Skip to main content
Log in

The big three of comparative judgment: on the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students evaluate their domain-specific abilities by comparing their own achievement in one domain to that of others (social comparison), to their own previous achievement (temporal comparison), as well as their own achievement in another domain (dimensional comparison). The theories underlying these three comparison processes each assume an upward comparison with a better-off standard to lead to lower self-concept and a downward comparison with a worse-off standard to result in higher self-concept, instead. However, there is a lack of studies investigating the joint effects of simultaneously activated social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons. To close this gap, two experimental studies and one field study were conducted. In Studies 1 (N = 80) and 2 (N = 80), participants were asked to infer the mathematical self-concept of fictitious students after receiving experimentally manipulated social, temporal, and dimensional information about the fictitious students’ achievement in mathematics. In Study 3 (N = 225), participants were asked to report their own mathematical self-concept after rating their mathematical achievement in comparison to social, temporal, and dimensional standards. In all three studies, similar main effects for each of the three comparisons were found leading to lower self-concept following upward comparisons and higher self-concept following downward comparisons. Effect sizes differed, though, indicating social comparisons to have the largest effect, whereas the effects of temporal and dimensional comparisons were small to medium sized. No interaction effects were found. The findings therefore indicate that all three comparison processes are independent and have additive effects on academic self-concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Key words used in the query were “self” and either “social comparison”, “temporal comparison”, or “dimensional comparison”. As some of the findings on social and dimensional comparisons stem from research on the internal/external frame of reference model (I/E model; Marsh 1986; Möller et al. 2009), the search term “internal/external frame of reference” was also used to identify studies on social and dimensional comparisons. Duplicates were removed.

  2. Please note that the means presented for each of the “Big Three” are estimated marginal means controlling for the other two comparison processes, respectively.

  3. Please note that the means presented for each of the “Big Three” are estimated marginal means controlling for the other two comparison processes, respectively.

  4. For example, the item “Nobody’s perfect, but I’m just not good at mathematics” was changed to “I’m just not good at mathematics” as the part "Nobody’s perfect” may emphasize the use of social comparisons.

