Abstract
A sexual double standard in adolescence has important implications for sexual development and gender inequality. The present study uses longitudinal social network data (N = 914; 11–16 years of age) to test if gender moderates associations between adolescents’ sexual behaviors and peer acceptance. Consistent with a traditional sexual double standard, female adolescents who reported having sex had significant decreases in peer acceptance over time, whereas male adolescents reporting the same behavior had significant increases in peer acceptance. This pattern was observed net of respondents’ own perceived friendships, further suggesting that the social responses to sex vary by gender of the sexual actor. However, findings for “making out” showed a reverse double standard, such that female adolescents reporting this behavior had increases in peer acceptance and male adolescents reporting the same behavior had decreases in peer acceptance over time. Results thus suggest that peers enforce traditional sexual scripts for both “heavy” and “light” sexual behaviors during adolescence. These findings have important implications for sexual health education, encouraging educators to develop curricula that emphasize the gendered social construction of sexuality and to combat inequitable and stigmatizing peer responses to real or perceived deviations from traditional sexual scripts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, J. P., Schad, M. M., Oudekerk, B., & Chango, J. (2014). What ever happened to the “cool” kids? Long‐term sequelae of early adolescent pseudomature behavior. Child Development, 85, 1866–1880. doi:10.1111/cdev.12250.
Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “Hooking Up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9(3), 22–27. doi:10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.22.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2.
Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
Boislard, M. A. P., Dussault, F., Brendgen, M., & Vitaro, F. (2013). Internalizing and externalizing behaviors as predictors of sexual onset in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 920–945. doi:10.1177/0272431612472982.
Bordini, G. S., & Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality and Culture, 17, 686–704. doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9163-0.
Bowleg, L., Lucas, K. J., & Tschann, J. M. (2004). “The ball was always in his court”: An exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts, and condom use among African American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 70–82. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00124.x.
Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7.
Brown, B. B. (1999). “You're going out with who?”: Peer group influences on adolescent romantic relationships. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence. Cambridge studies in social and emotional development (pp. 291–329). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Busse, P., Fishbein, M., Bleakley, A., & Hennessy, M. (2010). The role of communication with friends in sexual initiation. Communication Research, 37, 239–255. doi:10.1177/0093650209356393.
Carpenter, L. M. (2005). Virginity lost: An intimate portrait of first sexual experiences. New York: NYU Press.
Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relationships and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical applications (pp. 23–56). Mahweh: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Centers for Disease Control. (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011. MMWR, 61(SS-4). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/PDF/SS/SS6104.PDF.
Cillessen, A. H., & Marks, P. E. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). New York: Guilford Press.
Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., & Moors, A. C. (2013). Backlash from the bedroom stigma mediates gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 392–407. doi:10.1177/0361684312467169.
Connolly, J., & McIsaac, C. (2011). Romantic relationships in adolescence. In M. Underwood & L. Rosen (Eds.), Social development: Relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence (pp. 180–203). New York: Guilford Press.
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163.
Eder, D., Evans, C. C., & Parker, S. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
England, P., & Bearak, J. (2014). The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among US university students. Demographic Research, 30, 1327–1338. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.46.
Gentry, M. (1998). The sexual double standard: The influence of number of relationships and level of sexual activity on judgments of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 505–511. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00173.x.
Giordano, P. C. (2003). Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 257–281. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100047.
Giordano, P. C., Longmore, M. A., & Manning, W. D. (2006). Gender and the meanings of adolescent romantic relationships: A focus on boys. American Sociological Review, 71, 260–287. doi:10.1177/000312240607100205.
Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right. New York: Council on Families.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Guggino, J. M., & Ponzetti, J. J., Jr. (1997). Gender differences in affective reactions to first coitus. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 189–200. doi:10.1006/jado.1996.0076.
Halpern, C. T., Kaestle, C. E., & Hallfors, D. D. (2007). Perceived physical maturity, age of romantic partner, and adolescent risk behavior. Prevention Science, 8, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s11121-006-0046-1.
Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 33–50. doi:10.1080/01621459.1981.10477598.
Howell, J. L., Egan, P. M., Giuliano, T. A., & Ackley, B. D. (2011). The reverse double standard in perceptions of student-teacher sexual relationships: The role of gender, initiation, and power. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 180–200. doi:10.1080/00224540903510837.
Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women's talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127. doi:10.1348/014466603763276153.
Kapungu, C. T., Holmbeck, G. N., & Paikoff, R. L. (2006). Longitudinal association between parenting practices and early sexual risk behaviors among urban African American adolescents: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(5), 783–794. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9102-1.
Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164. doi:10.1177/019027250907200205.
Laursen, B., & Hartup, W. W. (2002). The origins of reciprocity and social exchange in friendships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 95, 27–40. doi:10.1002/cd.35.
Lefkowitz, E. S., Shearer, C. L., Gillen, M. M., & Espinosa-Hernandez, G. (2014). How gendered attitudes relate to women’s and men’s sexual behaviors and beliefs. Sexuality and Culture, 18, 833–846. doi:10.1007/s12119-014-9225-6.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363.
