Skip to main content
Log in

Threatening the Patriarchy: Testing an Explanatory Paradigm of Anti-lesbian Attitudes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been relatively little research on heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians that has utilized the considerable amount of feminist scholarship on the topic. The present study examined an explanatory paradigm derived from Pharr (Homophobia: A weapon of sexism, Chardon, Inverness, CA, USA, 1988) that considers defined norm, sexism, economic beliefs, and attitudes toward institutional violence to be associated with anti-lesbian attitudes. Using data from 365 heterosexual undergraduates from the Midwestern USA, the results of a structural equation modeling analysis found support for Pharr’s paradigm and suggest several directions for future research on anti-lesbian attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. A., Benjamin, A. J., Jr., Wood, P. K., & Bonacci, A. M. (2006). Development and testing of the Velicer attitudes toward violence scale: Evidence for a four-factor model. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsam, K. F., Rothblum, E. D., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2005). Victimization over the life span: A comparison of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual siblings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 477–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bardis, P. D. (1973). Violence: Theory and quantification. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 1, 121–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., & Johnson, K. (2000). Predictors of homophobia in female college students. Sex Roles, 42, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (2007). The Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire: Some unfinished business. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 434–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, N., & Lien, D. (2002). Measuring the effect of sexual orientation on income: Evidence of discrimination? Contemporary Economic Policy, 20, 394–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, P. R. (2003). The shifting foundations of public opinion about gay rights. Journal of Politics, 65, 1208–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1994). Separating lesbian theory from feminist theory. Ethics, 104, 558–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. (1981). Lesbianism: An act of resistance. In C. Moraga, & G. Anzaldúa (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (pp. 128–137). Watertown, MA, USA: Persephone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine-Simms, D. (Ed.) (2001). The greatest taboo: Homosexuality in black communities. Los Angeles: Alyson.

  • Corley, T. J., & Pollack, R. H. (1996). Do changes in the stereotypic depiction of a lesbian couple affect heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbianism? Journal of Homosexuality, 32(2), 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damiano, C. M. (1999). Lesbian baiting in the military: Institutionalized sexual harassment under “don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue”. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and Law, 7, 499–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2004). Value correlates of ambivalent attitudes about gender relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, K. (2000). Antigay behaviors among young adults: Prevalence, patterns, and motivators in a noncriminal population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 339–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, W., Harwood, J., & Hummert, M. (2006). College students’ multiple stereotypes of lesbians: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(3), 165–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaven, P. C. L., & Furnham, A. (1987). Race prejudice and economic beliefs. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 483–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1995). Black heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. (1997). The antigay agenda: Orthodox vision and the Christian Right. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. D., & Peng, K. (2005). White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring dominant-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 223–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunovich, R. M. (2004). Social structure position and prejudice: An exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes. Social Science Research, 33, 20–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaMar, L., & Kite, M. E. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. B. (2003). Black–white differences in attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (2004). “What group?” Studying whites and whiteness in the era of “color-blindness”. Sociological Theory, 22, 623–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J., Derlega, V. J., Clarke, E. G., & Kuang, J. C. (2006). Stigma consciousness, social constraints, and lesbian well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louderback, L. A., & Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1997). Perceived erotic value of homosexuality and sex-role attitudes as mediators of sex differences in heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, S. G. (2005). On the eve of war: Authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students’ attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 360–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. H., & Cunningham, M. (2003). Racial identity in white American college students: Issues of conceptualization and measurement. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2002). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2), 15–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, B. S. (2007). College students’ attitudes about lesbians: What difference does 16 years make? Journal of Homosexuality, 52(3/4), 249–265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, S. (1988). Homophobia: A weapon of sexism. Inverness, CA, USA: Chardon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5, 631–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996).

  • Simon, A. (1995). Some correlated of individuals’ attitudes toward lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 29(1), 89–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, M. C. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 39–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. R., & Medler, B. R. (1995). Is homophobia a weapon of sexism? Journal of Men’s Studies, 4, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Ferguson, M. J., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Avoiding stigma by association: Subtle prejudice against lesbians in the form of social distancing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M. (2006). Does internalized heterosexism moderate the link between heterosexist events and lesbians’ psychological distress? Sex Roles, 54, 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (1983). Conceptions of masculinity and femininity as a basis for stereotypes of male and female homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 9(1), 37–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theodore, P. S., & Basow, S. A. (2000). Heterosexual masculinity and homophobia: A reaction to the self? Journal of Homosexuality, 40(2), 31–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F., Huckel, L. H., & Hansen, C. E. (1989). A measurement model for measuring attitudes toward violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, W. W. (2006). Exploring heterosexual women’s anti-lesbian attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(2), 139–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I thank Cindy Cerrentano, Jeff Foldenauer, Diana Swanson, and Brett Wells for their constructive comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Thanks are also due to Sandy Arntz, Lisa Finkelstein, Amy Martin, and Patty Wallace for their assistance in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne W. Wilkinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkinson, W.W. Threatening the Patriarchy: Testing an Explanatory Paradigm of Anti-lesbian Attitudes. Sex Roles 59, 512–520 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9432-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9432-4

Keywords

Navigation