References

  • Albert, S. (1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84(6), 485–503. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.6.485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., & Eidelman, S. (2007). Standards. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 308–333). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookover, W. B., & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (2000). Making judgments about ability: The role of implicit theories of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 965–978. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Burnett, P. C. (2003). Cracking the self-concept enhancement conundrum: A call and blueprint for the next generation of self-concept enhancement research. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInernery (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 67–90). Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y. (2002). Incorporating parent perceptions: A replication and extension study of the internal-external frame of reference model of self-concept development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(6), 617–645. doi:10.1177/074355802237467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickhäuser, O. (2005). Teachers’ inferences about students’ self-concepts—The role of dimensional comparison. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 225–235. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickhäuser, O., & Galfe, E. (2004). Besser als…, schlechter als… Leistungsbezogene Vergleichsprozesse in der Grundschule [Better than…, worse than… Achievement based comparison processes in elementary school]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 36(1), 1–9. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.36.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickhäuser, O., Reuter, M., & Hilling, C. (2005a). Coursework selection: A frame of reference approach using structural equation modelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 673–688. doi:10.1348/000709905X37181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickhäuser, O., Seidler, A., & Kölzer, M. (2005b). Kein Mensch kann alles? Effekte dimensionaler Vergleiche auf das Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept [Nobody is perfect? Effects of dimensional comparisons on task-specific self-concepts]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19(1), 97–106. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.19.12.97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. doi:10.1080/00461520902832368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. E., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 89–97. doi:10.1177/0146167285111008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. R., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Correlations, causes and heuristics in surveys of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 27(3), 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 9–33. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123–142. doi:10.3102/00346543052001123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica. doi:10.1037/11059-000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kagen, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (1995). Considering children’s early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary. Washington: National Education Goals Panel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köller, O., Daniels, Z., Schnabel, K. U., & Baumert, J. (2000). Kurswahlen von Mädchen und Jungen im Fach Mathematik: Zur Rolle von fachspezifischem Selbstkonzept und Interesse [Course selection of girls and boys in mathematics: The role of academic self-concept and interest]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 14(1), 26–37. doi:10.1024//1010-0652.14.1.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. M., & Green, S. M. (1984). Acquisition of relative performance information: The roles of intrapersonal and interpersonal comparison. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(3), 385–393. doi:10.1177/0146167284103006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 129–149. doi:10.2307/1163048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (2006). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Abdelfattah, F., Nagengast, B., et al. (2015a). The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 168–202. doi:10.3102/0002831214549453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Seaton, M., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Möller, J., et al. (2014). Dimensional comparison theory: An extension of the internal/external frame of reference effect on academic self-concept formation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 326–341. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abdelfattah, F., et al. (2015b). Dimensional comparison theory: Paradoxical relations between self-beliefs and achievements in multiple domains. Learning and Instruction, 35, 16–32. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Möller, J., Parker, P., Xu, M. K., Nagengast, B., & Pekrun, R. (2015c). Internal/external frame of reference model. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 425–432). Oxford: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26084-4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., & Barnes, J. (1984). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relationships with inferred self-concepts and academic achievement. Australian Journal of Psychology, 36(3), 367–386. doi:10.1080/00049538408255318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J. (2005). Paradoxical effects of praise and criticism: Social, dimensional and temporal comparisons. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 275–295. doi:10.1348/000709904x24744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., Helm, F., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Nagy, N., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). Dimensional comparisons and their consequences for self-concept, motivation, and emotion. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 430–436). Oxford: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26092-3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., & Husemann, N. (2006). Internal comparisons in everyday life. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 342–353. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., & Köller, O. (1997). Kontexteffekte in Berichtszeugnissen [Context effects in qualitative student records]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 44(3), 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2001). Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 826–835. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120(3), 544–560. doi:10.1037/a0032459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Helm, F., Nagy, N., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). The generalized internal/external frame of reference model: An extension to dimensional comparison theory. Frontline Learning Research, 4(2), 1–11. doi:10.14786/flr.v4i2.169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., & Pohlmann, B. (2010). Achievement differences and self-concept differences: Stronger associations for above or below average students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 435–450. doi:10.1348/000709909x485234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A Meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1129–1167. doi:10.3102/0034654309337522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2011). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model: An integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1315–1346. doi:10.3102/0002831211419649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., Zimmermann, F., & Köller, O. (2014). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model using grades and test scores. British Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjep.12047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Kalthoff, H., Jansen, M., Schiefer, I., Helm, F., Nagy, N., & Möller, J. (2017). A double-edged sword? On the benefit, detriment, and net effect of dimensional comparison on self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/edu0000171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472–489. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K., & Epstude, K. (2006). The why, who, and how of social comparison: A social-cognition perspective. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture (pp. 33–54). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, G., Garrett, J., Trautwein, U., Cortina, K. S., Baumert, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Gendered high school course selection as a precursor of gendered careers: The mediating role of self-concept and intrinsic value. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes. Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 115–143). Washington: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11706-004.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O., & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 323–345. doi:10.1080/13803610600765687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of students’ academic self-concepts and achievements within and across domains: Replicating and extending the reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1170–1191. doi:10.1037/a0036307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmann, B., & Möller, J. (2006). Vergleichseffekte auf kognitive, affektive und motivationale Variablen. Eine experimentelle Überprüfung [Comparison effects on cognitive, affective, and motivational variables: An experimental examination]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38(2), 79–87. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.38.2.79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmann, B., & Möller, J. (2009). On the benefit of dimensional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 248–258. doi:10.1037/a0013151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmann, B., Möller, J., & Streblow, L. (2004). Zur Fremdeinschätzung von Schülerselbstkonzepten durch Lehrer und Mitschüler [On students’ self-concepts inferred by teachers and classmates]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18, 157–169. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.18.34.157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praetorius, A.-K., Greb, K., Lipowsky, F., & Gollwitzer, M. (2010). Lehrkräfte als Diagnostiker—Welche Rolle spielt die Schülerleistung bei der Einschätzung von mathematischen Selbstkonzepten? [Teachers’ diagnostic perception—What role does students’ grade performance play in the teacher’s assessment of mathematical self-concepts?]. Journal of Educational Research Online, 2(1), 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2014). Reading achievement and reading self-concept—Testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21–30. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F., & Krug, S. (2005). Motivationsförderung im Schulalltag [Encouraging motivation in school] (3rd ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., & Flett, G. L. (1988). Conflicting goals in self-evaluative information seeking: Developmental and ability level analyses. Child Development, 59(1), 97–100. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.ep10514073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schurtz, I. M., Pfost, M., & Artelt, C. (2014a). Variieren die Selbstkonzeptdifferenzen in Abhängigkeit vom Leistungsniveau? Differenzielle Zusammenhänge in Deutsch, Englisch und Mathematik [Do self-concept differences vary in dependence of the achievement level? Differential relations in German, English, and mathematics]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 28, 31–42. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schurtz, I. M., Pfost, M., Nagengast, B., & Artelt, C. (2014b). Impact of social and dimensional comparisons on student’s mathematical and English subject-interest at the beginning of secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 34, 32–41. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2002). Internal and external frames of reference for academic self-concept. Educational Psychologist, 37(4), 233–244. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3704_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickhouser, J. E., & Zell, E. (2015). Self-evaluative effects of dimensional and social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 788–806. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 928–942. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2001). From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 572–584. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. V., & Wilson, A. E. (2003). How important is social comparison? In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 344–366). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2009). Self-evaluative effects of temporal and social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 223–227. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2010). Comparisons over time: Temporal trajectories, social comparison, and self-evaluation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 375–382. doi:10.1002/ejsp.737.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanno Müller-Kalthoff.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Müller-Kalthoff, H., Helm, F. & Möller, J. The big three of comparative judgment: on the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept. Soc Psychol Educ 20, 849–873 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9395-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9395-9

Keywords

Navigation