Abstract
One of the methods used most often to assess students’ friendships and friendship networks is the reciprocal nomination method. However, an often heard complaint is that this technique produces rather negative outcomes. This study compares the reciprocal nomination method with another method to assess students’ friendships and friendship networks: Social Cognitive Mapping (SCM). The outcomes show that descriptions of students’ friendships and friendship networks by both methods tend largely to overlap, even though SCM divides the students into smaller groups. The nomination method indeed yields a slightly more negative picture, labeling more students as “isolates”. According to students, in most cases the group structure of SCM best reflects reality, whereas more than half of the teachers consider the nomination structure to best fit with reality. It is concluded that the differences between both methods are small, which seems to be primarily based on rather arbitrary decisions in the programs calculating students’ scores and group composition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. (1999) UCINET for windows. Analytic Technologies, Natick
Buysse V., Davis Goldman B., Skinner M. L. (2002) Setting effects on friendship formation among young children with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children 68: 503–517
Chambers S. M., Kay R. W. (1992) Research on social integration: What are the problems?. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 39: 47–59
Cullinan D., Sabornie E. J., Crossland C. L. (1992) Social mainstreaming of mildly handicapped students. The Elementary School Journal 92: 339–351
Davis S., Howell P., Cooke F. (2002) Sociodynamic relationships between children who stutter and their non-stuttering classmates. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 43: 939–947
De Monchy M., Pijl S. J., Zandberg T. J. (2004) Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of students with behaviour problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education 19: 317–330
Doll B. (1996) Children without friends: Implications for practice and policy. School Psychology Review 25: 165–183
Farmer T. W., Estell D. B., Leung M., Trott H., Bishop J., Cairns B. D. (2003) Individual characteristics, early adolescent peer affiliations, and school dropout: An examination of aggressive and popular group types. Journal of School Psychology 41: 217–232
Farmer T. W., Farmer E. M. Z. (1996) Social relationships of students with exceptionalities in mainstream classrooms: Social networks and homophily. Exceptional Children 62: 431–450
Frostad P., Pijl S. J. (2007) Does being friendly help in making friends? The relation between the social position and social skills of students with special needs in mainstream education. European Journal of Special Needs Education 22: 15–30
Gest S. D. (2006) Teacher reports of children’s friendships and social groups: Agreement with peer reports and implications for studying similarity. Social Development 15: 248–259
Gest S. D., Farmer T. W., Cairns B. D., Xie H. (2003) Identifying children’s peer social networks in school classrooms: Links between peer reports and observed interactions. Social Development 12: 513–529
Gower J. C. (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857–871
Guralnick M. J., Neville B., Hammond M. A., Connor R. T. (2007) The friendships of young children with developmental delays. A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 28: 64–79
Hunt P., Alwell M., Farron-Davis F., Goetz L. (1996) Creating socially supportive environments for fully included students who experience multiple disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 21: 53–71
Hymel S., Vaillancourt T., McDougal P., Renshaw P. D. (2002) Peer acceptance and rejection in childhood. In: Smith P. K., Hart C. H. (eds) Blackwell handbook of childhood social development. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Oxford, Carlton, pp 265–284
Jiang X. L., Cillessen A. H. N. (2005) Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review 25: 1–25
Juvonen J., Bear G. (1992) Social adjustment of children with and without learning disabilities in integrated classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 322–330
Kindermann T. A. (1993) Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children’s motivation in school. Developmental Psychology 29: 970–977
Koster M., Pijl S. J., Nakken H., van Houten E. (2010) Social participation of students with special needs in regular primary education: The state of affairs in the Netherlands. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 57(1): 59–75
Ladd G. W. (1990) Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children’s early school adjustment?. Child Development 61: 1081–1100
Larrivee B., Horne M. D. (1991) Social status: A comparison of mainstreamed students with peers of different ability levels. The Journal of Special Education 25: 90–101
Leung, M. (1998). A user manual for SCM 4.0. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Center for Developmental Science.
Leung B. P., Silberling J. (2006) Using sociograms to identify social status in the classroom. The California School Psychologist 11: 57–61
Male D. B. (2007) The friendships and peer relationships of children and young people who experience difficulties in learning. In: Florian L. (Ed.) The SAGE handbook of special education. SAGE Publications, London, pp 460–474
Newcomb A. F., Bagwell C. L. (1996) The developmental significance of children’s friendship relations. In: Bukowski W. M., Newcomb A. F., Hartup W. W. (eds) The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289–321
Pearl R., Farmer T. W., Van Acker R., Rodkin P. C., Bost K. K., Coe M., Henley W. (1998) The social integration of students with mild disabilities in general education classrooms: Peer group membership and peer-assessed social behaviour. The Elementary School Journal 99: 167–185
Pijl S. J., Frostad P., Flem A. (2008) The social position of pupils with special needs in regular schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52(5): 387–405
Richards W. D. (1995) Negopy 4.30. manual and user’s guide. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby
Smith, D. (2004). Practical classroom strategies that work: Using sociograms as a behavioural management tool. http://www.aase.edu.au/2004_Conf_papers/Practical%20classroom%20strategies%20that%20work%20-%20D.pdf (accessed 21-4-2010)
Williams G. A., Asher S. R. (1992) Assessment of loneliness at school among children with mild mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation 96: 373–385
Xie H., Cairns R. B., Cairns B. D. (1999) Social networks and configurations in inner-city schools: Aggression, popularity, and implications for students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 7: 147–155
Yugar J. M., Shapiro E. S. (2001) Elementary children’s school friendships: A comparison of peer assessment methodologies. School Psychology Review 30: 568–585
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Pijl, S.J., Koster, M., Hannink, A. et al. Friends in the classroom: a comparison between two methods for the assessment of students’ friendship networks. Soc Psychol Educ 14, 475–488 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9162-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9162-2