Abstract
Unlike studies on cooperative learning that have focused on the verbal communication aspect of learning, this study focuses on the non-verbal aspect—mindful movement, which is the use of body movement to aid academic learning. Our research examined the link between five learning activities occurring within a cooperative group of children using mindful movement and improvement of their academic achievements in the study of angles in geometry class. The learning activities were: (a) physical contact with the studied environment; (b) using visual and kinesthetic modeling; (c) socio-kinesthetic interaction; (d) sustaining the movement-aided learning activity; (e) non-learning behaviors. 261 learners from eight-second and third grade classes in six different schools participated in the research. The experimental group included 158 learners from five classes. The control group included 103 learners from three classes. It was found that, compared to the conventionally taught control group, the experimental group using mindful movement in cooperative learning reached significantly better results in studying angles. Additionally, a significantly positive correlation was found between each of the five variants of learning activities and improvement in academic achievement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bearson, J. D., Magazman, S., & Filardo, K. E. (1986). Socio-cognitive conflict and cognitive growth in young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32, 51–72.
Ben-Ari, R. (2002). Mindful movement: Toward enhanced intergroup relations in heterogeneous classrooms. Curriculum and Teaching, 17(2), 19–36.
Ben-Ari, R., & Kedem-Friedrich, P. (2000). Restructuring heterogeneous classes for cognitive development: Social interactive perspective. Instructional Science, 28, 153–167.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classrooms. New York: Teaching College Press.
D’Arripe-Longueville, F., Gernigon, C., Huet, M. L., Cadopi, M., & Winnykamen, F. (2002). Peer tutoring in a physical education setting: Influence of tutor skill level on novice learners’ motivation and performance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(1), 105–123.
Darnon, C., Butera, F., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with mastery vs. performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 31(1), 61–70.
Deering, P., & Meloth, M. (1993). A descriptive study of naturally occurring discussion in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 28, 7–11.
Deese, C. W., Ramsey, L. L., Walczyk, J., & Eddy, D. (2000). Using demonstration assessments to improve learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1511–1516.
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4, 193–220.
Forman, A. E., & Cazden, B. C. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. V. Wertch (Ed.), Vygotsky and the formation of social mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hegarty, M., Richardson, E. A., Montello, R. D., Lovelace, K., & Subbiah, I. (2002). Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, 30(5), 425–447.
Humphrey, J. H., & Humphrey, J. N. (1991). Developing elementary school science concepts through active games. Springfield, MA: Charles C. Thomas.
Jeannerod, M. (2004). Visual and action cues contribute to the self-other distinction. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 422–423.
Jirsa, V. K. (2004). Perceptual-cognitive control as a special case in equivalent Multisensory-sensorimotor interactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 385–387.
Johnson, D. W. (2003). Social interdependence: Interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58, 934–945.
Kawano, R. (1998). The effect of exercise on body awareness and mood. Doctorate dissertation, University Microfilms International.
Kutnick, P., & Kington, A. (2005). Children’s friendships and learning in school: Cognitive enhancement through social interaction? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 521–538.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–70). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1994). The development of voluntary attention in the child. In R. Van Der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 289–312). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Littlewood, W. (2003). Cooperative and collaborative learning tasks as pathways towards autonomous interdependence. In P. Benson & S. Too good (Eds.), Learner autonomy: Challenges to theory and practice (pp. 29–40). Dublin: Authentik.
Müller, M. M., Kals, E., & Maes, J. (2008). Fairness, self-interest, and cooperation in a real-life conflict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(3), 684–704.
Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. The Elementary School Journal, 94(3), 285–297.
Radford, L., Demers, S., Guzman, J., & Cerulli, M. (2004). The sensual and the conceptual: Artifact-mediated kinesthetic actions and semiotic activity. In Proceeding of the 28th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 73–80). Bergen, Norway.
Scherer, E. (1987). Muscle sense and innovation feelings: A chapter in the history of perception and action. In H. Herbert & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 171–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shoval, E. (2006). Physical movement and its contribution to academic learning. Israel: Ach. (Hebrew).
Shoval, E., Talmor, R., & Garmize, M. (2006). A curriculum that includes physical activity for dealing with difficult problems in school: An analysis of coherent fundamentals. Curriculum and Teaching, 21, 41–60.
Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In W. M. Reynolds & C. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology 7 (pp. 177–198). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Soo Hoo, S., Takemoto, K. Y., & McCullagh, P. (2004). A comparison of modeling and imagery on the performance of a motor skill. Journal of Sport Behavior, 27, 349–367.
Souvignier, E., & Kronenberger, J. (2007). Cooperative learning in third graders’ jigsaw groups for mathematics and science with and without questioning training. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 755–771.
Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2006). Building effective learning communities; strategies for leadership, learning and collaboration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Taylor, C. (1988). The art and science of lecture demonstration. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Vingarten, G., & Bar-Eli, M. (1993). Sport psychology and physical activity. Israel: Wingate Institute.
Webb, M. N. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 147–172). New York: Plenum Press.
Webb, M. N. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366–389.
Zacks, M. J. (2005). Transformation of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(2), 96–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shoval, E. Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles. Instr Sci 39, 453–466 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9137-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9137-2