568-5
Jafari P, Allahyari E, Salarzadeh M, Bagheri Z (2015) Item-level informant discrepancies across obese-overweight children and their parents on the PedsQL™ 4.0 instrument: an iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression. Qual Life Res. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1046-z
Wyse AE (2013) DIF cancellation in the Rasch Model. J Appl Meas 14:118–128
Dimitrov DM (2008) Quantitative research in education. Intermediate and advanced methods. Whittier Publications, New York
Teresi JA (2006) Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications: advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Med Care 44:152–170
Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ (1990) Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. J Educ Meas 27:361–370
Fukuhara S, Lopes AA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Kurokawa K, Mapes DL, Akizawa T (2003) Health-related quality of life among dialysis patients on three continents: the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study. Kidney Int 64:1903–1910
Acaray A, Pinar R (2005) Quality of life in Turkish haemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 37:595–602
Borowiak E, Braksator E, Nowicki M, Kostka T (2009) Quality of life of chronic hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Med Sci Tech 50:RA37–RA42
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dr Nasrin Shokrpour, Mr Hosain Argasi, and Mr Amin Borhani for English editing of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with ethical standards
This work was supported by the Grant Number 89-5299 from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Research Council. This article was extracted from a scientific project conducted by a PhD student, Marjan Faghih. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants prior to enrollment in the study. The study was approved by the ethical committee of our institution, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and it was in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bagheri, Z., Jafari, P., Faghih, M. et al. Testing measurement equivalence of the SF-36 questionnaire across patients on hemodialysis and healthy people. Int Urol Nephrol 47, 2013–2021 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1092-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1092-z