Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Subjective Issues of Well-Being and Quality of Life in the European Statistical System

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decades, the European Statistical System has developed many European statistics and indicators to measure social progress and sustainable development. Initially only in a few cases the measuring instruments contained questions on subjective issues. With the adoption of its Communication on “gross domestic product and beyond” the Commission has given an impetus to the development of subjective social indicators. This has led to the establishment of a first set of indicators on quality of life and well-being and to a new instrument (the 2013 EU-SILC ad-hoc module for measuring subjective well-being). This new step in European statistics creates an important potential for researchers to engage in in-depth analysis and for national and European Union policy makers to use the resulting indicators—and in casu subjective well-being indicators—for developing and monitoring policy strategies and programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Further referred to as “the Commission”.

  2. Eurostat together with the national statistical authorities of the 27 Member States (MS) and of the EEA/EFTA countries.

  3. A first Social Policy Agenda run from 2000 to 2005; a second Social Policy Agenda covered the period 2006-2010.

  4. http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/framework_en.htm.

  5. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/making-it-happen/key-areas/index_en.htm.

  6. Representatives of most EU and the European Free Trade Area (EFTA) statistical offices as well as of European Central Bank (ECB), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and United Nations Economic Commission for Euro (UNECE) participated in this Group and its four Task forces.

  7. The Commission should consult the ESSC inter alia on developments and priorities in the European Statistical Programme.

  8. All reports and information on the Sponsorship Group can be found at the ESS website at:

    http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/pgp_ess/about_ess/measuring_progress.

  9. See especially in the Sponsorship Group Task force three on “multi-dimensional measurement of quality of life”.

  10. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/qualityoflife/eqls/third_party_research_2008.htm.

  11. For a number of these dimensions, such as “Productive and valued activities (including work)”, “Material living conditions”, “Governance and basic rights”, “Leisure and social interactions (inclusion/exclusion)”, “Natural and living environment”, “Economic and physical safety”, European statistics and comprehensive indicators sets are already available and are used to monitor the topical EU actions and national policies.

  12. Established by the European Directors of Social Statistics (DSS) and reporting back to the ESS.

  13. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/quality_life/introduction.

  14. EU-SILC cross-sectional data are available in the form of tables 12 months after the end of the data collection period while the longitudinal data are available 18 months after the end of the data collection. In addition, anonymised EU cross-sectional micro data files to be used for research purposes are available 15 months after the end of the data collection and 20 months for the longitudinal files.

  15. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/pgp_ess/about_ess/measuring_progress.

  16. I.e. Labour Force Survey, Adult Education Survey and European Health Interview Survey. The ESS also recommended to further develop an EU common approach for the Household Budget Survey and the Time Use Survey.

  17. Through the Open Method of Coordination or through Europe 2020.

  18. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/quality_life/introduction.

References

  • Eurofound. (2009). Second European quality of life survey—Overview. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). Decision no. 1177/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2005a). Working together, working better. No. COM(2005)706 final. European Commission, Brussels.

  • European Commission. (2005b). Healthy life years in the European Union: Facts and figures 2005. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). Decision no. 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 establishing a second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008–13). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009a). Regulation (EC) no. 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistic. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009b). GDP and beyond: Measuring progress in a changing world. No. COM(2009) 433 final. European Commission, Brussels.

  • European Commission. (2010a). Consolidated version of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010b). Europe 2020, a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. No. COM(2010)2020 final. European Commission, Brussels.

  • European Commission. (2010c). Subjective well-being and social policy. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Social report series. Report only available at http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Subjective+well-being+and+social+policy+OECD.

  • European Commission. (2012a). Commission decision 2012/504/EU on Eurostat. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012b). Commission Regulation (EU) No 62/2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No. 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) as regards the 2013 list of target secondary variables on well-being. European Commission, Brussels.

  • European Commission. (2013a). Commission Regulation (EU) No. 141/2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work, as regards statistics based on the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS). European Commission, Brussels.

