Skip to main content
Log in

Under Pressure: Differentiating Adolescents’ Expectations Regarding Stereotypic Masculine and Feminine Behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study provided a novel way to compare the pressure felt by adolescents to engage in same gender behavior and other gender behavior. A new scale of felt pressure was developed which measured the reactions participants anticipated from others if they were to engage in masculine or feminine stereotyped behaviors. The scale was tested on a sample of 297 Australian adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17. Factor analysis indicated two factors which corresponded to Masculine-Typed and Feminine-Typed behaviors. Items related to feminine-typed behaviors were designated as same gender for young women and other gender for young men, and vice versa for masculine-typed items. Analyses indicated that young men reported higher felt pressure to conform to same gender behavior than did young women, and young women reported felt pressure to conform to other gender behavior whereas young men reported pressure to avoid other gender behavior. In addition, high same gender felt pressure was associated with higher self-perceived same gender typicality and lower other gender typicality. Conversely, high other gender felt pressure was associated with high levels of other gender typicality and lower levels of same gender typicality. The presence of same and other gender felt pressure encourages theorists and practitioners to be mindful of the impact of both these influences on adolescents’ gender identity development and psychosocial adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (2001). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985079.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). My school website. Retrieved from http://www.myschool.edu.au.

  • Braun, S. S., & Davidson, A. J. (2017). Gender (non)conformity in middle childhood: A mixed methods approach to understanding gender-typed behavior, friendship, and peer preference. Sex Roles, 77(1–2), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0693-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K. (2011). Gender identity development. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 603–628). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, P., Yunger, J., & Perry, D. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. A Journal of Research, 49(3), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024423012063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, P. (2014). Gender self-discrepancies in middle childhood: influences on children’s personal and social adjustment (doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University). Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses database. (UMI no. 3647552)

  • Corby, B. C., Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (2007). Gender identity and adjustment in black, Hispanic, and white preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(1), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, B. A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. L., & Tate, C. C. (2016). Extending the legacy of sandra bem: Psychological androgyny as a touchstone conceptual advance for the study of gender in psychological science. Sex Roles, 76(11–12), 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0713-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLay, D., Lynn Martin, C., Cook, R. E., & Hanish, L. D. (2018). The influence of peers during adolescence: Does homophobic name calling by peers change gender identity? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(3), 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0749-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halim, M. L., Ruble, D. N., & Amodio, D. M. (2011). From pink frilly dresses to “one of the boys”: A social-cognitive analysis of gender identity development and gender bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 933–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00399.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, J. A. (2015). Adolescents' gender typicality, psychological well-being, and experiences with teasing, bullying, and rejection (doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky). Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses database. (UMI no. 3731455)

  • Jewell, J. A., & Brown, C. S. (2014). Relations among gender typicality, peer relations, and mental health during early adolescence. Social Development, 23(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joel, D., Tarrasch, R., Berman, Z., Mukamel, M., & Ziv, E. (2014). Queering gender: Studying gender identity in ‘normative’ individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 5(4), 291–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2013.830640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.

  • Kornienko, O., Santos, C. E., Martin, C. L., & Granger, K. L. (2016). Peer influence on gender identity development in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 52(10), 1578–1592. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. (2016). We've come a long way, baby (but we're not there yet): Gender past, present, and future. Child Development, 87(1), 5–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Powlishta, K. K. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways [monograph]. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2, serial no. 231), 1-183.

  • Marasco, V. M. (2018). Addressing hegemonic masculinity with adolescent boys within the counseling relationship. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 4(3), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/23727810.2017.1422647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., Andrews, N. C., England, D. E., Zosuls, K., & Ruble, D. N. (2017). A dual identity approach for conceptualizing and measuring children's gender identity. Child Development, 88(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. W. (2012). Engendering gendered knowledge. Men and Masculinities, 15(1), 56–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenroth, T., & Ryan, M. K. (2018). Gender trouble in social psychology: How can butler's work inform experimental social psychologists' conceptualization of gender? Fronteirs in Psychology, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. (2012). Self-perceived gender typicality, gender-typed attributes, and gender stereotype endorsement in elementary- school-aged children. A Journal of Research, 67(7), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0184-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauletti, R. E., Cooper, P. J., & Perry, D. G. (2014). Influences of gender identity on children's maltreatment of gender-nonconforming peers: A person x target analysis of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(5), 843–866. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauletti, R. E., Menon, M., Cooper, P. J., Aults, C. D., & Perry, D. G. (2017). Psychological androgyny and children’s mental health: A new look with new measures. Sex Roles, 76(11–12), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0627-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. G., Pauletti, R. E., & Cooper, P. J. (2019). Gender identity in childhood: A review of the literature. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418811129

  • Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 858–932). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). Engendering identity: Toward a clearer conceptualization of gender as a social identity. Sex Roles, 73(11–12), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0536-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 624–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (2010). The intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117(2), 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yunger, J. L., Carver, P. R., & Perry, D. G. (2004). Does gender identity influence children's psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma F. Jackson.

Ethics declarations

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interests or external funding for this research.

Authors declare that the study complied with the ethical standards of the Authors’ institution, including participant consent and adherence to the APA ethical guidelines.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Felt Pressure for Gendered Behavior Scale

There are three portions to this 18-item measure, varying the six items in each to target a parent, friends, and one’s self. The instructions for each section then are: (a) “Think about your mother, father or someone else who looks after you a lot. For the following questions, think about that person as your parent.”; (b) “Now think about how your friends would be if you did these activities.”; and (c) “Now think about how you would be if you did these activities.”

  1. 1.

    If I wore a skirt and makeup my parent [my friends; I] would be …

  2. 2.

    If I started a girly activity like ballet my parent [my friends; I] would be …

  3. 3.

    If I was spending a lot of time with girls, my parent [my friends; I] would be …

  4. 4.

    If I wore the jersey of the sports team I support, my parent [my friends; I] would be …

  5. 5.

    If I joined a boys’ sports club, my parent [my friends; I] would be …

  6. 6.

    If I was spending a lot of time with boys, my parent [my friends; I] would be…

Note. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale where 1 = Very pleased, 2 = Quite pleased, 3 = A little pleased, 4 = Wouldn’t care, 5 = A little upset, 6 = Quite upset, 7 = Very upset. For analysis, items are recoded from −3 (Very pleased) to +3 (Very upset). The first three items measure feminine stereotyped behavior; the last three, masculine stereotyped.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, E.F., Bussey, K. Under Pressure: Differentiating Adolescents’ Expectations Regarding Stereotypic Masculine and Feminine Behavior. Sex Roles 83, 303–314 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01113-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01113-0

Keywords

Navigation