Abstract
How are experiences of and reactions to guilt and shame a function of gendered views of the self? Individual differences in guilt and shame responses were explored in a sample of 104 young adults, most of whom were European American. Results indicated that, although women reported greater proneness to guilt and shame, men reported more trait guilt. Heightened levels of guilt- and shame-proneness were observed among both men and women with traditionally feminine gender roles, whereas a more traditionally masculine self-concept was associated with decreased shame-proneness for women. Gender schematic women favored verbal responses to ameliorate the experience of guilt, whereas gender schematic men preferred action-oriented responses. These results are discussed as gendered outcomes of schematic versus aschematic gender role socialization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Athenstaedt, U., Haas, E., & Schwab, S. (2004). Gender role self-concept and gender-typed communication behavior in mixed-sex and same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 50, 37–52.
Bem, S. L. (1981a). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
Bem, S. L. (1981b). Bem Sex Role Inventory professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Benetti-McQuoid, J., & Bursik, K. (2002). Guilt and shame vignettes scoring manual. Unpublished scoring manual.
Bursik, K. (1991). Correlates of adjustment during the separation and divorce process. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 14, 137–162.
Bybee, J., & Quiles, Z. N. (1998) Guilt and mental health. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 269–291). New York: Academic Press.
Eckes, T., & Trautner, H. (2000). The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Efthim, D. W., Kenny, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2001). Gender role stress in relation to shame, guilt, and externalization. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79, 430–438.
Einstein, D., & Lanning, K. (1998). Shame, guilt, ego development and the Five-Factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 66, 555–577.
Evans, E. G. (1984). Hostility and sex guilt: Perceptions of self and others as a function of gender and sex role orientation. Sex Roles, 10, 207–215.
Ferguson, T. J., & Crowley, S. L. (1997). Gender differences in the organization of guilt and shame. Sex Roles, 37, 19–43.
Ferguson, T. J., Eyre, H. L., & Ashbaker, M. (2000). Unwanted identities: A key variable in shame—anger links and gender differences in shame. Sex Roles, 42, 133–157.
Ferguson, T. J., & Stegge, H. (1995). Emotional states and traits in children: The case of guilt and shame. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 174–197). New York: Guilford.
Guastello, D., & Guastello, S. (2003). Androgyny, gender role behavior, and emotional intelligence among college students and their parents. Sex Roles, 49, 663–684.
Harder, D. W. (1995). Shame and guilt assessment, and relationships of shame- and guilt-proneness to psychopathology. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 368–392). New York: Guilford.
Jones, W. H., Schratter, A. K., & Kugler, K. (2000). The Guilt Inventory. Psychological Reports, 87, 1039–1042.
Kubany, E. S., & Watson, S. B. (2003). Guilt: Elaboration of a multidimensional model. Psychological Record, 53, 51–90.
Kugler, K., & Jones, W. H. (1992). On conceptualizing and assessing guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 318–327.
Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York: International Universities Press.
Lutwak, N., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Moral affect and cognitive processes: Differentiating shame from guilt among men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 891–896.
Matlin, M. (2004). The psychology of women (5th edn.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Niedenthal, P. M., Tangney, J. P., & Gavanski, I. (1994). “If only I weren’t” versus “If only I hadn’t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 585–595.
Tangney, J. P. (1991). Moral affect: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598–607.
Tangney, J. P. (1996). Conceptual and methodological issues in the assessment of shame and guilt. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 741–754.
Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P., Fletcher, C., & Gramzow, R. (1992). Shamed into anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 669–675.
Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P., & Gramzow, R. (1992). Proneness to shame, proneness to guilt, and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 469–478.
Thompkins, C. D., & Rando, R. A. (2003). Gender role conflict and shame in college men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 79–81.
Whitley, B. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benetti-McQuoid, J., Bursik, K. Individual Differences in Experiences of and Responses to Guilt and Shame: Examining the Lenses of Gender and Gender Role. Sex Roles 53, 133–142 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4287-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4287-4