Abstract
Quality of life concerns individual (physical and psychological health), interpersonal (social relationships) and contextual (environment) aspects, which are both subjective and objective. In considering contextual characteristics, empirical findings have demonstrated that people’s relation to their living environment is a key issue for their well-being. However, until now literature has paid little attention to population density as an element affecting quality of life. The present study aimed at assessing the predictive role of population density on the several domains of quality of life, along with socio-demographic characteristics and physical diseases. Participants were 344 subjects living in the Northern Italy area. A questionnaire with WHO Quality of Life Brief Scale, a checklist of chronic diseases and a socio-demographic form was used to collect data. Results showed that population density influences psychological, relational and environmental quality of life. Theoretical and policy implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annett, H., & Nickson, P. J. (1991). Community involvement in health: Why is it necessary? Tropical Doctor, 21, 3–5.
Best, C. J., Cummins, R. A., & Lo, S. K. (2000). The quality of rural and metropolitan life. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52, 69–74.
Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 764–775.
Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10, 255–270.
Comer, J., & Mueller, K. (1995). Access to health care: Urban-rural comparisons from a Midwestern agricultural state. Journal of Rural Health, 11, 7–16.
Costa, G. (2008). Geografia della salute in contesti urbani. In G. Nuvolati & M. Tognetti Bordogna (Eds.), Salute, ambiente e qualità della vita nel contesto urbano [Health, environment and quality of life in the urban context] (pp. 97–150). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Cramer, V., Torgersen, S., & Kringlen, E. (2004). Quality of life in a city: The effect of population density. Social Indicators Research, 69, 103–116.
Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicator Research, 52, 55–72.
Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.
De Girolamo, G. (2001). Il WHOQOL-100. In G. De Girolamo (Ed.), WHOQOL, Salute e Qualità della Vita [WHOQOL, health and QoL] (pp. 5–39). Torino: CSE.
Eckersley, R. (2000). The state and fate of nations: implications of subjective measures of personal and social quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 52, 3–27.
Fahey, T., & Whelan, C. T. (2005). First European quality of life survey: Income inequalities and deprivation. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.
Galea, S., Freudenberg, N., & Vlahov, D. (2005). Cities and population health. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 1017–1033.
Giles, L. C., Glonek, G. F. V., Luszcz, M. A., & Andrews, G. R. (2005). Effect of social networks on 10-year survival in very old Australians: The Australian longitudinal study of aging. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 574–579.
Holley, H. L. (1998). Geography and mental health: A review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, 535–542.
ISTAT. (2007). Condizioni di salute, fattori di rischio e ricorso ai servizi sanitari, Anno 2005. [Health condition, risk factors and use of sanitary services] Nota per la stampa, 2 marzo 2007.
Judd, F. K., Jackson, H. J., Komiti, A., Murray, G., Hodgins, G., & Fraser, C. (2002). High prevalence disorders in urban and rural communities. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 104–113.
Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2003). Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kroneman, M., Verheij, R., Tacken, M., & Van der Zee, J. (2010). Urban-rural health differences: Primary care data and self reported data render different results. Health & Place, 16, 893–902.
Larson, S. L., & Fleishman, J. A. (2003). Rural-urban differences in usual source of care and ambulatory service use: Analyses of national data using urban influence codes. Medical Care, 41(Suppl. 7), III65–IIII74.
Marcellini, F., Giuli, C., Gagliardi, C., & Papa, R. (2007). Aging in Italy: Urban–rural differences. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 44, 243–260.
Marmot, M. (2004). The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. New York: Times Book.
McDade, T. W., & Adair, L. S. (2001). Defining the “urban” in urbanization and health: A factor analysis approach. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 55–70.
Michalos, A. C., Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. (2000). Health and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 51, 245–286.
Mitchell, R. E. (1971). Some social implications of high density housing. American Sociological Review, 36, 18–29.
Morin, E. (2001). La Méthode 5. L’Humanité de l’Humanité Tome 1: L’identité Humaine [Method, humanity of humanity, Vol. 5. Human identity.]. Paris: Seuil.
Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2010a). Does place attachment affect social well-being? European Review of Applied Psychology, 60, 233–238.
Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2010b). Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 198–205.
Schur, C. L., & Franco, S. J. (1999). Access to health care. In T. C. Ricketts (Ed.), Rural health in the United States (pp. 25–37). New York: Oxford University Press.
Seeman, T. E., Lusignolo, T. M., Albert, M., & Berkman, L. (2001). Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: Mac-Arthur studies of successful aging. American Psychological Association, 20, 243–255.
Sirgy, M. J. (2011). Theoretical perspectives guiding QOL indicator projects. Social Indicators Research, 103, 1–22.
Strasser, R. (2003). Rural health around the world: Challenges and solutions. Family Practice, 20, 457–463.
Tartaglia, S. (2006). A preliminary study for a new model of sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 25–36.
Walton, D., Murray, S. J., & Thomas, J. A. (2008). Relationships between population density and the perceived quality of neighbourhood. Social Indicators Research, 89, 405–420.
Wen, M., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). Objective and perceived neighborhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated health: An analysis of older adults in Cook County, Illinois. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2575–2590.
WHO. (1999). Community participation in local health and sustainable development: A working document on approaches and techniques. Copenhagen: WHO.
WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BRIEF quality of life instrument. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by a co-financed Fellowship Programme: The University of Turin and the Piedmont Region. The research was also partially funded by the Piedmont Region, in relation to the project “Report on health and welfare services in Piedmont” (with University of Piemonte Orientale). The authors wish to thank the individuals who participated in the interviews and Mrs. Barbara Wade for her linguistic advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fassio, O., Rollero, C. & De Piccoli, N. Health, Quality of Life and Population Density: A Preliminary Study on “Contextualized” Quality of Life. Soc Indic Res 110, 479–488 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9940-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9940-4