Abstract
The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) is a widely accepted and widely used tool for measuring well-being. Although its potential as a cross-cultural index is recognized, an introduction and systematic validation of the Hebrew version is needed. Thus, the purpose of this study is: (1) to describe the process of developing the Hebrew version of the SWLS, and (2) to examine its construct validity as well as its internal consistency. Four hundred and eighty seven working adults completed the following self reported Hebrew language versions of the: (1) SWLS, (2) positive affect and negative affect scales (PANAS), and (3) the self-rated health (SRH) scale. In addition, as way of gathering additional evidence of validity, the SWLS was completed by proxy (i.e., each participant’s life partner or significant other). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a single-factor structure with significant correlations between the SWLS and the rest of the measures—PANAS scores, the SRH scores as well as the SWLS scores as measured by proxy. In addition, item-analysis supports the internal consistency of the scale. The Hebrew version of the SWLS is a valid and reliable scale and can be utilized in the Israeli context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrindell, W. A., Meeuwesen, L., & Huyse, F. J. (1991). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS)—psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 117–123. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90094-R.
Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I. U., & Garcia-Merita, M. (2000). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in adolescents. Psicothema, 12, 314–319.
Ayyash-Abdo, H., & Alamuddin, R. (2007). Predictors of subjective well-being among college youth in Lebanon. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 265–284. doi:10.3200/SOCP.147.3.265-284.
Bentler, P. M. (1985). Theory and implication of EQS: A structural equations program. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations programs manual. Enrico, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
Carmel, S., Baron-Epel, O., & Shemy, G. (2007). The will-to-live and survival at old age: Gender differences. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 518–523.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.
Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157. doi:10.1007/BF01207052.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.
Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., da Fonseca, P. N., & Coelho, J. A. P. M. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 267–277. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9257-0.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Hultell, D., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070–1079. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.030.
Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). An evaluation of subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 17, 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF00354108.
Lawrence, R. J. (2006). Housing and health: Beyond disciplinary confinement. Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 83, 540–549.
Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Smékal, V., & Dorahy, M. J. (1999). Factor structure and reliability of a Czech translation of the satisfaction with life scale among Czech university students. Studia Psychologica, 41, 239–244.
Miilunpalo, S., Vuori, I., Oja, P., Pasanen, M., & Urponen, H. (1997). Self-rated health status as a health measure: The predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 517–528. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00045-0.
Neto, F. (1993). The satisfaction with life scale—psychometrics properties in an adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22(2), 125–134. doi:10.1007/BF01536648.
Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990. doi:10.1177/01461672992511006.
Paul-Dauphin, A., Guillemin, F., Virion, J. M., & Briancon, S. (1999). Bias and precision in visual analogue scales: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Epidemiology, 150, 1117–1127.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164.
Sachs, J. (2003). Validation of the satisfaction with life scale in a sample of Hong Kong university students. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 225–234. doi:10.2117/psysoc.2003.225.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology—an introduction. The American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.
Slocum-Gori, S. L., Zumbo, B. D., Michalos, A. C., & Diener, E. (in press). A note on the dimensionality of quality of life scales: An illustration with the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). Social Indicators Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal of Quality of Life Measurement.
Smead, V. S. (1991). Measuring well-being is not eazy. Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology.
Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Malay satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 92, 25–33.
Vassar, M. (2008). A note on the score reliability for the satisfaction with life scale: An RG study. Social Indicators Research, 86, 47–57. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9113-7.
Vitterso, J., Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2005). The divergent meanings of life satisfaction: Item response modeling of the satisfaction with life scale in Greenland and Norway. Social Indicators Research, 74, 327–348. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-4644-7.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
World Health Organization. (1993). WHOQOL study protocol. Geneva Switzerland: WHO (MNH/PSF/93.9).
Wu, C. H., & Wu, C. Y. (2008). Life satisfaction in persons with schizophrenia living in the community—validation of the satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 85, 447–460. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9136-0.
Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259–1268. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: The Hebrew Version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale
Appendix: The Hebrew Version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anaby, D., Jarus, T. & Zumbo, B.D. Psychometric Evaluation of the Hebrew Language Version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Soc Indic Res 96, 267–274 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9476-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9476-z