Abstract
We examined the structure, reliability, construct validity, and gender invariance of the Italian version of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (Italian MHC–SF), a self-report questionnaire for positive mental health assessment developed by Keyes. The scale was administered to 1,438 Italian respondents, mainly from central and southern Italy, between the ages of 18 and 89 years (m = 47.12; SD = 19.56). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factors solution (emotional, psychological, and social) and a latent factor consisting of the three dimensions of well-being, and that the structure of the scale was the same for males and females. Results revealed a high internal reliability and moderate test–retest reliability. The subscales correlated positively with corresponding aspects of well-being and functioning, showing convergent validity. The scale correlated negatively and moderately with measures of mental illness, showing divergent validity. Exploratory factor analysis supported the hypothesis of two separate, but correlated, factors for mental health and mental illness, showing discriminant validity and support for the two-continua model. A categorical diagnosis of the presence of mental health and the absence of mental health was applied to the sample. The Italian MHC–SF is a reliable and valid instrument to measure well-being and the positive aspects of mental health.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbaranelli, C. (2007). Analisi dei dati. Tecniche multivariate per la ricerca psicologica e sociale. Milano: Led Edizioni.
Berger-Schmitt, R., & Noll, H. H. (2000). Conceptual framework and structure of a European system of social indicators. EuReporting Working Paper No. 9, Centre for Survey Research and methodology (ZUMA). Mannheim: Mannheim University, Social Indicators Department.
Blasi, E., Nucera, M., Cicatiello, C., & Franco, S. (2012). Socio-demographic components of eudaimonic well-being: A survey in an Italian province. Social Indicators Research,. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0104-y.
Byrne, B. M., Oakland, T., Leong, F. T. L., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Hambleton, R. K., & Cheung, F. M. (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(2), 94–105.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.
Capone, V., & Petrillo, G. (2013). Health promotion in international documents: Strengths and weaknesses from the perspective of community empowerment. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 98–114.
Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2008). Le proprietà psicometriche della versione italiana della. Need for Cognition Scale-Short Form. In National Congress Italian Psichology Association—Sezione di Psicologia Sperimentale, Padova, 18–20 September, pp. 1–1.
Cicognani, E., & Pirini, C. (2007). Partecipazione sociale, senso di comunità e benessere: Una ricerca con studenti universitari. Psicologia della Salute, 1, 103–115.
D’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo’s stanford time perspective inventory (ZPTI): Short form. Time & Society, 12(2–3), 333–347.
Davidson, W. B., & Cotter, P. R. (1986). Measurement of sense of community within the sphere of city. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 608–619.
De Vellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207.
Di Fabio, A., & Busoni, L. (2009). Proprietà psicometriche della versione italiana della Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) con studenti universitari. Counseling. Giornale Italiano di Ricerca e Applicazioni, 2, 201–212.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psycologist, 55(1), 34–43.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). Satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Diener, R., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 189–216.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.
Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 844–854.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(2), 249–251.
Goldberg, D. P. (1992). General health questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Gonzales, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1985). Time in perspective. Psychology Today, 19(3), 21–26.
Hooghe, M., & Vanhoutte, B. (2011). Subjective well-being and social capital in Belgian communities. The impact of community characteristics on subjective well-being indicators in Belgium. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 17–36.
Joshanloo, M., Wissing, M. P., Itumeleng, P. K., & Lamers, S. M. A. (2013). Measurement invariance of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) across three cultural groups. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 755–759.
Kagan, S. (1992). The limits of well-being. In E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller Jr, & J. Paul (Eds.), The good life and the human good (pp. 169–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell-Sage.
Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Behavior Research, 43, 207–222.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Subjective well-being in mental health and human development research worldwide: An Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 77(1), 1–10.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95–108.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2009a). The nature and importance of positive mental health in America’s adolescents. In R. Gilman, E. Huebner, & M. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 9–23). New York: Routledge.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2009b). Atlanta: Brief description of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF). Resource document. Emory University web site. Accessed Jan 25, 2012 from www.sociology.emory.edu/ckeyes.
Keyes, C. L. M., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: Distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 197–201.
Keyes, C. L. M., Eisenberg, D., Perry, G. S., Dube, S. R., Kroenke, K., & Dhingra, S. S. (2012). The relationship of level of positive mental health with current mental disorders in predicting suicidal behavior and academic impairment in college students. Journal of American College Health, 60(2), 126–133.
Keyes, C. L. M., & Shapiro, A. (2004). Social well-being in the United States: A descriptive epidemiology. In Orville G. Brim, Carol Ryff, & Ronald Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 350–372). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keyes, C. L. M., & Waterman, M. B. (2003). Dimensions of well-being and mental health in adulthood. In M. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, & K. Moore (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development throughout the life course (pp. 477–497). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Keyes, C. L. M., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J. P., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC–SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15, 181–192.
Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
Kokko, K., Korkalainen, A., & Lyyra, A. L. (2012). Structure and continuity of well-being in mid-adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Happiness Studies,. doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9318-y.
