Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Matching Abilities to Careers for Others and Self: Do Gender Stereotypes Matter to Students in Advanced Math and Science Classes?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) careers falls off more quickly for young women than for young men over adolescence, and gender stereotypes may be partially to blame. Adolescents typically become more stereotypical in their career interests over time, yet they seem to become more flexible in applying stereotypes to others. Models of career interest propose that career decisions result from the alignment of self-perceived abilities with occupation-required skills and that gender stereotypes may influence this process. To investigate the discrepancy between applying stereotypes to self and others, we examined if these models can be applied to perceptions of others. Focusing on students from fifth grade through college enrolled in advanced STEM courses, we investigated how STEM occupational stereotypes, abilities, and efficacy affect expectations for others’ and own career interests. U.S. participants (n = 526) read vignettes describing a hypothetical male or female student who was talented in math/science or language arts/social studies and then rated the student’s interest in occupations requiring some of those academic skills. Participants’ self-efficacy, interest, and stereotypes for STEM occupations were also assessed. Findings suggest that ability beliefs, whether for oneself or another, are powerful predictors of occupational interest, and gender stereotypes play a secondary role. College students were more stereotypical in their ratings of others, but they did not manifest gender differences in their own STEM self-efficacy and occupational interests. Experiences in specialized STEM courses may explain why stereotypes are applied differentially to the self and others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Alabama STEM Education Research Team (ASERT), which in addition to J. Barth and R. Guadagno, includes Beverly Roskos, Marion Goldston, Debra M. McCallum, and Beth Todd at the University of Alabama, as well as Carmen Burkhalter at the University of North Alabama.

Funding

The present work was supported by the National Science Foundation [HRD-0734074].

Portions of this paper were presented at the 2010 conference of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan M. Barth.

Ethics declarations

We have followed the ethical standards of the American Psychological Association.

The University of Alabama’s Institutional review board approved this research.

Conflict of Interest

There are no potential conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was provided by all participants

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barth, J.M., Kim, H., Eno, C.A. et al. Matching Abilities to Careers for Others and Self: Do Gender Stereotypes Matter to Students in Advanced Math and Science Classes?. Sex Roles 79, 83–97 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0857-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0857-5

Keywords

Navigation