Abstract
This article examines the role elementary school children’s spontaneous metaphors play in learning science. The data consists of tape recordings of about 25 h from five different schools. The material is analysed using a practical epistemology analysis and by using Dewey’s ideas on the continuity and transformation of experience. The results show the rich and varied meanings that children put into their spontaneous metaphors. Their metaphors deal with facts as well as norms and aesthetics in relation to the science content taught and they influence learning both through what is made salient, as well as through their relations to the children’s possibilities of proceeding with their undertakings. Often one and the same metaphor encompassed all these cognitive, aesthetic and normative aspects at the same time. It is discussed how this rich meaning can be cultured in a productive way, and how the children’s spontaneous metaphors, with all their relations, can be used to enhance conceptual learning and also learning about the nature of metaphor use in science. Through their connection with various experiences of the children, it is also shown how children’s spontaneous metaphors have the potential to enliven and humanise the subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asoko H. (2002). Developing Conceptual Understanding in Primary Science. Cambridge Journal of Education 32(2):153–164
Bloom J.W. (1992a). The Development of Scientific Knowledge in Elementary School Children: A Context of Meaning Perspective. Science Education 76(4):339–413
Bloom J.W. (1992b). Contexts of Meaning and Conceptual Integration: How Children Understand and Learn. In: Duschl R.A., Hamilton R.J. (eds) Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 177–194
Brickhouse N.W., Lowery P., Schultz K. (2000). What Kind of a Girl does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(5):441–458
Brown D., Clement J. (1989). Overcoming Misconceptions via Analogical Reasoning: Abstract Transfer versus Explanatory Model Construction. Instructional Science 18(4):237–261
Cameron L. (2002). Metaphors in the Learning of Science: A Discourse Focus. British Educational Research Journal 28(5):673–688
Cobern W.W., Aikenhead G.S. (1998). Cultural Aspects of Learning Science. In: Fraser B.J., Tobin K. (eds) The International Handbook of Science Education. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 39–52
Dagher Z.R. (1995). Review of Studies on the Effectiveness of Instructional Analogies in Science Education. Science Education 79(3):295–312
Dewey, J.: 1925/1958, Experience and Nature, Dover, New York
Dewey, J.: 1934/1980, Art as Experience, Perigree Books, New York
Dewey, J.: 1938/1997, Experience and Education, Touchstone, New York
Flannery M.C. (1991). Science and Aesthetics: A Partnership for Science Education. Science Education 75(5):577–593
Gee J.P., Green J.L. (1998). Discourse Analysis, Learning and Social Practice: a Methodological Study. Review of Research in Education 23:119–169
Grayling A.C. (1996). Epistemology. In: Bunnin N., Tsui-James E.P. (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford, U.K., pp. 38–63
Heywood D. (2002). The Place of Analogies in Science Education. Cambridge Journal of Education 32(2):233–247
Hutchby I., Wooffitt R. (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K
Jakobson, B. & Wickman, P.-O.: manuscript, Aesthetic Distinction in Elementary School Science
Keller E.F. (1998). Gender and Science: Origin, History, and Politics. In: Hull D.L., Ruse M. (eds) The Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 398–413
Lakoff G., Johnson M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lave J. (1996). The Practice of Learning. In: Chaiklin S., Lave J. (eds) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 3–32
Lemke J.L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood
Lidar M., Lundqvist E., Östman L. (2006). Teaching and Learning in the Science Classroom: The Interplay Between Teachers’ Epistmological Moves and Students’ Practical Epistemology. Science Education 90(1):148–163
Lubben F., Netshisaulu T., Campbell B. (1999). Student’s Use of Cultural Metaphors and their Scientific Understandings Related to Heating. Science Education 83(6):761–774
Lynch M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Merriam-Webster: 2004, Merriam Webster Online Dictionary, http://www.m-w.com
Mortimer E.F., Scott P.H. (2003). Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Open University Press, Maidenhead, U.K
Muscari P.G. (1988). The Metaphor in Science and in the Science Classroom Science Education 72(4):423–431
Ogborn J., Kress G., Martins I., McGillicuddy K. (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Open University Press, Buckingham, U.K
Östman L. (1994). Rethinking Science Teaching as a Moral Act. Journal of Nordic Educational Research 14(3):141–150
Piaget J. (1970). Genetic Epistemology. Columbia University Press, New York
Rogoff B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford University Press, New York
Rorty R. (1991). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Sutton C. (1995). Words, Science and Learning, Open University Press, Buckingham
Thomas G.P., McRobbie C.J. (1999). Using Metaphor to Probe Students’ Conceptions of Chemistry Learning. International Journal of Science Education 21(6):667–685
Tobin K., Tippins D.J. (1996). Metaphors as Seeds for Conceptual Change and the Improvement of Science Teaching. Science Education 80(6):711–731
Wickman P.-O. (2004). The Practical Epistemologies of the Classroom: a Study of Laboratory work. Science Education 88(3):325–344
Wickman P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic Experience in Science Education: Learning as Situated Talk and Action. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey
Wickman P.-O., Östman L. (2002a). Learning as Discourse Change: A Sociocultural Mechanism. Science Education 86(5):1–23
Wickman P.-O., Östman L. (2002b). Induction as an Empirical Problem: How Students Generalize During Practical Work. International Journal of Science Education 24(5):465–486
Wittgenstein L. (1967). Philosophical Investigations (second edition). Blackwell, Oxford
Wong E.D. (1993). Understanding the Generative Capacity of Analogies as a Tool for Explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(10):1259–1272
Zembylas M. (2004). Emotion Metaphors and Emotional Labor in Science Teaching. Science Education 88(3):301–324
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jakobson, B., Wickman, PO. Transformation through Language Use: Children’s Spontaneous Metaphors in Elementary School Science. Sci Educ 16, 267–289 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9018-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9018-x