Lamers, S. M. A., Glas, C. A. W., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012). Longitudinal evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF). Measurement invariance across demographics, physical illness, and mental illness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 290–296.
Lamers, S. M. A., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E. T., ten Klooster, P. M., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2011). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 99–110.
McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2010). Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being: Evidence of differential associations with experienced well-being. Social Indicators Research, 103, 93–108.
Muthen, L., & Muthen, B. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén e Muthén.
Nunnally, J., & Berstein, I. (1995). Psychometric theory. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.
Piccinelli, M., Bisoffi, G., Bon, M. G., Cunico, L., & Tansella, M. (1993). Validity and test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire in general practice: A comparison between three scoring methods. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 34(3), 198–205.
Piedrabissi, L., & Santinello, M. (1994). La validità del coping inventory for stressful situations di Endler e Parker. Ricerche di Psicologia, 4(18), 49–63.
Pinquart, M. (2002). Creating and maintaining purpose in life in old age: A meta-analysis. Ageing International, 27, 90–114.
Prezza, M., Costantini, S., Chiarolanza, V., & di Marco, S. (1999). La Scala italiana del senso di comunità. Psicologia della salute, 3–4, 135–158.
Prezza, M., Trombaccia, F., & Armento, L. (1997). La scala dell’autostima di Rosenberg: Traduzione e validazione italiana. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 223, 35–44.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychology Measure, 1(3), 385–401.
Robitschek, C., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). Keyes’ model of mental health with personal growth initiative as a parcimonious predictor. Journal of Counseling Psychology., 56, 321–329.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.
Salama-Younes, M., & Ismaïl, A. (2011). Validation of factor structure of mental health continuum (MHC–SF) for physically active older adults. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 4(1), 20–30.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1993). Measurement of perceived self-efficacy: Psychometric scales for cross-cultural research. Berlin: Freie Universität.
Sibilia, L., Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Italian Adaptation of the general self-efficacy scale. Resource document. Ralf Schwarzer web site. Accessed Jan 25, 2012 from http://www.ralfschwarzer.de/.
Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131–141.
Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988(54), 1063–1070.
Westerhof, G. J., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2010). Mental illness and mental health: The two continua model across the lifespan. Journal of Adult Development, 17, 110–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Italian Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (Adult: Ages 18 or Older)
Appendix: Italian Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (Adult: Ages 18 or Older)
Risponda alle domande che seguono riguardo a come si è sentito/a durante l’ultimo mese.
Risponda contrassegnando con una crocetta l’opzione che più si avvicina alla sua posizione.
Please answer the following questions are about how you have been feeling during the past month. Place a check mark in the box that best represents how often you have experienced or felt the following:
Nell’ultimo mese quanto spesso … [During the past month, how often did you feel…] | MAI [NEVER] | UNA O DUE VOLTE [ONCE OR TWICE] | CIRCA UNA VOLTA A SETTIMANA [ABOUT ONCE A WEEK] | CIRCA DUE O TRE VOLTE ALLA SETTIMANA [ABOUT 2 OR 3 TIMES A WEEK] | QUASI OGNI GIORNO [ALMOST EVERY DAY] | OGNI GIORNO [EVERY DAY] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.Ti sei sentito felice [Happy] | ||||||
2.Ti sei sentito interessato alla vita [Interested in life] | ||||||
3.Ti sei sentito soddisfatto [Satisfied with life] | ||||||
4.Hai sentito di poter fare qualcosa di importante per la società [That you had something important to contribute to society] | ||||||
5.Ti sei sentito parte di una comunità (un gruppo o il tuo quartiere) [That you belonged to a community (like a social group, or your neighborhood)] | ||||||
6.Hai sentito che la nostra società sta diventando un posto migliore per gente come te [That our society is a good place, or is becoming a better place, for all people] | ||||||
7.Hai sentito che le persone sono fondamentalmente buone [That people are basically good] | ||||||
8.Hai sentito che il modo in cui funziona la nostra società ha un senso per te [That the way our society works makes sense to you] | ||||||
9.Hai sentito che ti piacciono la maggior parte degli aspetti della tua personalità [That you liked most parts of your personality] | ||||||
10.Ti sei sentito bene nel gestire le responsabilità della tua vita quotidiana [Good at managing the responsibilities of your daily life] | ||||||
11.Hai sentito di avere delle relazioni sincere e cordiali con gli altri [That you had warm and trusting relationships with others] | ||||||
12.Hai sentito di aver avuto delle esperienze che ti hanno aiutato a crescere e a diventare una persona migliore [That you had experiences that challenged you to grow and become a better person] | ||||||
13.Ti sei sentito capace di pensare o esprimere le tue idee e opinioni [Confident to think or express your own ideas and opinions] | ||||||
14.Hai sentito che la tua vita ha un senso [That your life has a sense of direction or meaning to it] |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petrillo, G., Capone, V., Caso, D. et al. The Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) as a Measure of Well-Being in the Italian Context. Soc Indic Res 121, 291–312 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0629-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0629-3