Abstract
Gender-related cognitions have been central to accounts of well-being in children and adults in the United States. Yet, the child and adult literatures are currently not aligned in how they measure these experiences, creating an asymmetry in scientific understanding. The current investigation aligns these literatures by using the short-form of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI; Bem 1981) (adult literature) and a modified version of Egan and Perry’s (2001) Gender Typicality Scale (child literature) with cisgender (i.e., those whose current gender identity is the same label as their birth-assigned category) adult participants. These measures were used to determine the relative contributions of each to self-esteem using nonprobability samples of heterosexual and queer (i.e., lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, and asexual) women and men in the United States. The analyzed groups consisted of cisgender individuals: heterosexual women (N = 97), heterosexual men (N = 90), queer women (N = 83), and queer men (N = 51). All groups showed significant contributions of adult gender typicality to self-esteem, over and above the BSRI dimensions. Thus, both self-reported gender typicality and self-reported endorsement of certain BSRI dimensions are important indicators of well-being in cisgender adults in the United States.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahams, B., Feldman, S. S., & Nash, S. C. (1978). Sex role self-concept and sex role attitudes: Enduring personality characteristics or adaptations to changing life situations? Developmental Psychology, 14, 393–400. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.14.4.393.
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLauglin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.
Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643. doi:10.1037/h0077098.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Carlson, H. M., & Steuer, J. (1985). Age, sex-role categorization, and psychological health in American homosexual and heterosexual men and women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 203–211. doi:10.1080/00224545.1985.992287.
Carver, P., Yunger, J., & Perry, D. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49, 95–109. doi:10.1023/A:1024423012063.
Carver, P. R., Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2004). Children who question their heterosexuality. Developmental Psychology, 40, 43–53. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.43.
Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Newman, J. L. (2008). The Bem sex-role inventory: Continuing theoretical problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 881–900. doi:10.1177/0013164408315267.
Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322.
Cronin, A., & King, A. (2010). Power, inequality, and identification: Exploring diversity and intersectionality amongst older LGB adults. Sociology, 44, 876–892. doi:10.1177/0038038510375738.
Diamond, M. (1993). Homosexuality and bisexuality in different populations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 291–310. doi:10.1007/BF01542119.
Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.
Factor, R., & Rothblum, E. (2008). Exploring gender identity and community among three groups of transgender individuals in the United States: MTSs, FTMs, and genderqueers. Health Sociology Review, 17, 235–253. doi:10.5172/hesr.451.17.3.235.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x.
Gonzalez, C. A., Bockting, W. O., Beckman, L. J., & Duran, R. E. (2012). Agentic and communal personality traits: Their associations with depression and resilience among transgender women. Sex Roles, 67, 528–543. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0202-y.
Hegarty, P. (2009). Toward an LGBT-informed paradigm for children who break gender norms: Comment on Drummond et al. (2008) and Reiger et al. (2008). Developmental Psychology, 45, 895–900. doi:10.1037/a0016163.
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412.
Hoffman, R. M. (2001). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Historical perspective and implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79, 472–485. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01995.x.
Hoffman, R. M., & Borders, L. D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39–55.
Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley.
Kuper, L. E., Nussbaum, R., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 244–254. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.596954.
Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2009). Gender and empathic accuracy: The role of communion in reading minds. Sex Roles, 60, 387–398. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9544-x.
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
Meyer, I. H., & Wilson, P. A. (2009). Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 23–31. doi:10.1037/a0014587.
Myers, A. M., & Gonda, G. (1982). Empirical validation of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 304–318. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.304.
Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & Peterson, M. A. (1986). Negative life stress, social support, and depressive symptoms: Sex roles as a moderator variable. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 599–609.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.996.
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smith, T. E., & Leaper, C. (2005). Self-perceived gender typicality and the peer context during adolescence. Journal of Research and Adolescence, 16, 91–103. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00123.x.
Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity and gender related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 1–97). New York: Academic.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1979). Comparison of masculine and feminine personality attributes and sex-role attitudes across age groups. Developmental Psychology, 15, 583–584. doi:10.1037/h0078091.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1981). Androgyny versus gender schema: A comment on Bem’s gender schema theory. Psychological Review, 88, 365–368. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.365.
Spence, J. T., Helmrich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0076857.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Tate, C. (2011). The “problem of number” revisited: The relative contributions of psychosocial, experiential and evolutionary factors to the desired number of sexual partners. Sex Roles, 64, 644–657. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9774-6.
Tate, C. C. (2012). Considering lesbian identity from a social-psychological perspective: Two different models of “being a lesbian.” Journal of Lesbian Studies, 16, 17–29. doi:10.1080/10894160.2011.557639.
Tate, C. (2014). Gender identity as a personality process. In B. L. Miller (Ed.), Gender identity: Disorders, developmental perspectives and social implications (pp. 1–22). Hauppauge: Nova.
Tate, C. C., Ledbetter, J. N., & Youssef, C. P. (2013). A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 767–776. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.690110.
Tate, C. C., Youssef, C. P., & Bettergarcia, J. N. (2014). Integrating the study of transgender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology, 18, 302–312. doi:10.1037/gpr0000019.
Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (2010). Intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117, 601–622. doi:10.1037/a0018936.
Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Vandello, J.A., Bosson, J.K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R.M., & Weaver, J.R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339.
Whitley, B. E. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.765.
Whitley, B. E. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225. doi:10.1007/BF00288048.
Whitley, B. E. (1988). Masculinity, femininity, and self-esteem: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 419–431. doi:10.1007/BF00288393.
Witt, M. G., & Wood, W. (2011). Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Sex Roles, 62, 635–646. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9761-y.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 629–667). Hoboken: Wiley.
Yunger, J. L., Carver, P. R., & Perry, D. G. (2004). Does gender identity influence children’s psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40, 572–582. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.572.
Acknowledgments
No funding source aided in the collection of these data. Portions of these data were presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP) on January 18, 2013, in New Orleans, LA, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Gender Typicality (Women)
Instructions: Women have a range of feelings about how typical they are in comparison to other women. Please read each statement and indicate your agreement with it. Remember, there are no right or wrong answers, so please answer honestly.
-
1.
I feel just like women my age.
-
2.
I feel I fit in with other women.
-
3.
I think I am a good example of other women.
-
4.
I feel that what I like to do in my spare time is similar to what most women like to do in their spare time. I feel that the things I am good at are similar to what most women are good at.
-
5.
I feel that the things I am good at are similar to what most women are good at.
-
6.
I feel that my personality is similar to most women’s personalities.
Gender Typicality (Men)
Instructions: Men have a range of feelings about how typical they are in comparison to other men. Please read each statement and indicate your agreement with it. Remember, there are no right or wrong answers, so please answer honestly.
-
1.
I feel just like men my age.
-
2.
I feel I fit in with other men.
-
3.
I think I am a good example of other men.
-
4.
I feel that what I like to do in my spare time is similar to what most men like to do in their spare time.
-
5.
I feel that the things I am good at are similar to what most men are good at.
-
6.
I feel that my personality is similar to most men’s personalities.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tate, C.C., Bettergarcia, J.N. & Brent, L.M. Re-assessing the Role of Gender-Related Cognitions for Self-Esteem: The Importance of Gender Typicality for Cisgender Adults. Sex Roles 72, 221–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0458-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0458-0