Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Do People Do to Achieve Work–Life Balance? A Formative Conceptualization to Help Develop a Metric for Large-Scale Quality-of-Life Surveys

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal in this paper is to build a theoretical foundation for a new formative measure of work–life balance. The current indicators of work–life balance used in large-scale social surveys are outcome-based measures. We critique the use of outcome-based measures of work–life balance and argue that a more suitable measure should reflect personal strategies people use to foster work–life balance. As such, we propose a formative conceptualization of work–life balance composed of a set of inter-life domain strategies theorized to increase overall life satisfaction. Specifically, work–life balance is conceptualized as a higher-order construct composed of four behavior-based life domain strategies and four cognition-based life domain strategies. The behavior-based strategies are (1) role engagement in multiple domains, (2) role enrichment, (3) domain compensation, and (4) role conflict management. The cognition-based strategies are: (1) positive spillover, (2) segmentation, (3) value compensation, and (4) whole-life perspective. The effects of these behavior- and cognition-based strategies on overall life satisfaction are explained through a set of theoretical principles. Research and policy implications are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Annink, A., den Dulk, L., & Steijn, B. (2016). Work–family conflict among employees and the self-employed across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 126, 571–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating bottom–up and top–down theories of subjective well-being: the case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 646–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T., & DeMuth, R. L. F. (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, C. A., & Fisher, G. G. (2012). Ethical imperatives of work/life balance. In N. P. Reilly, M. J. Sirgy, & C. A. Gorman (Eds.), Work and quality of life (pp. 181–202). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, C. A., Matthews, R. A., & Hoffman, M. E. (2007). Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (1988). Some antecedents and consequences of work–family conflict. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 3, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, W. J., Eby, L. T., Bordeaux, C., Lockwood, A., & Lambert, D. (2007). A review of research methods in IO/OB work family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champoux, J. E. (1978). Perceptions of work and nonwork: A reexamination of the compensatory and spillover models. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 5, 402–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. H., Ye, Y.-C., Chen, M.-Y., & Tung, I.-W. (2010). Alegria! Flow in leisure and life Satisfaction: The mediating role of event satisfaction using data from acrobatics show. Social Indicators Research, 99, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1237–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25, 357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 11–58). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of research. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Direnzo, M. S., Greenhaus, J. H., & Weer, C. H. (2015). Relationship between protean career orientation and work–life balance: A resource perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 538–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eby, L. T., Maher, C. P., & Butts, M. M. (2010). The intersection of work and family life: The role of affect. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 599–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Oster, C. (2010). Managing a work–life balance: the experiences of midwives working in a group practice setting. Midwifery, 26, 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: a meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 642–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S. D., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2000). Allies or Enemies? How choices about work and family affect the quality of men’s and women’s lives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R. (2003). Work–family balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 143–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work–family conflict: Testing a model of the work–family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D., & Russell, H. (2009). Work-family conflict and working conditions in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93(3), 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, M., Coenders, G., Saez, M., & Casas, F. (2010). Non-linearity, complexity and limited measurement in the relationship between satisfaction with specific life domains and satisfaction with life as a whole. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 335–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–183). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Carlson, D. S. (2007). Conceptualizing work–family balance: Implications for practice and research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagqvist, E., Gådin, K. G., & Nordenmark, M. (2017). Work-family conflict and Well-being across Europe: The Role of gender context. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 785–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G. C., & Hammer, L. B. (2006). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work–family positive spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. (1964). Current trends and issues in adaptation-level theory. American Psychologist, 19, 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilies, R., Wilson, K. S., & Wagner, D. T. (2009). The spillover of daily job satisfaction onto employees’ family lives: The facilitating role of work–family integration. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F., Burke, R. J., & Westman, M. (2013). Work-life balance: A psychological perspective. Psychology Press.

