Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health, Quality of Life and Population Density: A Preliminary Study on “Contextualized” Quality of Life

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality of life concerns individual (physical and psychological health), interpersonal (social relationships) and contextual (environment) aspects, which are both subjective and objective. In considering contextual characteristics, empirical findings have demonstrated that people’s relation to their living environment is a key issue for their well-being. However, until now literature has paid little attention to population density as an element affecting quality of life. The present study aimed at assessing the predictive role of population density on the several domains of quality of life, along with socio-demographic characteristics and physical diseases. Participants were 344 subjects living in the Northern Italy area. A questionnaire with WHO Quality of Life Brief Scale, a checklist of chronic diseases and a socio-demographic form was used to collect data. Results showed that population density influences psychological, relational and environmental quality of life. Theoretical and policy implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annett, H., & Nickson, P. J. (1991). Community involvement in health: Why is it necessary? Tropical Doctor, 21, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, C. J., Cummins, R. A., & Lo, S. K. (2000). The quality of rural and metropolitan life. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52, 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 764–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10, 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J., & Mueller, K. (1995). Access to health care: Urban-rural comparisons from a Midwestern agricultural state. Journal of Rural Health, 11, 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, G. (2008). Geografia della salute in contesti urbani. In G. Nuvolati & M. Tognetti Bordogna (Eds.), Salute, ambiente e qualità della vita nel contesto urbano [Health, environment and quality of life in the urban context] (pp. 97–150). Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, V., Torgersen, S., & Kringlen, E. (2004). Quality of life in a city: The effect of population density. Social Indicators Research, 69, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicator Research, 52, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Girolamo, G. (2001). Il WHOQOL-100. In G. De Girolamo (Ed.), WHOQOL, Salute e Qualità della Vita [WHOQOL, health and QoL] (pp. 5–39). Torino: CSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2000). The state and fate of nations: implications of subjective measures of personal and social quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 52, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, T., & Whelan, C. T. (2005). First European quality of life survey: Income inequalities and deprivation. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galea, S., Freudenberg, N., & Vlahov, D. (2005). Cities and population health. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 1017–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, L. C., Glonek, G. F. V., Luszcz, M. A., & Andrews, G. R. (2005). Effect of social networks on 10-year survival in very old Australians: The Australian longitudinal study of aging. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 574–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holley, H. L. (1998). Geography and mental health: A review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, 535–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT. (2007). Condizioni di salute, fattori di rischio e ricorso ai servizi sanitari, Anno 2005. [Health condition, risk factors and use of sanitary services] Nota per la stampa, 2 marzo 2007.

  • Judd, F. K., Jackson, H. J., Komiti, A., Murray, G., Hodgins, G., & Fraser, C. (2002). High prevalence disorders in urban and rural communities. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2003). Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kroneman, M., Verheij, R., Tacken, M., & Van der Zee, J. (2010). Urban-rural health differences: Primary care data and self reported data render different results. Health & Place, 16, 893–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, S. L., & Fleishman, J. A. (2003). Rural-urban differences in usual source of care and ambulatory service use: Analyses of national data using urban influence codes. Medical Care, 41(Suppl. 7), III65–IIII74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcellini, F., Giuli, C., Gagliardi, C., & Papa, R. (2007). Aging in Italy: Urban–rural differences. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 44, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2004). The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. New York: Times Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, T. W., & Adair, L. S. (2001). Defining the “urban” in urbanization and health: A factor analysis approach. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. (2000). Health and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 51, 245–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. E. (1971). Some social implications of high density housing. American Sociological Review, 36, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2001). La Méthode 5. L’Humanité de l’Humanité Tome 1: L’identité Humaine [Method, humanity of humanity, Vol. 5. Human identity.]. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2010a). Does place attachment affect social well-being? European Review of Applied Psychology, 60, 233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2010b). Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schur, C. L., & Franco, S. J. (1999). Access to health care. In T. C. Ricketts (Ed.), Rural health in the United States (pp. 25–37). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, T. E., Lusignolo, T. M., Albert, M., & Berkman, L. (2001). Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: Mac-Arthur studies of successful aging. American Psychological Association, 20, 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. (2011). Theoretical perspectives guiding QOL indicator projects. Social Indicators Research, 103, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, R. (2003). Rural health around the world: Challenges and solutions. Family Practice, 20, 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tartaglia, S. (2006). A preliminary study for a new model of sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D., Murray, S. J., & Thomas, J. A. (2008). Relationships between population density and the perceived quality of neighbourhood. Social Indicators Research, 89, 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, M., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). Objective and perceived neighborhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated health: An analysis of older adults in Cook County, Illinois. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2575–2590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1999). Community participation in local health and sustainable development: A working document on approaches and techniques. Copenhagen: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BRIEF quality of life instrument. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by a co-financed Fellowship Programme: The University of Turin and the Piedmont Region. The research was also partially funded by the Piedmont Region, in relation to the project “Report on health and welfare services in Piedmont” (with University of Piemonte Orientale). The authors wish to thank the individuals who participated in the interviews and Mrs. Barbara Wade for her linguistic advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Rollero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fassio, O., Rollero, C. & De Piccoli, N. Health, Quality of Life and Population Density: A Preliminary Study on “Contextualized” Quality of Life. Soc Indic Res 110, 479–488 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9940-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9940-4

Keywords

Navigation