Skip to main content
Log in

Defensive Reactions to Masculinity Threat: More Negative Affect Toward Effeminate (but not Masculine) Gay Men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined whether, due to men’s desire to reject stereotypically feminine traits in themselves, a masculinity threat would elicit negative affect toward effeminate, but not masculine gay men. Fifty-three male undergraduates from the United States received bogus feedback that they had either a “masculine” or “feminine” personality before rating affect toward two “types” of gay men: effeminate and masculine. Results were consistent with the notion that defensive reactions target groups stereotyped as having the specific traits perceivers wish to deny in themselves: masculinity threat selectively increased negative affect toward effeminate, but not masculine, gay men. Thus, gay men who exhibit feminine traits may be at particular risk from men whose masculinity is threatened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Prewitt-Freilino, J. L., & Taylor, J.N. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clausell, E., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). When do subgroup parts add up to the stereotype whole? Mixed stereotype content for gay male subgroups explains overall ratings. Social Cognition, 23, 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS Map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (in press).

  • Dovidio, J. F., Brigham, J. C., Johnson, B. T., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276–319). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2004). Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: Sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 259–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govorun, O., Fuegen, K., & Payne, K. B. (2006). Stereotypes focus defensive projection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 781–793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M., Foster, J. B., Mannix, L. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Formal and interpersonal discrimination: A field study of bias toward homosexual applications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 815–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1989). Hate crimes against lesbians and gay men: Issues for research and policy. American Psychologist, 44, 948–955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilianski, S. E. (2003). Explaining heterosexual men’s attitudes toward women and gay men: The theory of exclusively masculine identity. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1990). Statistics: An introduction (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Whitely, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes towards homosexual persons, behavior and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaMar, L. & Kite, M. E. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laner, M. R., & Laner, R. H. (1979). Personal style or sexual preference: Why gay men are disliked. International Review of Modern Sociology, 9, 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, D., Devos, T. & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaffey, A. L., Bryan, A., & Hutchison, K. E. (2005). Using startle eye blink to measure the affective component of antigay bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, H., & Six, B. (1996). How strong is the relationship between prejudice and discrimination? A meta-analytic answer. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodore, P. S., & Basow, S. A. (2000). Heterosexual masculinity and homophobia: A reaction to the self? Journal of Homosexuality, 40, 31–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taywaditep, K. J. (2001). Marginalization among the marginalized: Gay men’s anti-effeminacy attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 1–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, W. W. (2004). Authoritarian hegemony, dimensions of masculinity, and male antigay attitudes. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5, 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R. (2005). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Sociological Association Meetings. Philadelphia, PA, August.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Glick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glick, P., Gangl, C., Gibb, S. et al. Defensive Reactions to Masculinity Threat: More Negative Affect Toward Effeminate (but not Masculine) Gay Men. Sex Roles 57, 55–59 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9195-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9195-3

Keywords

Navigation