Skip to main content
Log in

Person-Environment Fit and its Effects on University Students: A Response Surface Methodology Study

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The amount of time, effort, and money expended in pursuit of a college degree makes it important that students choose a university that is a good fit for them. Unfortunately students often determine whether a university is a fit for them through trial and error. This research investigated student-university fit and its relationship with satisfaction and well-being. We assessed student-university fit by developing 18 fit factors and measuring needs for, and supplies of, those factors. We tested our hypotheses using polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. Data from 228 students suggest that student-university fit is predictive of students’ satisfaction with their university and psychological well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banning, J. H., & McKinley, D. L. (1980). Conceptions of the campus environment. In W. H. Morrill, J. C. Hurst, & E. R. Oetting (Eds.), Dimensions of intervention for student development (pp. 39–57). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, D. F., Chatman, J. A., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2008). Profile comparison methods for assessing person-situation fit. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 356–361). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. H. (1987). Improving student fit with the academic environment. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyne, R. K. (1978). An analysis of student-environment mismatches. Journal of College Student Personnel, 19, 461–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. R. (1987). Anticipatory person-environment fit as a predictor of college student health and adjustment. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 394–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 292–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (2008). Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 361–372). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Harrison, R. V. (1993). Job demands and worker health: Three dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 628–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 85–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D. (1975). Campus environments, student stress, and campus planning. In B. Bloom (Ed.), Psychological stress in the campus community (pp. 25–41). New York: Behavorial Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A., Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2004). What do college students have to lose? Exploring the outcomes of differences in person-environment fits. Journal of Higher Education, 75, 528–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, K. C., & Kelly, R. J. (1990). Environmental fit and the success or failure of high-risk college students. Educational Policy, 4, 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., Jr., Rodgers, W., & Cobb, S. (1974). Adjustment as person-environment fit. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316–333). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbreath, B. (2004). Creating healthy workplaces: The supervisor’s role. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 93–118). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbreath, B. (2008). Creating career-conducive organizations: A primary intervention approach. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 8–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gloria, A. M., & Kurpius, S. E. R. (2001). Influences of self-beliefs, social support, and comfort in the university environment on the academic nonpersistence decisions. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A. (2008). Pitching fits in applied psychological research: Making fit methods fit theory. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 389–416). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, L. A. (1980). Interaction of student and campus. In U. Delworth, G. R. Hanson, et al. (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (pp. 117–155). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ironson, G. H., Smith, P. C., Brannick, M. T., Gibson, W. M., & Paul, K. B. (1989). Constitution of a job in general scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2005). Marching to the beat of a different drummer: Examining the impact of pacing congruence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurements, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Jansen, K. J. (2008). Issues of person-organization fit. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 123–153). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual’s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyden, G., & Kuk, G. (1993). The role of supervision in a healthy organization: The case of educational psychology services. Educational and Child Psychology, 10, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, L. P., Nelson, D. L., & Barr, S. H. (1997). Person–environment fit and creativity: An examination of supply–value and demand–ability versions of fit. Journal of Management, 23, 119–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings, and policy implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1988). Psychosocial factors in the workplace. In S. Fisher & J. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of life stress, cognition and health (pp. 193–209). Oxford, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafziger, D. H., Holland, J. L., & Gottfredson, G. D. (1975). Student-college congruency as a predictor of satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2, 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowack, K. M. (1991). Stress assessment profile. Woodland Hills, CA: Organizational Performance Dimensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff, C. (2008). General methodological and design issues. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 352–356). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff, C., & Schulte, M. (2008). Multiple perspectives of fit in organizations across levels of analysis. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 3–69). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A. (1967). A twenty-college study of student-college interaction using TAPE (Transactional analysis of personality and environment): Rationale, reliability, and validity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W. (1962). Job attitudes in management: Perceived deficiencies in need fulfillment as a function of job level. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person-environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47, 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, L. P. (1968). Effect on college choice satisfaction of matching students and colleges. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 47, 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Person-environment fit and its implications for personality development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 72, 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, C. T., & Lubin, B. (1986). College student mental health: A person-environment interactional analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solórzano, L. (2004). Best buys in college education (8th ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, T. J., & Sherry, P. (1984). College student distress as a function of person-environment fit. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 436–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. News & World Report. (2009). Best colleges 2009. Retrieved July 14, 2009 from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/national.

  • Voluntary System of Accountability Program. (2009). Undergraduate education reports. Retrieved July 13, 2009 from http://www.voluntarysystem.org/index.cfm.

  • Westerman, J. W., Nowicki, M. D., & Plante, D. (2002). Fit in the classroom: Predictors of student performance and satisfaction in management education. Journal of Management Education, 26, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, M. D. (1994). College choice cognitive dissonance: Managing student/institution fit. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 5, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. E. (1986). Student-institution fit: Linking campus ecology to enrollment management. The Campus Ecologist, 4(4), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintre, M., Knoll, G., Pancer, S., Pratt, M., Poliyy, J., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., et al. (2008). The transition to university: The student-university match (SUM) questionnaire. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 745–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P. H., & Handal, P. J. (1984). Person-environment fit: Is satisfaction predicted by congruency, environment, or personality? Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 503–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Levine, E. L., Smith, M. A., Ipsas, D., & Rossi, M. E. (2008). Person-environment fit or person plus environment: A meta-analysis of studies using polynomial regression analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brad Gilbreath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbreath, B., Kim, TY. & Nichols, B. Person-Environment Fit and its Effects on University Students: A Response Surface Methodology Study. Res High Educ 52, 47–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9182-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9182-3

Keywords

Navigation