Skip to main content
Log in

Children’s first and second-order false-belief reasoning in a verbal and a low-verbal task

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We can understand and act upon the beliefs of other people, even when these conflict with our own beliefs. Children’s development of this ability, known as Theory of Mind, typically happens around age 4. Research using a looking-time paradigm, however, established that toddlers at the age of 15 months old pass a non-verbal false-belief task (Onishi and Baillargeon in Science 308:255–258, 2005). This is well before the age at which children pass any of the verbal false-belief tasks. In this study we present a more complex case of false-belief reasoning with older children. We tested second-order reasoning, probing children’s ability to handle the belief of one person about the belief of another person. We find just the opposite: 7-year-olds pass a verbal false-belief reasoning task, but fail on an equally complex low-verbal task. This finding suggests that language supports explicit reasoning about beliefs, perhaps by facilitating the cognitive system to keep track of beliefs attributed by people to other people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apperly I. A., Butterfill S. A. (2009) Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?. American Psychological Association 116: 953–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Astington J. W. (1993) The child’s discovery of the mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig S., Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Barsalou L. (2008) Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cognitive Science 32: 579–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, L., & Newen A. (2011). The developmental paradox of false belief understanding: A dual-system solution. In J. van Eijck & R. Verbrugge (Eds.), Reasoning about other minds: Logical and cognitive perspectives, CEUR workshop proceedings (pp. 32–49). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-751/

  • De Villiers J. G. (2005) Can language acquisition give children a point of view?. In: Astington J., Baird J. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford Press, Oxford, pp 186–219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn J., Brophy M. (2005) Communication, relationships, and individual differences in children’s understanding of mind. In: Astington J., Baird J. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford Press, Oxford, pp 186–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Flobbe F., Verbrugge R., Hendriks P., Krämer I. (2008) Children’s application of Theory of Mind in reasoning and language. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17(4): 417–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedden T., Zhang J. (2002) What do you think I think you think? Strategic reasoning in matrix games. Cognition 85: 1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebrandse, B., & Roeper, T. Recursion and propositional exclusivity. (submitted)

  • Hollebrandse B., Hobbs K., De Villiers J. G., Roeper T. (2008) Second order embedding and second order false belief. In: Gavarro A., Freitas M. J. (Eds.), Language acquisition and development, proceedings of GALA 2007. Cambridge Scholar Press, Cambridge, pp 270–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijering, B., van Maanen, L., van Rijn, H. & Verbrugge, R. (2010). The facilitative effect of context on second-order social reasoning. In R. Catrambone & R. Ohlsson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1423–1428). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.

  • Milligan K., Astington J. W., Dack L. A. (2007) Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development 78: 622–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onishi K. H., Baillargeon R. (2005) Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?. Science 308: 255–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perner J., Wimmer H. (1985) “John thinks that Mary thinks that . . .” Attribution of second order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39: 437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perner J., Ruffman T. (2005) Infants’ insight into the mind: How deep?. Science 308: 214–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeper T. (2007) The prism of grammar. How child language illuminates humanism. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffman T., Slade L., Crowe E. (2002) The relation between children’s and mothers’ mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Development 73: 734–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan K., Zaitchik D., Tager-Flusberg H. (1994) Preschoolers can attribute second order beliefs. Developmental Psychology 30: 395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman H. M., Bartsch K. (1988) Young children’s reasoning about beliefs. Cognition 30: 239–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer H., Perner J. (1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13: 103–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart Hollebrandse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollebrandse, B., van Hout, A. & Hendriks, P. Children’s first and second-order false-belief reasoning in a verbal and a low-verbal task. Synthese 191, 321–333 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0169-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0169-9

Keywords

Navigation