Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Longitudinal Studies: Designs, Validity, Practicality, and Value

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming to encourage longitudinal studies in science education, we clarify conceptual and methodological aspects of longitudinal research. We use the studies that other articles in this issue describe to illustrate these aspects. The illustrations range from attempts to promote long-term change through experimental teaching to investigations that describe change without intending to affect it. For both experimental and descriptive studies we discuss the validity of conclusions and insights, and how threats to validity may be reduced or eliminated. We highlight implications for teaching and the curriculum, and for the conduct of research. We describe the practicalities of longitudinal research, referring to time, resources, management of data, and attrition of subjects, and end with a summary of reasons why longitudinal studies are valuable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arzi, H. J. (1988). From short- to long-term: Studying science education longitudinally. Studies in Science Education, 15, 17–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2003, August). The time dimension in teacher education: Perspectives from a longitudinal study of science teachers. Paper presented at the 10th biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Padova, Italy.

  • Benbow, C. P., & Minor, L. L. (1986). Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., & Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1098–1148). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (2001). The revolution in research on science teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 457–471). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T., & Tisher, R. P. (1986). Research on natural sciences. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 874–905). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australia

    Richard T. White

  2. Consultant, Tel Aviv

    Hanna J. Arzi

Authors
  1. Richard T. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanna J. Arzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard T. White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, R.T., Arzi, H.J. Longitudinal Studies: Designs, Validity, Practicality, and Value. Res Sci Educ 35, 137–149 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3437-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3437-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation