Abstract
Students evaluate their domain-specific abilities by comparing their own achievement in one domain to that of others (social comparison), to their own previous achievement (temporal comparison), as well as their own achievement in another domain (dimensional comparison). The theories underlying these three comparison processes each assume an upward comparison with a better-off standard to lead to lower self-concept and a downward comparison with a worse-off standard to result in higher self-concept, instead. However, there is a lack of studies investigating the joint effects of simultaneously activated social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons. To close this gap, two experimental studies and one field study were conducted. In Studies 1 (N = 80) and 2 (N = 80), participants were asked to infer the mathematical self-concept of fictitious students after receiving experimentally manipulated social, temporal, and dimensional information about the fictitious students’ achievement in mathematics. In Study 3 (N = 225), participants were asked to report their own mathematical self-concept after rating their mathematical achievement in comparison to social, temporal, and dimensional standards. In all three studies, similar main effects for each of the three comparisons were found leading to lower self-concept following upward comparisons and higher self-concept following downward comparisons. Effect sizes differed, though, indicating social comparisons to have the largest effect, whereas the effects of temporal and dimensional comparisons were small to medium sized. No interaction effects were found. The findings therefore indicate that all three comparison processes are independent and have additive effects on academic self-concept.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Key words used in the query were “self” and either “social comparison”, “temporal comparison”, or “dimensional comparison”. As some of the findings on social and dimensional comparisons stem from research on the internal/external frame of reference model (I/E model; Marsh 1986; Möller et al. 2009), the search term “internal/external frame of reference” was also used to identify studies on social and dimensional comparisons. Duplicates were removed.
Please note that the means presented for each of the “Big Three” are estimated marginal means controlling for the other two comparison processes, respectively.
Please note that the means presented for each of the “Big Three” are estimated marginal means controlling for the other two comparison processes, respectively.
For example, the item “Nobody’s perfect, but I’m just not good at mathematics” was changed to “I’m just not good at mathematics” as the part "Nobody’s perfect” may emphasize the use of social comparisons.
References
Albert, S. (1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84(6), 485–503. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.6.485.
Biernat, M., & Eidelman, S. (2007). Standards. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 308–333). New York: Guilford.
Brookover, W. B., & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching.
Butler, R. (2000). Making judgments about ability: The role of implicit theories of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 965–978. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.965.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Burnett, P. C. (2003). Cracking the self-concept enhancement conundrum: A call and blueprint for the next generation of self-concept enhancement research. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInernery (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 67–90). Greenwich: Information Age.
Dai, D. Y. (2002). Incorporating parent perceptions: A replication and extension study of the internal-external frame of reference model of self-concept development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(6), 617–645. doi:10.1177/074355802237467.
Dickhäuser, O. (2005). Teachers’ inferences about students’ self-concepts—The role of dimensional comparison. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 225–235. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.004.
Dickhäuser, O., & Galfe, E. (2004). Besser als…, schlechter als… Leistungsbezogene Vergleichsprozesse in der Grundschule [Better than…, worse than… Achievement based comparison processes in elementary school]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 36(1), 1–9. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.36.1.1.
Dickhäuser, O., Reuter, M., & Hilling, C. (2005a). Coursework selection: A frame of reference approach using structural equation modelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 673–688. doi:10.1348/000709905X37181.
Dickhäuser, O., Seidler, A., & Kölzer, M. (2005b). Kein Mensch kann alles? Effekte dimensionaler Vergleiche auf das Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept [Nobody is perfect? Effects of dimensional comparisons on task-specific self-concepts]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19(1), 97–106. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.19.12.97.
Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. doi:10.1080/00461520902832368.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. E., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.
Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 89–97. doi:10.1177/0146167285111008.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202.
Fox, C. R., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Correlations, causes and heuristics in surveys of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 27(3), 221–234.
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 9–33. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002.
Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123–142. doi:10.3102/00346543052001123.
Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica. doi:10.1037/11059-000.
Kagen, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (1995). Considering children’s early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary. Washington: National Education Goals Panel.
Köller, O., Daniels, Z., Schnabel, K. U., & Baumert, J. (2000). Kurswahlen von Mädchen und Jungen im Fach Mathematik: Zur Rolle von fachspezifischem Selbstkonzept und Interesse [Course selection of girls and boys in mathematics: The role of academic self-concept and interest]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 14(1), 26–37. doi:10.1024//1010-0652.14.1.26.
Levine, J. M., & Green, S. M. (1984). Acquisition of relative performance information: The roles of intrapersonal and interpersonal comparison. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(3), 385–393. doi:10.1177/0146167284103006.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 129–149. doi:10.2307/1163048.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280.
Marsh, H. W. (2006). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Abdelfattah, F., Nagengast, B., et al. (2015a). The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 168–202. doi:10.3102/0002831214549453.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x.
Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Seaton, M., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Möller, J., et al. (2014). Dimensional comparison theory: An extension of the internal/external frame of reference effect on academic self-concept formation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 326–341. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.003.
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abdelfattah, F., et al. (2015b). Dimensional comparison theory: Paradoxical relations between self-beliefs and achievements in multiple domains. Learning and Instruction, 35, 16–32. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.005.
Marsh, H. W., Möller, J., Parker, P., Xu, M. K., Nagengast, B., & Pekrun, R. (2015c). Internal/external frame of reference model. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 425–432). Oxford: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26084-4.
Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., & Barnes, J. (1984). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relationships with inferred self-concepts and academic achievement. Australian Journal of Psychology, 36(3), 367–386. doi:10.1080/00049538408255318.
Möller, J. (2005). Paradoxical effects of praise and criticism: Social, dimensional and temporal comparisons. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 275–295. doi:10.1348/000709904x24744.
Möller, J., Helm, F., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Nagy, N., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). Dimensional comparisons and their consequences for self-concept, motivation, and emotion. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 430–436). Oxford: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26092-3.
Möller, J., & Husemann, N. (2006). Internal comparisons in everyday life. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 342–353. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.342.
Möller, J., & Köller, O. (1997). Kontexteffekte in Berichtszeugnissen [Context effects in qualitative student records]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 44(3), 187–196.
Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2001). Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 826–835. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.826.
Möller, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120(3), 544–560. doi:10.1037/a0032459.
Möller, J., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Helm, F., Nagy, N., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). The generalized internal/external frame of reference model: An extension to dimensional comparison theory. Frontline Learning Research, 4(2), 1–11. doi:10.14786/flr.v4i2.169.
Möller, J., & Pohlmann, B. (2010). Achievement differences and self-concept differences: Stronger associations for above or below average students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 435–450. doi:10.1348/000709909x485234.
Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A Meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1129–1167. doi:10.3102/0034654309337522.
Möller, J., Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2011). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model: An integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1315–1346. doi:10.3102/0002831211419649.
Möller, J., Zimmermann, F., & Köller, O. (2014). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model using grades and test scores. British Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjep.12047.
Müller-Kalthoff, H., Jansen, M., Schiefer, I., Helm, F., Nagy, N., & Möller, J. (2017). A double-edged sword? On the benefit, detriment, and net effect of dimensional comparison on self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/edu0000171.
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472–489. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472.
Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K., & Epstude, K. (2006). The why, who, and how of social comparison: A social-cognition perspective. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture (pp. 33–54). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nagy, G., Garrett, J., Trautwein, U., Cortina, K. S., Baumert, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Gendered high school course selection as a precursor of gendered careers: The mediating role of self-concept and intrinsic value. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes. Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 115–143). Washington: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11706-004.
Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O., & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 323–345. doi:10.1080/13803610600765687.
Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of students’ academic self-concepts and achievements within and across domains: Replicating and extending the reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1170–1191. doi:10.1037/a0036307.
Pohlmann, B., & Möller, J. (2006). Vergleichseffekte auf kognitive, affektive und motivationale Variablen. Eine experimentelle Überprüfung [Comparison effects on cognitive, affective, and motivational variables: An experimental examination]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38(2), 79–87. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.38.2.79.
Pohlmann, B., & Möller, J. (2009). On the benefit of dimensional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 248–258. doi:10.1037/a0013151.
Pohlmann, B., Möller, J., & Streblow, L. (2004). Zur Fremdeinschätzung von Schülerselbstkonzepten durch Lehrer und Mitschüler [On students’ self-concepts inferred by teachers and classmates]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18, 157–169. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.18.34.157.
Praetorius, A.-K., Greb, K., Lipowsky, F., & Gollwitzer, M. (2010). Lehrkräfte als Diagnostiker—Welche Rolle spielt die Schülerleistung bei der Einschätzung von mathematischen Selbstkonzepten? [Teachers’ diagnostic perception—What role does students’ grade performance play in the teacher’s assessment of mathematical self-concepts?]. Journal of Educational Research Online, 2(1), 121–144.
Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2014). Reading achievement and reading self-concept—Testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21–30. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.004.
Rheinberg, F., & Krug, S. (2005). Motivationsförderung im Schulalltag [Encouraging motivation in school] (3rd ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Ruble, D. N., & Flett, G. L. (1988). Conflicting goals in self-evaluative information seeking: Developmental and ability level analyses. Child Development, 59(1), 97–100. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.ep10514073.
Schurtz, I. M., Pfost, M., & Artelt, C. (2014a). Variieren die Selbstkonzeptdifferenzen in Abhängigkeit vom Leistungsniveau? Differenzielle Zusammenhänge in Deutsch, Englisch und Mathematik [Do self-concept differences vary in dependence of the achievement level? Differential relations in German, English, and mathematics]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 28, 31–42. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000122.
Schurtz, I. M., Pfost, M., Nagengast, B., & Artelt, C. (2014b). Impact of social and dimensional comparisons on student’s mathematical and English subject-interest at the beginning of secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 34, 32–41. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.001.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2002). Internal and external frames of reference for academic self-concept. Educational Psychologist, 37(4), 233–244. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3704_3.
Strickhouser, J. E., & Zell, E. (2015). Self-evaluative effects of dimensional and social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.001.
Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00191.
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 788–806. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.788.
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 928–942. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.928.
Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2001). From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 572–584. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.572.
Wood, J. V., & Wilson, A. E. (2003). How important is social comparison? In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 344–366). New York: Guilford.
Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2009). Self-evaluative effects of temporal and social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 223–227. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.007.
Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2010). Comparisons over time: Temporal trajectories, social comparison, and self-evaluation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 375–382. doi:10.1002/ejsp.737.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller-Kalthoff, H., Helm, F. & Möller, J. The big three of comparative judgment: on the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept. Soc Psychol Educ 20, 849–873 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9395-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9395-9