Abstract
The Subjective Wellbeing (SWB) literature is replete with competing theories detailing the mechanisms underlying the construction and maintenance of SWB. The current study aimed to compare and contrast two of these approaches: multiple discrepancies theory (MDT) and an affective-cognitive theory of SWB. MDT posits SWB to be the result of perceived discrepancies between multiple standards of comparison. By contrast, affective-cognitive theory asserts that SWB is primarily influenced by trait affect, and indirectly influenced by personality and cognition through trait affect. Participants comprised 387 individuals who responded to the 5th longitudinal survey of the Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Results of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) indicated the poorest fit to the data for the MDT model. The affective-cognitive model also did not provide a good fit to the data. A purely affective model provided the best fit to the data, was the most parsimonious, and explained 66% of variance in SWB.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, F. M., & Robinson, J. P. (1991). Measures of subjective wellbeing. In J. P. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes (pp. 61–114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American’s perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.
Brebner, J., Donaldson, J., Kirby, N., & Ward, L. (1995). Relationships between personality and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 251–258.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cha, K.-H. (2003). Subjective wellbeing among college students. Social Indicators Research, 62–63, 455–477.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Lo, S. K., Okerstrom, E., Hunter, B., & Davern, M. (2004). Australian unity wellbeing index: Cumulative psychometric record. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from Deakin University, Australian Centre on Quality of Life Website: http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. (2002). A model of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: The role of personality. In E. Gullone & R. A. Cummins (Eds.), The universality of subjective wellbeing indicators: A multi-disciplinary and multi-national perspective (pp. 7–46). London: Kluwer.
Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Gibson, A., Lai, L., Weinberg, M., & Collard, J. (2008). Australian unity wellbeing index, survey 20. Retrieved December 3, 2008, from Deakin University, Australian Centre on Quality of Life Website: http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
Davern, M. T. (2004). Subjective wellbeing as an affective construct. Dissertation, Deakin University, Australia.
Davern, M. T., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective wellbeing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157.
Diener, E. (1996). Traits are powerful, but are not enough: Lessons from subjective wellbeing. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 389–399.
Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7(3), 181–185.
Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective wellbeing. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2004). Subjective emotional well-being. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 325–337). New York: Guilford.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective wellbeing: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.
Forgas, J. P., & Moylan, S. (1987). After the movies: Transient mood and social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(4), 467–477.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
Gurin, G., Veroff, J., & Feld, S. (1960). Americans view their mental health. New York: Basic Books.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life-events and subjective wellbeing: Towards a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–734.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness. A theory of subjective wellbeing. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Happiness, introversion–extroversion and happy introverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 595–608.
Hu, L., & Bentler, L. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
International Wellbeing Group. (2005). Personal wellbeing index. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. Retrieved May 15, 2005, from: http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of wellbeing measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.
Michalos, A. C. (1980). Satisfaction and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 8(4), 385–422.
Michalos, A. C. (1982). The satisfaction and happiness of some senior citizens in rural Ontario. Social Indicators Research, 11(1), 1–30.
Michalos, A. C. (1983). Satisfaction and happiness in a rural northern resource community. Social Indicators Research, 13(3), 225–252.
Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.
Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.
Pavot, W. G., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of wellbeing measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.
Russell, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–819.
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective wellbeing: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage.
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Kommer, D., & Wagner, D. (1987). Soccer, rooms and the quality of your life: Mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific life-domains. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 69–79.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Vitterso, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective well-being: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 903–914.
Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 600–619.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award (Industry) from the Australian Research Council to the first author, as part of an Australian Research Council Industry Partnership Grant with Australian Unity. Chief investigators on this grant were Robert Cummins, David Mellor, Lucy Firth, and Mark Stokes. The research was completed whilst the first author was a PhD candidate in the School of Psychology at Deakin University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blore, J.D., Stokes, M.A., Mellor, D. et al. Comparing Multiple Discrepancies Theory to Affective Models of Subjective Wellbeing. Soc Indic Res 100, 1–16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9599-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9599-2