Abstract
Once a working relationship is damaged through an act of injustice, how do the victim and offender repair their relationship? What causes the victim to let go of the anger and resentment and then reconcile with the offender? We propose a theory that the likelihood of forgiveness and reconciliation is greatly enhanced, and revenge and avoidance greatly decreased, if justice is first served. That is, forgiveness follows justice; without justice, forgiveness is much less likely. Justice may be served one of three ways: (1) by the victim evening the score; (2) by the organization punishing the offender; or (3) by the offender repenting. We recommend that managers establish a procedurally just climate so that victims of offense seek distributive justice through formal channels rather than seeking it themselves through revenge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Thus, a high motivation for revenge does not always lead to revenge, which is why we separate ‘motivation for revenge’ from ‘revenge’ in our model.
References
How employees respond to personal offense: the effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace J. Appl. Psychol 86: 52–59
Aquino K., Tripp T. M., and Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol., 91, 653–658.
Averill J. R. (1982). Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag
Baron R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 73: 199–207
Baumeister R. F., Exline J. J., Sommer K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington Jr (Ed.) Dimensions of Forgiveness. (pp. 79–104). Templeton Foundation Press, Philadelphia
Baumeister R. F., Smart L., Boden J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of self-esteem. Psychol. Rev. 103: 5–33
Bies R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings, B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289–319). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT
Bies R. J. (1993). Privacy and procedural justice in organizations. Soc. Justice Res. 6: 69–86
Bies R. J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (eds.), Advances in Organizational Behavior (pp. 89–118). The New Lexington Press, San Francisco
Bies R. J., Tripp T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer, T. Tyler (eds.), Trust and Organizations (pp. 246–260). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Bies R. J., Tripp T. M. (2002). Hot flashes, open wounds: Injustice and the tyranny of its emotions. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, D Skarlicki (eds.), Emerging Perspectives on Managing Organizational Justice (pp. 203–223). Information Age, Greenwich, CT
Bies R. J., Tripp T. M. (2005). The study of revenge in the workplace: Conceptual, ideological, empirical issues. In S. Fox, P. Spector (eds.), Counterproductive Workplace Behavior: An Integration of Both Actor and Recipient Perspectives on Causes and Consequences (pp. 65–82). American Psychological Association, Washintong, DC
Bies R. J., Tripp T. M., Kramer R. M. (1997). At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone, J. Greenberg (eds.), Anti Social Behavior in Organizations (pp. 18–36). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Bies R. J., Tyler T. R. (1993). The litigation mentality in organizations: A test of alternative psychological explanations. Organ. Sci. 4: 352–366
Bies, R. J., and Tripp, T. M. (1995). The use and abuse of power: Justice as social control. In Cropanzano, R. and Kacmar, M. (eds.), Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing Social Climate at Work, Quorum Press, pp. 131–146
Bradfield M. O., Aquino K. (1999). The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on revenge and forgiveness in the workplace. J. Manage. 25: 607–631
Brockner J. (1988). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research, theory, and practice. In L. L. Cummings, B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT
Buss A. H. (1962). The Psychology of Aggression. John Wiley, New York
Corrado R. R., Cohen I. M., Glackman W., Odgers C. (2003). Serious and violent young offenders decisions to recidivate: An assessment of five sentencing models. Crime Delinq. 49: 179–200
Darley J. M., Pittman T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 7: 324–336
Douglas S. C., Martinko M. J. (2001). Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression. J. Appl. Psychol. 86: 547–559
Elangovan A. R., Shapiro D. L. (1998). Betrayal of trust in organizations. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23: 547–566
Enright, R. D., & The Human Development Study Group. (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In Kurtines W., Gewritz J. (eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, Vol. 1, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 123–152
Exline J. J., Worthington E. L. Jr., Hill P., McCullough M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 7: 337–348
Felstiner W. L. F., Abel R. F., Sarat A. (1980–81). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law Soc. Rev. 15: 631–654
Galaway B., Judson J. (1996) Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey NY
Geen R. G. (1990). Human Aggression. Brooks-Cole, Pacific Grove, CA
