Abstract
Research has shown that parents tend to pass educational advantage or disadvantage on to their children. However, little is known about the extent to which the intergenerational transmission of education involves children’s agency. In this study we drew from two traditions in sociological and social psychological theorizing—the theory of cultural and social reproduction and the theory of human agency—to examine whether agency influences children’s educational performance, and if so, whether this influence can be observed among children across social classes. We used data from the Spanish sample of the Program for International Student Assessment (N = 25,003 15-year-olds). Results indicate that the level of child agency was weakly positively related to social class, that child agency impacted on a child’s educational performance, and that the positive effect of agency on educational performance did not vary by social class. This suggests that strategies to enhance disadvantaged children’s agency may prove useful in reducing social gradients in educational performance. More generally, our findings may ignite a debate about the role that social structure and human agency play in shaping social inequality and mobility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Previous studies indicated somewhat stronger associations between parental education and children’s educational performance (e.g., Schlicht et al. 2010; Stadelmann-Steffen 2012). However, this can be explained by the fact that these studies measured parental education on an ordinal scale, using ISCED categories rather than the number of years of completed full-time schooling.
References
Andersen, P. L., & Hansen, M. N. (2012). Class and cultural capital—the case of class inequality in educational performance. European Sociological Review, 28(5), 607–621.
Baker, W., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E. C., & Taggart, B. (2014). Aspirations, education and inequality in England: insights from the effective provision of pre-school, primary and secondary education project. Oxford Review of Education, 40(5), 525–542.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.
Barone, C. (2006). Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning outcomes: A comparative analysis. Sociology, 40(6), 1039–1058.
Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity and social inequality: Changing prospects in Western society. New York: Wiley.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La Reproduction: Éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Paris: Éditions de minuit.
Brambor, T., Clark, R. W., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.
Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 223–243.
Burger, K. (2015). Effective early childhood care and education: Successful approaches and didactic strategies for fostering child development. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(5), 743–760.
Burger, K. (2016). Intergenerational transmission of education in Europe: Do more comprehensive education systems reduce social gradients in student achievement? Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44, 54–67.
Byun, S.-Y., Schofer, E., & Kim, K.-K. (2012). Revisiting the role of cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 219–239.
Byun, S.-Y., Henck, A., & Post, D. (2014). Cross-national variations in student employment and academic performance: The roles of national context and international law. Comparative Education Review, 58(4), 621–652.
Calarco, J. M. (2014). Coached for the classroom: Parent’s cultural transmission and children’s reproduction of educational inequalities. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 1015–1037.
Chin, T., & Phillips, M. (2004). Social reproduction and child-rearing practices: Social class, children’s agency, and the summer activity gap. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 185–210.
Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects of inequality, family and school on mathematical achievement: Country and student differences. Social Forces, 88(4), 1645–1676.
Côté, J. E. (2002). The role of identity capital in the transition to adulthood: The individualization thesis examined. Journal of Youth Studies, 5, 117–134.
Côté, J. E., & Schwartz, S. J. (2002). Comparing psychological and sociological approaches to identity: Identity status, identity capital, and the individualization process. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 571–586.
Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304.
Dubow, E. F., Boxer, P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parent’s education on children’s educational and occupational success. Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55(3), 224–249.
Eccles, J. S. (2008). Agency and structure in human development. Research in Human Development, 5(4), 231–243.
Elder, G. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.
Eneau, J. (2012). Educational reciprocity and developing autonomy: The social dimension of becoming oneself. In K. Schneider (Ed.), Becoming oneself. Dimensions of ‘Bildung’ and the facilitation of personality development (pp. 29–54). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Eurydice. (2012). Key data on education in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Evans, K. (2007). Concepts of bounded agency in education, work, and the personal lives of young adults. International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 85–93.
Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 291–316.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.
Gofen, A. (2009). Family capital: How first-generation higher education students break the intergenerational cycle. Family Relations, 58(1), 104–120.
Grusky, D. B. (2001). Social stratification. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 14443–14452). New York: Elsevier.
Hertz, T., Jayasundera, T., Piraino, P., Selcuk, S., Smith, N., & Verashchagina, A. (2007). The inheritance of educational inequality: International comparisons and fifty-year trends. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7(2), 1–46.
Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2006). Agency: An empirical model of an abstract concept. Advances in Life Course Research, 11, 33–67.
Jaeger, M. M., & Holm, A. (2007). Does parent’s economic, cultural, and social capital explain the social class effect on educational attainment in the Scandinavian mobility regime? Social Science Research, 36(2), 719–744.
Jerrim, J., Vignoles, A., Lingam, R., & Friend, A. (2015). The socio-economic gradient in children’s reading skills and the role of genetics. British Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 6–29.
Khattab, N. (2003). Explaining educational aspirations of minority students: the role of social capital and student’s perceptions. Social Psychology of Education, 6, 283–302.
Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747–776.
Le Donné, N. (2014). European variations in socioeconomic inequalities in student’s cognitive achievement: The role of educational policies. European Sociological Review, 30(3), 329–343.
Lee, V. E., Zuze, T. L., & Ross, K. N. (2005). School effectiveness in 14 sub-Saharan African countries: Links with 6th grader’s reading achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2–3), 207–246.
Linver, M. R., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Kohen, D. E. (2002). Family processes as pathways from income to young children’s development. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 719–734.
Little, T. D., Oettingen, G., Stetsenko, A., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). Children’s action-control beliefs about school performance: How do American children compare with German and Russian children? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 686–700.
Lui, C. K., Chung, P. J., Wallace, S. P., & Aneshensel, C. S. (2014). Social status attainment during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1134–1150.
Marteleto, L., & Andrade, F. (2014). The educational achievement of Brazilian adolescents: Cultural capital and the interaction between families and schools. Sociology of Education, 87(1), 16–35.
Mills, C. (2008). Reproduction and transformation of inequalities in schooling: The transformative potential of the theoretical constructs of Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 79–89.
Nordlander, E., Strandh, M., & Brännlund, A. (2015). What does class origin and education mean for the capabilities of agency and voice? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2), 291–312.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity, Giving every student the chance to succeed. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Opdenakker, M.-C., & van Damme, J. (2001). Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 407–432.
Ou, S.-R., & Reynolds, A. J. (2008). Predictors of educational attainment in the Chicago longitudinal study. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 199–229.
Parker, P. D., Schoon, I., Tsai, Y.-M., Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Achievement, agency, gender, and socioeconomic background as predictors of postschool choices: A multicontext study. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1629–1642.
Perry, L. B., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1137–1162.
Prout, A., & James, A. (1990). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 7–34). London: Falmer Press.
Pugh, A. J. (2009). Longing and belonging: Parents, children, and consumer culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rice, L., Barth, J. M., Guadagno, R. E., Smith, G. P. A., & McCallum, D. M. (2013). The role of social support in student’s perceived abilities and attitudes toward math and science. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1028–1040.
Roksa, J., & Potter, D. (2011). Parenting and academic achievement: Intergenerational transmission of educational advantage. Sociology of Education, 84(4), 299–321.
Rudd, P., & Evans, K. (1998). Structure and agency in youth transitions: Student experiences of vocational further education. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 39–62.
Savage, M., & Egerton, M. (1997). Social mobility, individual ability and the inheritance of class inequality. Sociology, 31(4), 645–672.
Schlicht, R., Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Freitag, M. (2010). Educational inequality in the EU. European Union Politics, 11(1), 29–59.
Schwartz, S. J., Côté, J. E., & Arnett, J. J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: Two developmental routes in the individualization process. Youth and Society, 37(2), 201–229.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Los Angeles: Sage.
Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2012). Education policy and educational inequality—evidence from the Swiss laboratory. European Sociological Review, 28(3), 379–393.
Stewart, E. B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement: The influence of school- and individual-level factors on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 40(2), 179–204.
Stoecklin, D. (2013). Theories of action in the field of child participation: In search of explicit frameworks. Childhood, 20(4), 443–457.
UN General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. UN, OHCHR.
Van Doorn, M., Pop, I., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of education across European countries and cohorts. European Societies, 13(1), 93–117.
Wu, M. (2005). The role of plausible values in large-scale assessments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 114–128.
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burger, K., Walk, M. Can children break the cycle of disadvantage? Structure and agency in the transmission of education across generations. Soc Psychol Educ 19, 695–713 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9361-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9361-y