Abstract
We examined the extent to which satisfaction with life, with one’s self, and with one’s day are predicted by pleasure, purpose in life, interest, and mood. In a sample of 222 college students we found that both satisfaction with life and self-esteem were best predicted by positive feelings and an absence of negative feelings, as well as purpose in life. By contrast, satisfaction with individual days was predicted by negative feelings, and very strongly predicted by positive feelings, but not by purpose in life. In predicting life satisfaction purpose in life provided a buffering effect for lower levels of mood. People high in purpose in life reported high levels of life satisfaction even with moderate levels of mood. Thus, what makes a satisfying day is different from what makes a satisfying life or self. Life and self satisfaction were predicted significantly by purpose in life even after controlling for physical pleasure and affect balance, suggesting that they are more than just hedonic variables.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biswas-Diener, R., Vittersø, J., & Diener, E. (2005). Most people are mildly happy, but there is cultural variation: The Inughuit, the Amish and the Maasai. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 205–226.
Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crumbaugh, J. C. (1968). Cross validation of Purpose-in-Life test based on Frankl’s concepts. Journal of Individual Psychology, 24, 74–81.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Fowers, B., Mollica, C., & Procacci, E. (2010). Constitutive and instrumental goal orientations and their relations with eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 139–153.
Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.
Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage.
Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Curious: Discover the missing ingredient to a fulfilling life. New York: William Morrow.
Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.
Keyes, C., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: Distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 197–201.
King, L. A. & Hicks, J. A. (2009). The detection and construction of meaning in life events. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 317–330.
King, L., & Scollon, C. (2011). What people really want in life and why it matters: contributions from research on folk theories of the good life. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology as social change. Dordrecht: Springer Academic Press.
Kopperud, K. H., & Vittersø, J. (2008). Distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Results from a day reconstruction study among Norwegian jobholders. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 174–181.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological review, 110(1), 145–172.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review Psychology, 52, 141–166.
Ryan, R. M., & Huta, V. (2009). Wellness as healthy functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 202–204.
Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.
Scollon, C. N., & Wirtz, D. (2010). Is the good life happy, meaningful, or wealthy? Cultural differences and the context-sensitive self. Manuscript under review.
Sheldon, K., & Elliot, A. (1999). Goal striving, need-satisfaction, and longitudinal wellbeing: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.
Vitterso, J., Oelmann, H. I., & Wang, A. L. (2009). Life satisfaction is not a balanced estimator of the good life: Evidence from reaction time measures and self-reported emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 1–17.
Waterman, A. S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudaimonia when considering the hedonic treadmill. American Psychologist, 62, 612–613.
Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diener, E., Fujita, F., Tay, L. et al. Purpose, Mood, and Pleasure in Predicting Satisfaction Judgments. Soc Indic Res 105, 333–341 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9787-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9787-8