Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Body Surveillance and Body Shame in College Men: Are Men Who Self-Objectify Less Hopeful?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study examined self-objectification and hope in a sample of undergraduate men from a Midwestern university in the United States (N = 227). Specifically, an online survey utilizing self-report measures examined the associations between body surveillance, body shame, trait hope, social relationship hope, and romantic relationship hope were considered through the lenses of Objectification Theory and the Broaden and Build Theory of Positive Emotions. Consistent with Hypothesis 1, bivariate correlations showed that more body surveillance was associated with less trait agency, less trait pathways, less social relationship pathways, and less romantic relationship pathways. As well, more body shame was associated with less trait agency, less trait pathways, less social relationship pathways, less romantic relationship agency, and less romantic relationship pathways. Additionally, consistent with Hypothesis 2 and the model proposed by Objectification Theory, body shame explained relations between body surveillance and hope, specifically, trait agency, social relationship pathways, romantic relationship agency, and romantic relationship pathways in a path analysis. This work fills an important gap in the current literature, as it is the only study to date that examines relations between self-objectification and hope, and furthers objectification research among men. Results are discussed within the context of Objectification Theory and the Broaden and Build Theory of Positive Emotions. Implications and future directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58, 5–14. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association, Division 51 (2013). About us: who we are. Retrieved from http://www.division51.org/aboutus/whoweare.htm.

  • Aubrey, J. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56, 366–386. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00024.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babyak, M. A., Snyder, C. R., & Yoshinobu, L. (1993). Psychomteric properties of the hope scale: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 154–169. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1993.1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, A., & Grieve, F. (2006). Exposure to male models in advertisements leads to a decrease in men’s body satisfaction. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnum, D. D., Snyder, C. R., Rapoff, M. A., Mani, M. M., & Thompson, R. (1998). Hope and social support in the psychological adjustment of children who have survived burn injuries and their matched controls. Children’s Health Care, 27, 15–30. doi:10.1207/s15326888chc2701_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berendes, D., Keefe, F. J., Somers, T. J., Kothadia, S. M., Porter, L. S., & Cheavens, J. S. (2010). Hope in the context of lung cancer: Relationships of hope to symptoms and psychological distress. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 40, 174–182. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. J., Rapoff, M. A., Snyder, C. R., & Belmont, J. M. (2007). The relationship of children’s hope to pediatric asthma treatment adherence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 176–184. doi:10.1080/17439760701409629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S. & Klein, O. (2012). Self-objectification and recognition of sexually objectified bodies: a vicious circle. Manuscript in press at British Journal of Social Psychology.

  • Beyers, W., Goossens, L., Vansant, I., & Moors, E. (2003). Structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 351–365. doi:10.1023/A:1024922031510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. (1999). The male body: A new look at men in public and in private. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598. doi:10.1177/0146167207313727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. C. (1998). Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student population: Some implications for theory and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 953–962. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199811)54:7<953::AID-JCLP9>3.0.CO;2-F.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheavens, J. S., Feldman, D. B., Gum, A., Michael, S. T., & Snyder, C. R. (2006). Hope therapy in a community sample: A pilot investigation. Social Indicators Research, 77, 61–78. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-5553-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. M., & Dyrkacz, L. (1998). Differential prediction of maladjustment scores with the Snyder hope subscales. Psychological Reports, 83, 1035–1041. doi:10.2466/PR0.83.7.1035-1041.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L. A., & Snyder, C. R. (2000). Hope takes the field: Mind matters in athletic performances. In C. R. Snyder & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications (pp. 243–259). San Diego, CA: Academic. doi:10.1016/B978- 012654050-5/50015-4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1952). The second sex (trans: Parshley, H.M.). New York, NY: Knopf.

  • Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736–748. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. R., & Stalikas, A. (2008). Positive emotions as generators of therapeutic change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 18, 137–154. doi:10.1037/1053-0479.18.2.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzoi, S. L., Vasquez, K., Sparapani, E., Frost, K., Martin, J., & Aebly, M. (2012). Exploring body comparison tendencies: Women are self-critical whereas men are self-hopeful. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 99–109. doi:10.1177/0361684311427028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., Fessler, D. T., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men’s and women’s magazines? Body Image, 2, 81–86. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., Peplau, L., & Lever, J. (2006). The swimsuit issue: Correlates of body image in a sample of 52,677 heterosexual adults. Body Image, 4, 413–419. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., Buchanan, G. M., Sadehgi-Azar, L., Peplau, L., Haselton, M. G., Berezovskaya, A., & Lipinski, R. E. (2007a). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men’s body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 103–117. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.8.2.103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., Forbes, G. B., Grigorian, K. E., & Jarcho, J. M. (2007b). The UCLA body project I: Gender and ethnic differences in self-objectification and body satisfaction among 2,206 undergraduates. Sex Roles, 57, 317–327. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9251-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and well-being. Prevention & Treatment, 3, 1–25. doi:10.1037/1522-3736.3.1.31a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 170–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, R. J., Littell, R. C., & Creighton, L. (2003). Regression using JMP. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 904–917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (2011). The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17. doi:10.1177/0361684310386121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, K., Myers, B. J., & Mackintosh, V. H. (2005). Hope, social support, and behavioral problems in at-risk children. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75, 211–219. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.75.2.211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallsworth, L., Wade, T., & Tiggemann, M. (2005). Individual differences in male body-image: An examination of self-objectification in recreational body builders. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 453–465. doi:10.1348/135910705X26966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K., & Cantor, J. (1997). The relationship between media consumption and eating disorders. Journal of Communication, 47, 40–67. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02692.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. A., & Robinson, J. D. (2003). Eating disorders in men: Current considerations. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 10, 297–306. doi:10.1023/A:1026357505747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimerdinger-Edwards, S. R., Vogel, D. L., & Hammer, J. H. (2011). Extending sexual objectification theory and research to minority populations, couples, and men. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 140–152. doi:10.1177/0011000010383894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilleary, S. M., Shorey, H. S., Etchison, S., & Snyder, C. R. (2003, May). Hope and avoidant attachment: Is hope adaptive in a social vacuum? Poster presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Convention, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Irving, L. M., Snyder, C. R., Cheavens, J., Gravel, L., Hanke, J., Hilberg, P., & Nelson, N. (2004). The relationships between hope and outcomes at the pretreatment, beginning, and later phases of psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 14, 419–443. doi:10.1037/1053-0479.14.4.419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, J., & Pipher, M. (1999). Deadly persuasion: Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, P. (2002). Hope, defense mechanisms, and adjustment: Implications for false hope and defensive hopelessness. Journal of Personality, 70, 207–231. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S. J., Snyder, C. R., & Teramoto-Pedrotti, J. T. (2003). Hope: Many definitions, many measures. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 91–107). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2009). Therapist’s guide to positive psychological interventions. Burlington, MA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W., Wei, M., & Russell, D. W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Kirkbride, A. (2007). Those speedos become them: The role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men’s body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 634–647. doi:10.1177/0146167206297403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Churchett, L. (2008). The shape of things to come: Gay men’s satisfaction with specific body parts. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 248–256. doi:10.1037/a0012473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123. doi:10.1023/A:1018834001203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. (2006). The developmental and cultural contexts of objectified body consciousness: A longitudinal analysis of two cohorts of women. Developmental Psychology, 42, 679–687. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menshealth.com. (2012, September 10). Retrieved from http://www.menshealth.com/.

  • Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: The impact of self-objectification on women’s overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458–466. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9357-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, S. T., & Snyder, C. R. (2005). Getting unstuck: The roles of hope, finding meaning, and rumination in adjustment to bereavement among college students. Death Studies, 29, 435–458. doi:10.1080/07481180590932544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, M. S., Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2012). Does exposure to muscularity-idealizing images have self-objectification consequences for heterosexual and sexual minority men? Psychology of Men & Masculinity. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1037/a0027259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00076\.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.

  • Nussbaum, M. (1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otake, K., Waugh, C. E., Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions unlock other-focused thinking. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011). His biceps become him: A test of objectification theory’s application to drive for muscularity and propensity for steroid use in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 246–256. doi:10.1037/a0021398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, K. L., & Cheavens, J. S. (2009). Hope theory. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 323–333). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, R. T., & Tylka, T. L. (2005). College men’s perceptions of ideal body composition and shape. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6, 209–220. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.3.209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlinger, D. (2002). Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles, 46, 61–74. doi:10.1023/A:1016575909173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, D. T., & Kiefer, A. K. (2007). Body concerns in and out of the bedroom: Implications for sexual pleasure and problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 808–820. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9205-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. P., Grammas, D. L., Sutherland, R., Siffert, K. J., & Bush-King, I. (2010). Masculine gender roles and differentiation: Predictors of body image and self-objectification in men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 208–224. doi:10.1037/a0018255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H. S., & Snyder, C. R. (2004). Development and validation of the domain hope scale- revised. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

  • Snyder, C. R. (1999). Hope, goal-blocking thoughts, and test-related anxieties. Psychological Reports, 84, 206–208. doi:10.2466/PR0.84.1.206-208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 249–275. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holeran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S.T., … Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.570

  • Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 321–335. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Cheavens, J., & Sympson, S. C. (1997). Hope: An individual motive for social commerce. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 107–118. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.1.2.107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2005). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 257–276). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Reasons for exercise and body esteem: Men’s responses to self-objectification. Sex Roles, 53, 495–503. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7137-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sympson, S. C. (1999). Validation of the domain specific hope scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

  • Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (1999). Finding benefits in adversity. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 279–304). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. doi:10.1348/0144665031752925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93–106. doi:10.1080/17439760500510569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 23–51. doi:10.1080/10705510701758166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, M., & Moradi, B. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi:10.1037/a0018937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wrobleski, K., & Snyder, C. R. (2005). Hopeful thinking in older adults: Back to the future. Experimental Aging Research, 31, 217–233. doi:10.1080/03610730590915452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zurbriggen, E. L., Ramsey, L. R., & Jaworski, B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 114 Teachers College Hall, P.O. Box 880345, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0345, USA

    Brian P. Cole, M. Meghan Davidson & Sarah J. Gervais

Authors
  1. Brian P. Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Meghan Davidson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah J. Gervais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian P. Cole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, B.P., Davidson, M.M. & Gervais, S.J. Body Surveillance and Body Shame in College Men: Are Men Who Self-Objectify Less Hopeful?. Sex Roles 69, 29–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0282-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0282-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation