Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Marital Status and Social Well-Being: Are the Married Always Better Off?

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The positive link between marriage and physical and psychological well-being is well established, but whether marriage is associated with social well-being is not. Using nationally representative data from the MIDUS study (N = 3,032), the present study examines the degree to which there are marital status differences in perceived social well-being, to what extent marital histories affect perceived social well-being, and the degree to which findings vary between social well-being and psychological well-being outcomes. We find that married persons do not have a decisive social well-being advantage over unmarried persons. However, married persons do have a significant social well-being advantage over non-married cohabitors. Additionally, marital history matters little to the perceived social well-being of our respondents. Comparisons with psychological well-being measures indicate substantial differences in the effect of marital status on individual-level well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F., & Withey, S. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A. E. (1999). Social support and life satisfaction among the never married: Examining the effects of age. Research on Aging, 21, 46–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A. E. (2000). Marital trajectories and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., & Amato, P. (1991). Divorce and psychological stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 396–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canty-Mitchell, J., & Zimet, G. D. (2000). Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social supports in urban adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornman, J. C., Goldman, N., Glei, D. A., Weinstein, M., & Chang, M.-C. (2003). Social ties and perceived support: Two dimensions of social relationships and health among the elderly in Taiwan. Journal of Aging and Health, 15, 616–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L., Avison, W. R., & McAlpine, D. D. (1997). Significant life experiences and depression among single and married mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMaris, A., & Rao, V. (1992). Pre-marital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability in the United States: A reassessment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, J., & Casper, L. M. (2001). America’s families and living arrangements: March 2000. Current Population Reports, P20-537. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Glenn, N. D., & Weaver, C. (1988). The changing relationship of marital status and happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R. M. & Warren, J. R. (1996). A socioeconomic index for occupations in the 1990 Census. Working Paper #96-01. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Horwitz, A. V., & White, H. R. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, S40–S45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, J. S., & Acock, A. C. (1990). The effects of marital status on the form and composition of social networks. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M., & Broese van Groenou, M. M. (2005). Differential effects of divorce on social integration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., & Essex, M. (1982). Marital status and depression: The importance of coping resources. Social Forces, 61, 484–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., & McLeod, J. D. (1985). Social support and mental health in community samples. In S. Cohen, & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 219–240). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., & Shapiro, A. (2004). Social well-being in the United States: A descriptive epidemiology (pp. 350–372). In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we?: A national study of well-being a midlife. University of Chicago Press.

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L., & Frankel, M. R. (1974). Inference from complex samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreider, R. M. (2005). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 2001. Current Population Reports, P70-97). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Kurdek, L. A. (1991). The relationship between reported well-being and divorce history, availability of a proximate adult, and gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. S. (1993). The measurement of social well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. S. (1996). The World Health Organization’s definition of health: Social versus spiritual health. Social Indicators Research, 38, 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, N. F. (1996). Flying solo at midlife: Gender, marital status, and psychological well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 917–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastekaasa, A. (1992). Marriage and psychological well-being: Some evidence on selection into marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 901–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastekaasa, A. (1994). Psychological well-being and marital dissolution: Selection effects? Journal of Family Issues, 15, 208–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1987). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1989). The social causes of psychological distress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch, A., McPherson, J. M. & Smith-Lovin, L. (1997). Gender, children and social contact: The effect of childrearing for men and women. American Sociological Review, 16, 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. L. (1998). Marriage in men’s lives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand, A. M. (1996). The precious and the precocious: Understanding cumulative disadvantage and cumulative advantage over the life course. The Gerontologist, 36, 230–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L., & Johnson, J. (1977). Marital status, life strains and depression. American Sociological Review, 42, 704–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L., & Reiger, D. (1991). Psychiatric disorders in America: The epidemiological catchment area study. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E. (1995). Reconceptualizing marital status as a continuum of social attachment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (1998). Marital status, general life satisfaction and the welfare state: A cross-national comparison. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 39, 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. D. (1996). Explaining psychological distress in a sample of remarried and divorced persons: The influence of economic distress. Journal of Family Issues, 17(2), 186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. (2002). Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1065–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. E. (1963). On social regression. American Sociological Review, 28, 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (1991). Cohabiting and marital aggression: The role of social isolation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 669–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M. (1995). Social psychology and health. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. J., Wheaton, B., & Lloyd, D. (1995). The epidemiology of social stress. American Sociological Review, 60, 104–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., & Gove, W. R (1989). Parenthood and psychological well-being: Theory, measurement and stage in the family life course. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 440–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Wortman, C. B., & Kessler, R. C. (1992). Widowhood and depression: Explaining long-term differences in vulnerability. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, J., Lewis, J., & Blakeslee, S. 2000. The unexpected legacy of divorce: A 25 year landmark study. Hyperion Books.

  • Waite, L. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L., & Gallagher, M. (2000). A case for marriage. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willitts, M., Benzeval, M., & Stansfeld, S. (2004). Partnership history and mental health over Time. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1948). World Health Organization Constitution. Basic documents. Geneva.

Download references

Acknowledgements

A prior version of this paper was presented at the 2002 Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America. Special thanks participants of the 1999 & 2000 Midlife in the United States summer workshop for their ideas. The MIDUS study was funded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Midlife Development (MIDMAC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Shapiro.

Appendix 1 Social Well-Being Scales: Items and Scale Reliabilities

Appendix 1 Social Well-Being Scales: Items and Scale Reliabilities

Social coherence (α = .64)

  • The world is too complex for me.

  • I cannot make sense of what’s going on in the world.

  • I find it easy to predict what will happen next in society.

Social integration (α = .73)

  • I don’t feel I belong to anything I’d call a community.

  • I feel close to other people in my community.

  • My community is a source of comfort.

Social contribution (α = .64)

  • I have something valuable to give to the world.

  • My daily activities do not produce anything worthwhile for my community.

  • I have nothing important to contribute to society.

Social actualization (α = .64)

  • The world is becoming a better place for everyone.

  • Society has stopped making progress.

  • Society isn’t improving for people like me.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, A., Keyes, C.L.M. Marital Status and Social Well-Being: Are the Married Always Better Off?. Soc Indic Res 88, 329–346 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9194-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9194-3

Keywords

Navigation