Lippold, M. A., Greenberg, M. T., Graham, J. W., & Feinberg, M. E. (2013). Unpacking the effect of parental monitoring on early adolescent problem behavior mediation by parental knowledge and moderation by parent–youth warmth. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 1800–1823. doi:10.1177/0192513X13484120.
Lyons, H., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Identity, peer relationships, and adolescent girls’ sexual behavior: An exploration of the contemporary double standard. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 437–449. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.506679.
Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2005). Adolescents’ involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Social Science Research, 34, 384–407. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.03.001.
Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship contexts of “nonrelationship” sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 459–483. doi:10.1177/0743558406291692.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2006). Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 54, 19–26. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). The impact of social interaction on the sexual double standard. Social Influence, 2, 29–54. doi:10.1080/15534510601154413.
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Patterns of gender development. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 353–381. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511.
Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 409–420. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.661102.
Mehta, C. M., & Strough, J. (2009). Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29, 201–220. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.06.001.
Miller, J. (2008). Getting played: African American girls, urban inequality, and gendered violence. New York: NYU Press.
Moore, S. M., & Rosenthal, D. A. (1992). The social context of adolescent sexuality: Safe sex implications. Journal of Adolescence, 14, 415–435. doi:10.1016/0140-1971(92)90072-D.
National Guidelines Task Force. (2004). Guidelines for comprehensive sexuality education: Kindergarten to 12th grade, 3rd edition. Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS). Retrieved from http://sexedu.org.tw/guideline.pdf.
Osgood, D. W., McMorris, B. J., & Potenza, M. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: Item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 267–296. doi:10.1023/A:1016008004010.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x.
Ragsdale, K., Bersamin, M. M., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Kerrick, M. R., & Grube, J. W. (2014). Development of sexual expectancies among adolescents: Contributions by parents, peers and the media. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 551–560. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.753025.
Reid, J. A., Elliott, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender and Society, 25, 545–568. doi:10.1177/0891243211418642.
Reiss, I. L. (1956). The double standard in premarital sexual intercourse: A neglected concept. Social Forces, 34, 224–230. doi:10.2307/2574041.
Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (2002). After the sexual revolution: Gender politics in teen dating. Contexts, 1, 16–24. doi:10.1525/ctx.2002.1.1.16.
Rostosky, S. S., Wilcox, B. L., Wright, M. L. C., & Randall, B. A. (2004). The impact of religiosity on adolescent sexual behavior: A review of the evidence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(6), 677–697. doi:10.1177/0743558403260019.
Rulison, K., Kreager, D. A., & Osgood, D. W. (2014). Delinquency and peer acceptance in adolescence: A within-person test of Moffitt’s hypotheses. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2437–2448. doi:10.1037/a0037966.
Schvaneveldt, P. L., Miller, B. C., Berry, E. H., & Lee, T. R. (2001). Academic goals, achievement, and age at first sexual intercourse: Longitudinal, bidirectional influences. Adolescence, 36, 767–787.
Shoveller, J. A., Johnson, J. L., Langille, D. B., & Mitchell, T. (2004). Socio-cultural influences on young people's sexual development. Social Science and Medicine, 59(3), 473–487. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.017.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22(1), 53–60. doi:10.1007/BF02701260.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 491–497. doi:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5.
Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, G. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.
South, S. J., Haynie, D. L., & Bose, S. (2005). Residential mobility and the onset of adolescent sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 499–514. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00131.x.
Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004). PROSPER community–university partnership model for public education systems: Capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prevention Science, 5, 31–39. doi:10.1023/B:PREV.0000013979.52796.8b.
Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Clair, S., & Feinberg, M. (2007). Substance-use outcomes at 18 months past baseline: The PROSPER community–university partnership trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 395–402. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.014.
Sprecher, S., Barbee, A., & Schwartz, P. (1995). “Was it good for you, too?”: Gender differences in first sexual intercourse experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 3–15. doi:10.1080/00224499509551769.
Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Walvoord, E. C. (2010). The timing of puberty: Is it changing? Does it matter? Journal of Adolescent Health, 47, 433–439. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.05.018.
Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13, 496–502. doi:10.1177/1066480705278729.
Zaikman, Y. Z., & Marks, M. J. (2014). Ambivalent sexism and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 71, 333–344. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0417-1.
Zaikman, Y., Vogel, E.A., Vicary, A.M., & Marks, M.J. (in press). The influence of early experiences and adult attachment on the exhibition of the sexual double standard. Sexuality and Culture, 1–21. doi:10.1007/s12119-015-9332-z.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Rose Wesche, Wayne Osgood, and Scott Gest for comments on an earlier draft. This project is supported by grants from the W.T. Grant Foundation (8316), National Institute on Drug Abuse (RO1-DA08225), and NIH Grant 2 R24 HD041025 awarded to the population center at Pennsylvania State University. The research uses data from PROSPER, a project directed by R. L. Spoth and funded by grant RO1-DA013709 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The Double Standard at Sexual Debut: Gender, Sexual Behavior and Adolescent Peer Acceptance
Conflict of Interest
None
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
Secondary Survey Data of Human Subjects.
Informed Consent
N/A, Secondary Data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kreager, D.A., Staff, J., Gauthier, R. et al. The Double Standard at Sexual Debut: Gender, Sexual Behavior and Adolescent Peer Acceptance. Sex Roles 75, 377–392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x