Glomb T. M. (2002). Workplace anger and aggression: Informing conceptual models with data from specific encounters. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 7: 20–36
Greenberg J. (1990a). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden costs of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psychol. 75: 561–568
Greenberg J. (1990b). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 111–157). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT
Hogan R., Emler N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J Lerner, S. C. Lerner (eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior (pp. 125–143). Plenum, New York
Jones E. E., Kanouse D. E., Kelley H. H., Nisbett R.E., Valines S., Weiner B. (1972). Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ
Jones E. E., Nisbett R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, B. Weiner (eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (pp. 79–94). General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ
Kelman H. C., Hamilton V. L. (1989). Crimes of Obedience. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Kim P. H., Dirks K. T., Cooper C. D., Ferrin D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organ. Behav. Human Decis. Process. 99: 49–65
Kim P. H., Ferrin D. L, Cooper C. D., Dirks K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology vs. denial for repairing ability- vs. integrity-based trust violations. J. Appl. Psychol. 89: 104–118
Kim S. H., Smith R. H., Brigham N. L. (1998). Effects of power imbalance and the presence of third parties on reactions to harm: Upward and downward revenge. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24: 353–361
Kramer R. M. (1994). The sinister attribution error. Motiv. Emotion 18: 199–231
Leventhal G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, R. Willis (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 27–55). Plenum Press, New York
Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Bies R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23: 438–458
Matthews C. (1988). Hardball: How Politics is Played – Told by One Who Knows the Game. Summit Books, New York
McCullough M. E., Rachal K. C., Sandage S. J., Worthington E. L., Brown S. W, Hight T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75: 1586–1603
McCullough M. E., Worthington E. L., Rachal K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 321–336
Miller D., Vidmar N. (1981). The social psychology of punishment reactions. In S. Lerner, M. Lerner (eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior (pp. 145–167). Plenum Press, New York
Mishra A. K., Spreitzer G. M. (1998). Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23: 567–588
Morrill C. (1992). Vengeance among executives. Va. Rev. Sociol. 1: 51–76
Morrill, C. (1995). The executive way: Conflict management incorporations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Neuman J. H., Baron R. A. (1997). Aggression in the workplace. In R. A. Giacalone, J. Greenberg (eds.), Antisocial Behavior in Organizations (pp. 37–67). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Robinson S. L., Bennett R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Acad. Manage. J. 38: 555–572
Rozin P. Lower L., Imada S., Haidt J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76: 574–586
Skarlicki D. P., Folger R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 82: 434–443
Skarlicki D. P., Folger R., Tesluk P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Acad. Manage. J. 42: 100–108
Snyder M., Cantor N. (1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 635–679). McGraw-Hill, New York
Sprecher S. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relations. Soc. Psychol. Q. 49: 309–321
Taylor S. E., Fiske S. T. (1978). Social Cognition. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA
Tomlinson E. C., Dineen B. R., Lewicki R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. J. Manage. 30: 165–187
Tripp T. M, Bies R. J. (1997). What’s good about revenge? In R. J. Lewicki, R. J. Bies, B. H. Sheppard (eds.), Research on negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 6, pp. 145–160). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT
Tripp T. M., Bies R. J., Aquino K. (2002). Poetic justice or petty jealousy? The aesthetics of revenge. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 89: 966–984
Tyler T. R. (1993). Why People Obey the Law. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Wicklund R. A., Gollwitzer P. M. (1982). Symbolic Self-Completion. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Witvliet, C. V. O., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade, N. G., and Berry, J. W. (2002). Physiological reactivity to apology and restitution. Paper presented at a meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Washington, D.C.
Woodstock Theological Center. (1998). Forgiveness and Conflict Resolution: Reality and Utility. Woodstock Center, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tripp, T.M., Bies, R.J. & Aquino, K. A Vigilante Model of Justice: Revenge, Reconciliation, Forgiveness, and Avoidance. Soc Just Res 20, 10–34 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0030-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0030-3