  • European Commission. (2013b). Regulation (EU) no. 99/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European statistical programme 2013–17. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2010). Eurostat statistical book “income and living conditions in Europe”. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marleen De Smedt.

Appendices

Appendix 1

List of dimensions, topics and subtopics for which indicators are published on Eurostat’s website.Footnote 18

This list as well as the set of indicators will continuously be updated and completed.

Dimension

Topic/subtopics

(1) Material living conditions

1.1

Income

1.2

Consumption

 1.2.1

Constrained Consumption

 1.2.2

Non-market consumption and government provided services

1.3

Material conditions

 1.3.1

Material Deprivation

 1.3.2

Housing conditions

(2) Productive or main activity

2.1

Quantity of employment

 2.1.1

Unemployment

 2.1.2

Underemployment, quantity

 2.1.3

Underemployment, quality

2.2

Quality of employment

 2.2.1

In work poverty

 2.2.2

Health and safety at work

 2.2.3

Work/life balance

 2.2.4

Temporary work

 2.2.5

Perception of quality of employment

2.3

Other main activity

(3) Health

3.1

Outcomes

 3.1.1

Life expectancy

 3.1.2

Morbidity and health status

3.2

Drivers: (un) healthy behaviours

3.3

Access to healthcare

(4) Education

4.1

Competences and skills

 4.1.1

Educational attainment

 4.1.2

Self-reported skills

 4.1.3

Assessed skills PIAAC

4.2

Lifelong learning

4.3

Opportunities for education

(5) Leisure and social interactions

5.1

Leisure

 5.1.1

Quantity of leisure

 5.1.2

Quality of leisure

 5.1.3

Access

5.2

Social interactions

 5.2.1

Activities with people (including feelings of loneliness)

 5.2.2

Activities for people (volunteering and care)

 5.2.3

Supportive relationships

 5.2.4

Social cohesion (interpersonal trust, perceived tensions, inequalities)

(6) Economic and physical safety

6.1

Economic security and vulnerability

 6.1.1

Wealth (assets)

 6.1.2

Debt

 6.1.3

Income insecurity (including job)

6.2

Physical and personal security

 6.2.1

Crime

 6.2.2

Perception of physical safety

(7) Governance and basic rights

7.1

Institutions and public services

 7.1.1

Trust and/or satisfaction in institutions

 7.1.2

Trust and/or satisfaction in public services

7.2

Discrimination and equal opportunities

7.3

Active citizenship

(8) Natural and living environment

8.1

Pollution (including noise)

8.2

Access to green and recreational spaces

8.3

Landscape an built environment

(9) Overall experience of life

9.1

Life Satisfaction

9.2

Affects

9.3

Meaning and purpose

Appendix 2

Variables of the 2013 ad-hoc module on “Subjective well-being” for EU-SILC

  1. I.

    Overall experience of life (2)

    • Overall life satisfaction

    • Meaning of life

  2. II.

    Material living conditions (2)

    • Satisfaction with financial situation

    • Satisfaction with accommodation

  3. III.

    Health (5)

    • Being very nervous

    • Feeling down in the dumps

    • Feeling calm and peaceful

    • Feeling downhearted or depressed

    • Being happy

  4. IV.

    Productive and valued activities (3)

    • Job satisfaction

    • Satisfaction with commuting time

    • Satisfaction with time use

  5. V.

    Governance and basic rights (3)

    • Trust in the political system

    • Trust in the legal system

    • Trust in the police

  6. VI.

    Leisure and social interactions (4)

    • Satisfaction with personal relationships

    • Personal matters (anyone to discuss with)

    • Help from others

    • Trust in others

  7. VII.

    Natural and living environment (2)

    • Satisfaction with recreational and green areas

    • Satisfaction with living environment

  8. VIII.

    Economic and physical safety (1)

    • Physical security

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Smedt, M. Measuring Subjective Issues of Well-Being and Quality of Life in the European Statistical System. Soc Indic Res 114, 153–167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0389-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0389-5

Keywords

Navigation