Skip to main content
Log in

Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unlike studies on cooperative learning that have focused on the verbal communication aspect of learning, this study focuses on the non-verbal aspect—mindful movement, which is the use of body movement to aid academic learning. Our research examined the link between five learning activities occurring within a cooperative group of children using mindful movement and improvement of their academic achievements in the study of angles in geometry class. The learning activities were: (a) physical contact with the studied environment; (b) using visual and kinesthetic modeling; (c) socio-kinesthetic interaction; (d) sustaining the movement-aided learning activity; (e) non-learning behaviors. 261 learners from eight-second and third grade classes in six different schools participated in the research. The experimental group included 158 learners from five classes. The control group included 103 learners from three classes. It was found that, compared to the conventionally taught control group, the experimental group using mindful movement in cooperative learning reached significantly better results in studying angles. Additionally, a significantly positive correlation was found between each of the five variants of learning activities and improvement in academic achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bearson, J. D., Magazman, S., & Filardo, K. E. (1986). Socio-cognitive conflict and cognitive growth in young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32, 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ari, R. (2002). Mindful movement: Toward enhanced intergroup relations in heterogeneous classrooms. Curriculum and Teaching, 17(2), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ari, R., & Kedem-Friedrich, P. (2000). Restructuring heterogeneous classes for cognitive development: Social interactive perspective. Instructional Science, 28, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classrooms. New York: Teaching College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arripe-Longueville, F., Gernigon, C., Huet, M. L., Cadopi, M., & Winnykamen, F. (2002). Peer tutoring in a physical education setting: Influence of tutor skill level on novice learners’ motivation and performance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(1), 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnon, C., Butera, F., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with mastery vs. performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 31(1), 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deering, P., & Meloth, M. (1993). A descriptive study of naturally occurring discussion in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 28, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, C. W., Ramsey, L. L., Walczyk, J., & Eddy, D. (2000). Using demonstration assessments to improve learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1511–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4, 193–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, A. E., & Cazden, B. C. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. V. Wertch (Ed.), Vygotsky and the formation of social mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., Richardson, E. A., Montello, R. D., Lovelace, K., & Subbiah, I. (2002). Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, 30(5), 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J. H., & Humphrey, J. N. (1991). Developing elementary school science concepts through active games. Springfield, MA: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (2004). Visual and action cues contribute to the self-other distinction. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 422–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jirsa, V. K. (2004). Perceptual-cognitive control as a special case in equivalent Multisensory-sensorimotor interactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 385–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. (2003). Social interdependence: Interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58, 934–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, R. (1998). The effect of exercise on body awareness and mood. Doctorate dissertation, University Microfilms International.

  • Kutnick, P., & Kington, A. (2005). Children’s friendships and learning in school: Cognitive enhancement through social interaction? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 521–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–70). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1994). The development of voluntary attention in the child. In R. Van Der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 289–312). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, W. (2003). Cooperative and collaborative learning tasks as pathways towards autonomous interdependence. In P. Benson & S. Too good (Eds.), Learner autonomy: Challenges to theory and practice (pp. 29–40). Dublin: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. M., Kals, E., & Maes, J. (2008). Fairness, self-interest, and cooperation in a real-life conflict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(3), 684–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. The Elementary School Journal, 94(3), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L., Demers, S., Guzman, J., & Cerulli, M. (2004). The sensual and the conceptual: Artifact-mediated kinesthetic actions and semiotic activity. In Proceeding of the 28th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 73–80). Bergen, Norway.

  • Scherer, E. (1987). Muscle sense and innovation feelings: A chapter in the history of perception and action. In H. Herbert & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 171–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoval, E. (2006). Physical movement and its contribution to academic learning. Israel: Ach. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoval, E., Talmor, R., & Garmize, M. (2006). A curriculum that includes physical activity for dealing with difficult problems in school: An analysis of coherent fundamentals. Curriculum and Teaching, 21, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In W. M. Reynolds & C. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology 7 (pp. 177–198). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soo Hoo, S., Takemoto, K. Y., & McCullagh, P. (2004). A comparison of modeling and imagery on the performance of a motor skill. Journal of Sport Behavior, 27, 349–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souvignier, E., & Kronenberger, J. (2007). Cooperative learning in third graders’ jigsaw groups for mathematics and science with and without questioning training. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 755–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2006). Building effective learning communities; strategies for leadership, learning and collaboration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1988). The art and science of lecture demonstration. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vingarten, G., & Bar-Eli, M. (1993). Sport psychology and physical activity. Israel: Wingate Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M. N. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 147–172). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M. N. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, M. J. (2005). Transformation of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(2), 96–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ella Shoval.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shoval, E. Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles. Instr Sci 39, 453–466 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9137-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9137-2

Keywords

Navigation