  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalliath, T., & Brough, P. (2008). Work–life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. Journal of Management and Organization, 14, 323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaseauru, K. (2009). The effect of union type on work–life conflict in five European countries. Social Indicators Research, 93, 549–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmeyer, C. (2000). Work–life initiatives: Greed or benevolence regarding workers’ time? Trends in Organizational Behavior, 7, 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Valcour, M., & Lirio, P. (2014). The sustainable workforce: Organizational strategies for promoting work–life balance and well-being. In C. Cooper & P. Chen (Eds.), Work and wellbeing (pp. 295–318). Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work–home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 704–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. J. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations, 43, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurijseen, I., & Glorieux, I. (2013). Balancing work and family: A panel analysis of the impact of part-time work on the experience of time pressure. Social Indicators Research, 112, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, M. P., & Durup, M. J. (1996). Work, home, and in-between: A longitudinal study of spillover. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H. B., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B. R., Gloster, C. S., et al. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students at historically black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time, and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. R., & MacDermid, S. M. (1996). Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 77(1), 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnity, F., & Calvert, E. (2009). Work–life conflict and social inequality in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93, 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnity, F., & Whelan, C. T. (2009). Comparing work–life conflict in Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research, 93, 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNall, L. A., Nicklin, J. M., & Masuda, A. D. (2010). A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work–family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 381–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1996). Home and work. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson-Buchanan, J., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Fritz, C., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Relationships between work–home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: the role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, F. (2009). Determinants of work–life balance: Shortcomings in the contemporary measurement of WLB in large-scale surveys. Social Indicators Research, 92, 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2012). When family considerations influence work decisions: Decision-making processes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 322–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppanner, L. (2013). Conflict between work and family: An investigation of four policy measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, S. D. (1974). Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39, 567–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. (2002). The psychology of quality of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life: Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and eudaimonia. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., & Lee, D. J. (2016). Work-life balance: A quality-of-life model. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(4), 1059–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., Reilly, N., Wu, J., & Efraty, D. (2008). A work–life identity model of well-being: Towards a research agenda linking quality-of-work–life (QWL) programs with quality of life (QOL). Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., & Wu, J. (2009). The pleasant life, the engaged life, and the meaningful life: What about the balanced life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time the benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E. J., Binnewies, C., & Scholl, A. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect. Work & Stress, 22, 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staines, G. L. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and non-work. Human Relations, 33, 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiber, N. (2009). Reported levels of time-based and strain-based conflict between work and family roles in Europe: A multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research, 93, 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, M., Padgett, M. Y., & Baldwin, T. T. (1989). Job and life satisfaction: A reevaluation of the strength of the relationship and gender effects as a function of the date of the study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 502–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work–family fit and balance: A demands and resources approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 822–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2000). Basic problems in positive mood regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2014). Driving it home: How workplace emotional labor harms employee home life. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, J. H., Butts, M. M., Casper, W. J., & Allen, T. D. (2016). A conceptual and empirical integration of multiple meanings of work–family balance. Personnel Psychology. doi:10.1111/peps.12132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-H. (2008). Can we weight satisfaction score with importance ranks across life domains? Social Indicators Research, 86, 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-H. (2009). Enhancing quality of life by shifting importance perception among life domains. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-H., Tsai, Y.-M., & Chen, L. H. (2009). How do positive views maintain life satisfaction? Social Indicators Research, 91, 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasbek, P. (2004). The business case for firm-level work–life-balance policies: A review of the literature. Labor Market Policy Group. Wellington: Department of Labour. http://www.dol.govt.nz/PDFs/FirmLevelWLB.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

    Dong-Jin Lee

  2. Pamplin College of Business, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    M. Joseph Sirgy

Authors
  1. Dong-Jin Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Joseph Sirgy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Jin Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, DJ., Sirgy, M.J. What Do People Do to Achieve Work–Life Balance? A Formative Conceptualization to Help Develop a Metric for Large-Scale Quality-of-Life Surveys. Soc Indic Res 138, 771–791 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1673-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1673-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation