Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling the Gender Difference in Depression: A Commentary on Cambron, Acitelli, and Pettit

  • Feminist Forum Review Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In reviewing Cambron, Acitelli, and Pettit’s interpersonal contingent self-esteem model of the gender difference in depression, we applaud their domain-match vulnerability-stress approach as well as their specification of the processes mediating self-esteem and depression. However, we argue that models of the gender difference in depression must address five key points in order to provide compelling and meaningful explanations. Such models should: consider that vulnerability, stress, or vulnerability-stress interactions may vary across domains; articulate the processes by which stress-reactive negative affect develops into depressive symptoms; take a developmental approach; be sensitive to social and political implications; and provide clear hypotheses regarding the mediating and moderating mechanisms implicated in the model. These suggestions apply to all researchers interested in explaining the gender difference in depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory base subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., Williams, S., McGee, R., & Silva, P. (1987). DSM-III disorders in preadolescent children: Prevalence in a large sample from the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 69–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: New perspectives. In P. J. Clayton & J. E. Barrett (Eds.), Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches (pp. 265–290). New York: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J., & Zuroff, D. C. (1992). Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition: Two prototypes for depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 527–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambron, M. J., Acitelli, L. K., & Pettit, J. W. (2009). Explaining gender differences in depression: An interpersonal contingent self-esteem perspective. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Charbonneau, A., Mezulis, A., & Hyde, J. S. (2009). Stress and emotional reactivity as explanations for gender differences in adolescents’ depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, in press.

  • Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Kasen, S., Velez, C., Hartmark, C., Johnson, J., et al. (1993). An epidemiological study of disorders in late childhood and adolescence, I: Age- and gender-specific prevalence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 851–867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranowski, J. M., Frank, E., Young, E., & Shear, K. (2000). Adolescent onset of the gender difference in lifetime rates of major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 21–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. C., Matthews, K. A., & Twamley, E. W. (1999). Is life more difficult on Mars or Venus? A meta-analytic review of sex differences in major and minor life events. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 83–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (1996). Gender development and gender effects. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 358–396). New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeffel, G. J., Gibb, B. E., Metalsky, G. I., Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Hankin, B. L., et al. (2008). Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression: Development and validation of the cognitive style questionnaire. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 824–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. (1991). The generation of stress in the course of unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 555–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. (1999). The emergence of an interpersonal approach to depression. In T. Joiner & J. C. Coyne (Eds.), The interactional nature of depression: Advances in interpersonal approaches (pp. 21–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. (2009). Stress exposure and stress generation in adolescent depression. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema & L. M. Hilt (Eds.), Handbook of depression in adolescents (pp. 305–333). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankin, B. L., & Abramson, L. Y. (2001). Development of gender differences in depression: An elaborated cognitive vulnerability-transactional stress theory. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 773–796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hankin, B. L., & Abramson, L. Y. (2002). Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression in adolescence: Reliability, validity, and gender differences. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 491–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L., Moffitt, T., Silva, P., McGee, R., & Angell, K. (1998). Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: Emerging gender difference in a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 128–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hankin, B. L., Mermelstein, R., & Roesch, L. (2007). Sex differences in adolescent depression: Stress exposure and reactivity models. Child Development, 78, 279–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (1994). Should psychologist study gender differences? Yes, with some guidelines. Feminism and Psychology, 4, 507–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Mezulis, A., & Abramson, L. Y. (2008). The ABCs of depression: Integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychological Review, 115, 291–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, T., & Coyne, J. C. (1999). The interactional nature of depression: Advance in interpersonal approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C. (2003). Epidemiology of women and depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 74, 5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R., McGonagle, K., Swartz, M., Blazer, D., & Nelson, C. (1993). Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey, I: Lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence. Journal of Affective Disorders, 29, 85–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Avenevoli, S., & Merikangas, K. R. (2001). Mood disorders in children and adolescents: An epidemiologic perspective. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 1002–1014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucht, M., Schaub, R. T., Meyer, C., Hapke, U., Rumpf, H. J., Bartels, T., et al. (2003). Gender differences in unipolar depression: A general population survey of adults between age 18 to 64 of German nationality. Journal of Affective Disorders, 77, 203–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mezulis, A., Abramson, L., & Hyde, J. S. (2002). Domain specificity of gender differences in rumination. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 16, 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezulis, A., Hyde, J. S., & Abramson, L. Y. (2006). The developmental origins of cognitive vulnerability to depression: Temperament, parenting, and negative life events in childhood as contributors to negative cognitive style. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1012–1025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Girgus, J. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424–443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinelli, M., & Wilkinson, G. (2000). Gender differences in depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 486–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, K. (2009). The interpersonal context of adolescent depression. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema & L. M. Hilt (Eds.), Handbook of depression in adolescents (pp. 377–418). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, K., & Hammen, C. (1999). Age and gender as determinants of stress exposure, generation, and reactions in youngsters: A transactional perspective. Child Development, 70, 660–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1986). The developmental psychopathology of depression: Issues and perspectives. In M. Rutter, C. Izard & P. Read (Eds.), Depression in young people. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 273–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2002). Age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and birth cohort differences in the Children’s Depression Inventory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 578–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. J., Cairney, J., & Pevalin, D. (2002). Emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence: National panel results from three countries. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuroff, D. C., Mongrain, M., & Santor, D. A. (2004).Conceptualizing and measuring personality vulnerability to depression: Comment on Coyne and Whifffen (1995). Psychological Bulletin, 130, 489-511.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Psychology, Seattle Pacific University, 3307 3rd Ave West, Suite 107, Seattle, WA, 98119, USA

    Amy H. Mezulis & Kristyn Funasaki

Authors
  1. Amy H. Mezulis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristyn Funasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy H. Mezulis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mezulis, A.H., Funasaki, K. Modeling the Gender Difference in Depression: A Commentary on Cambron, Acitelli, and Pettit. Sex Roles 61, 762–768 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9663-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9663-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation