Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subjective Well-Being as an Indicator for Clinical Depression

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Theory of Homeostasis posits that Subjective Well-being (SWB) is regulated by a dynamic biological mechanism, assisting to maintain a positive view of life. Further, the theory suggests that clinical depression is the loss of SWB due to the defeat of this homeostatic defence system. To test this hypothesis it was predicted that people who were diagnosed as clinically depressed with the Semi-structured Clinical Interview (SCID-1/NP) based on the DSM-IV-TR Axis 1 would have a Personal Well-being Index-Adult (PWI-A) score below the normative range (70–80% of scale maximum). Following ethical approval a sample of 146 men was obtained and each was assessed on the SCID-1/NP and on the PWI-A. Subjects diagnosed as having one of several pathologies such as post traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, social phobia and specific phobia were found to score significantly lower on the PWI-A compared to participants who received no diagnosis. However, as the data did not discriminate between currently depressed and persons with other non-depressive psychopathologies, a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to explore this data further. Results indicated that the PWI-A was significantly better than guessing in discriminating clinically depressed cases, but only just so. Therefore, while this research found support for the proposition that the loss of SWB indicated clinical depression, the PWI-A is not sufficiently specific for diagnosis, nor can it be concluded that all instances of depression is the failure of SWB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Revised 4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). National Health Survey: Summary of results, Australia 2004–2005, cat. No. 4364.0. Canberra: ABS.

  • Babin, P. R. (2003). Diagnosing depression in persons with brain injuries: A look at theories, the DSM-IV and depression measures. Brain Injury: [BI], 17, 889–900. doi:10.1080/0269905031000088595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownhill, S., Wilhelm, K., Barclay, L., & Schmied, V. (2005). Big build: Hidden depression in men. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 921–931. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01665.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, S. V., & Rabinowitz, F. E. (2000). Men and depression: Clinical and empirical perspectives. Sydney: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. (2003). Subjective well-being: An integration of depression, stress and homeostasis theory. Doctoral thesis, Deakin University, Melbourne. http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/thesis/Cook.doc.

  • Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200. doi:10.1007/BF01079026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1998). The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334. doi:10.1023/A:1006831107052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72. doi:10.1023/A:1007027822521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225–256. doi:10.1023/A:1024712527648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2006). Australian unity wellbeing index: Fifth anniversary special report—summarizing the major findings. Survey 14.1. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.

  • Cummins, R. A., & Gullone, E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. In Proceedings, Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities (pp. 74–93). Singapore: National University of Singapore.

  • Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2006). Using health and subjective well-being for quality of life measurement: A review. In L. Bauld, K. Clarke, & T. Maltby (Eds.), Social policy review. Analysis and debate in social policy (Vol. 18, pp. 165–192). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Lau, A. L. D., & Davern, M. (2007). Homeostatic mechanisms and subjective well-being. In Handbook of social indicators and quality of life studies. New York: Springer. (in press).

  • Davern, M., & Cummins, R. A. (2006). Is life dissatisfaction the opposite of life satisfaction? Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, 1–7. doi:10.1080/00049530500125124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective well-being as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9066-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick, C. (2004). Beyond depression: A new approach to understanding and management. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, research version, Non-Patient Edition (SCID-I/NP). New York: Biometrics Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J. F., & Harrow, M. (2005). Subjective life satisfaction and objective functional outcome in bipolar and unipolar mood disorders: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 89, 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haybron, D. M. (2000). Two philosophical problems in the study of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 207–225. doi:10.1023/A:1010075527517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life-events and subjective well-being: Towards a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–734. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284–304. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index-Adult (PWI-A) English (4th ed.). Manual. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.

  • Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewinson, P. M., Redner, J. E., & Seeley, J. R. (1991). The relationship between life satisfaction and psychosocial variables: New perspectives. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being (pp. 141–169). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, C. E., Herman, B. A., & Shen, J. H. (1998). Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 1033–1051. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980515)17:9<1033::AID-SIM784>3.0.CO;2-Z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ried, L. D., Tueth, M. J., Handberg, E., & Nyanteh, H. (2003). Validating a self report measure of global subjective well-being to predict adverse clinical outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 15, 675–686. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-3515-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, S. M., Vythilingam, M., & Charney, D. S. (2005). The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: Implications for prevention and treatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 255–291. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS. (2007). Version 14.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL.

  • Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1091–1102. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1991). Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being, an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 7–26). London: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2001). Quality of life and happiness: Not quite the same. In G. DeGirolamo, et al. (Eds.), Salute e qualità dell vida (pp. 67–95). Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/8753.

  • Veenhoven, R. (2004). Subjective measures of well-being. Discussion Paper N2004/07. Rotterdam: United Nations University—World Institute for Development Economics Research.

  • Zanarini, M. C., Skodol, A. E., Bender, D., Dolan, R., Sanislow, C., Schaefer, E., et al. (2000). The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study: Reliability of Axis I and II diagnoses. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Waterfront Campus, Level 3, 27 Brougham Street, Geelong, VIC, 3217, Australia

    R. Adriana Gargiulo & Mark A. Stokes

Authors
  1. R. Adriana Gargiulo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark A. Stokes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Stokes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gargiulo, R.A., Stokes, M.A. Subjective Well-Being as an Indicator for Clinical Depression. Soc Indic Res 92, 517–527 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9301-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9301-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation